Author Topic: Ken Zisa Trial  (Read 15504 times)

Offline just watching

  • Long-time poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • Karma: -25
    • View Profile
Ken Zisa Trial
« on: March 28, 2012, 06:12:42 AM »

Jury selection hits roadblocks in trial of suspended Hackensack Police Chief Zisa

TUESDAY MARCH 27, 2012, 5:55 PM
BY STEPHANIE AKIN
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD
PRINT | E-MAIL
Follow live blogging from the trial

 Photos: Trial of Hackensack police chief Ken Zisa

HACKENSACK – Jury selection for the criminal trial against suspended Hackensack Police Chief Charles “Ken” Zisa and his former girlfriend has faced a series of roadblocks in its first two days, throwing into question whether opening arguments can be held Monday as scheduled.


AMY NEWMAN/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER
Suspended Hackensack Police Chief Charles 'Ken' Zisa with his attorney Patricia Prezioso in court Monday.
“We have to take it every day as it comes,” Zisa’s attorney, Patricia Prezioso, said as she left the courtroom Tuesday.

Francis Meehan, the attorney for Kathleen Tiernan – Zisa’s ex-girlfriend – said he thought the delays will ripple into next week, but it’s too early to say for sure.

“We’ll know more tomorrow,” he said.

Proceedings have been interrupted three times by courthouse fire drills. Jury selection has also been delayed by a shortage of available candidates in the jury pool because of competition from a concurrent trial.

“I’ve never had this happen to me before, in a civil or criminal case, where I can’t get jurors,” Judge Joseph Conte told the court during a break in the selection process.

Zisa, who has been suspended from the department without pay since 2010, faces a minimum of 15 years in prison if convicted of charges including a pattern of official misconduct, witness tampering and insurance fraud. He is accused of intervening in two investigations – in 2004 and 2008 – to protect Tiernan and her family. Tiernan, who is charged with conspiracy to commit official misconduct and insurance fraud, faces up to 15 years in prison if convicted.

A group of 34 jurors remained at the end of the day Tuesday after dozens were eliminated because they would not get paid by their employers for attending the six-week trial, had vacations planned or had a health issue, among other allowable excuses.

Prezioso and Assistant Bergen County Prosecutor Daniel Keitel both told the judge they expected many of the remaining jurors to be eliminated once the attorneys ask more probing questions about opinions they have formed from media coverage or personal relations. During this phase, the judge can dismiss as many jurors as he feels have a conflict.

The case has been highly publicized in local media, including in The Record. The Zisa family – which, in addition to Ken Zisa, includes two longtime Hackensack mayors, a former and present city attorney and a former deputy police chief – is well known in the region, complicating the selection process. The jurors will also have to commit to up to six weeks for the trial, a period which includes the Easter holiday.

At the end of the preliminary elimination process, Keitel will be allowed to eliminate 20 jury members and each defense attorney will be allowed to eliminate 10, without disclosing their reasons, according to New Jersey Court Rules. The final jury will have 12 members and three alternates.

Staff writer Kibret Markos contributed to this article. Email: akin@northjersey.com
« Last Edit: March 28, 2012, 06:21:43 AM by just watching »



Offline just watching

  • Long-time poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • Karma: -25
    • View Profile
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2012, 06:21:12 AM »
Witness list hints at focus of Zisa trial

MONDAY, MARCH 26, 2012       LAST UPDATED: TUESDAY MARCH 27, 2012, 3:16 PM
BY STEPHANIE AKIN
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD
PAGES: 1 2 > DISPLAY ON ONE PAGE | PRINT | E-MAIL
Follow live blogging from the trial

 Photos: Trial of Hackensack police chief Ken Zisa

HACKENSACK — The list of potential witnesses in the criminal trial of suspended Hackensack Police Chief Charles “Ken” Zisa and his former girlfriend, Kathleen Tiernan, includes the names of dozens of police officers, prominent attorneys and even a pair of state legislators.


AMY NEWMAN/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER
Suspended Hackensack Police Chief Charles 'Ken' Zisa in court Monday.
The list of 141 names — made public Monday on the first day of jury selection — and a questionnaire distributed to potential jurors hinted at the direction arguments might take. It also offered a clue to why the trial is slated to last as long as six weeks.

“That’s a lot of people for a trial,” said Jeffrey Garrigan, a Union City attorney who defended Dennis Elwell, a former mayor of Secaucus, against federal bribery charges in August.

The list reads like a Who’s Who in Hackensack, where Zisa has served as police chief since 1995 and represented the 37th Legislative District in the Assembly from 1994 to 2002.

Some of the potential witnesses have obvious connections to the two incidents that led to the charges against Zisa and Tiernan.

Zisa, who is accused of a pattern of official misconduct and insurance fraud, could spend a minimum of 15 years in prison if convicted. The charges against Tiernan, conspiracy to comment official misconduct and insurance fraud, could result in a prison term of up to 15 years.

Hackensack Police Officer Laura Campos, who allegedly followed Zisa’s orders to change a 2004 police report to omit the names of Tiernan’s then-teenaged-sons, is on the list, along with Sgt. Thomas Aletta and Capt. Danilo Garcia, both of whom have been suspended and face criminal charges for their alleged roles in the cover-up.

Both of Tiernan’s sons, Ryan and Michael, are named, along with the acquaintance they allegedly robbed and assaulted.

The officers who allegedly witnessed Tiernan crash Zisa’s car into a utility pole in February 2008 — Campos, Joseph Al-Ayoubi and John Hermann of the Hackensack police and Sgt. Eric Arosemowicz of the Bergen County Sheriff’s Office — are also included. Zisa is accused of intervening in the investigation to protect Tiernan, who had allegedly been drinking, and then filing a fraudulent insurance claim.

Other connections to the case are more mysterious.

The list includes police officers who sued Zisa and the Police Department in the year before his indictment – such as Anthony Ferraioli, the police union president who has been suspended and indicted in an unrelated assault case, as well as Sgt. Jennifer Finley and Sgt. Vincent Riotto. An attorney who represents several of them, Patrick Toscano, is also named, along with several attorneys who have represented the city: Dennis Calo, who has been hired by the city to oversee the police lawsuits, city labor attorney Eric Bernstein and Zisa’s civil attorney, Richard Malagiere.

The list also includes Bergen County Prosecutor John L. Molinelli and his wife, Tammy.

It also delves into the world of Bergen County Democratic politics. Dennis J. Oury, the former counsel to the county Democrats who pleaded guilty to federal corruption charges in 2009, is named, as are State Sen. Loretta Weinberg, D-Teaneck – a onetime political rival of Zisa’s – and Assemblyman Gordon Johnson, D-Englewood.

Brian Neary, a Hackensack-based defense attorney who has represented several prominent politicians in Bergen and Passaic County, said a large and varied list of potential witnesses can be expected in a case that involves someone as well known as Zisa.

Continue reading this story on page 2 PAGES: 1 2 DISPLAY ON ONE PAGE | PRINT | E-MAIL

Witness list hints at focus of Zisa trial


MONDAY, MARCH 26, 2012       LAST UPDATED: TUESDAY MARCH 27, 2012, 3:16 PM
BY STEPHANIE AKIN
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD
PAGES: < 1 2 DISPLAY ON ONE PAGE | PRINT | E-MAIL
Follow live blogging from the trial

 Photos: Trial of Hackensack police chief Ken Zisa

“There’s a lot of tentacles to this case, so you get a lot of names,” he said.

Just because a name is on the list doesn’t mean that person will testify, he added. Some of the names on the list belong to people who might be mentioned during the course of the trial, he said.

The jury questionnaire also offered a glimpse at the strategies developing on both sides as they prepare to pare down the pool of prospective jurors later this week.

Along with the standard questions about criminal history, employment background and attitudes toward police officers and elected officials, prospective jurors were asked to detail their personal experiences with the Policeman’s Benevolent Association, drunken driving arrests and their media consumption habits.

Attorneys generally pay close attention to jury attitudes toward law enforcement, Neary said, but in this case, the traditional roles of the prosecutors and defense attorneys will be switched. The state, which usually looks for jurors who empathize with the police, will likely want to fill the jury box with people who could convict an accused police chief, he said. Meanwhile, defense attorneys, who traditionally look for jurors who question authority, will seek candidates supportive of law enforcement.

“That would be the interesting flip flop,” Neary said.

Jury selection is scheduled to continue throughout the week, with opening statements tentatively scheduled for Monday.

Email: akin@northjersey.com


Offline just watching

  • Long-time poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • Karma: -25
    • View Profile
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2012, 07:09:16 AM »
This trial is a wonderful lesson in civics for all the youth in Hackensack.  We know that we live in a free country, in a democracy, when the authorities themselves can be put on trial for their alleged wrongdoings. Nobody is above the law, not even the Chief of Police.  WOW. Imagine the impact that this is having on our youth.  Whatever the outcome may be, this is the closest thing that Hackensack has ever had to the Nuremburg Trials.

Offline Editor

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4430
  • Karma: 17
    • View Profile
    • Hackensack Now
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2012, 12:49:24 PM »
That's probably the worst comparison I've ever heard and I'm certain people will be offended by it.

Offline just watching

  • Long-time poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • Karma: -25
    • View Profile
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #4 on: March 28, 2012, 05:38:28 PM »
Sure, let's tone it down one notch.  How about comparing this trial to the trial of Saddam Hussein ???

I believed that I was on his enemies list, and I left Hackensack to get away from this man.  It's terrible for one citizen to have to live in fear of another citizen who happens to be the Chief of Police.  And to have to move out of your own town.  And if he's convicted and I know he'll never return to his Chief position, maybe then I'll move back to Hackensack.

Offline averagejoe

  • HackensackNow Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 15
  • Karma: -3
    • View Profile
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2012, 06:01:13 PM »
"Enemies list"? Good to see you're still delusional.Thats one constant in this universe

Offline just watching

  • Long-time poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • Karma: -25
    • View Profile
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2012, 07:29:02 PM »
It's a real shame that we had to wait so many years for this.  The owner of Cubby's, Bobby Egan had Chief Zisa nailed, and the downfall of the mighty Chief could have happened years earlier.  I was so disappointed when that case settled.  Egan won a huge settlement, and I think there were stories in The Record. The actual settlement amount might even be public information.  Egan should have stuck to his guns and pursued the case.  He's a tough guy, he's got balls.  He could have done it.

And now nobody knows the real story on that one except Bobby Egan, and he's gagged.  Wasn't that the settlement --- Egan wins a huge cash award against Ken Zisa, and the deal is Egan has got a gag order against revealing any information ??? I seem to remember reading that in The Record.

People should have realized then how much abuse was going on within the Hackensack Police Department.  And now there are so many lawsuits, so much waste of public money, so much disgrace upon Hackensack. Egan could have stopped all of this many years ago.  Thank God for people like John Molinelli.

Since we are drawing historical comparisons here, how about calling this trial "Zisa-Gate".

I know that it is wrong to judge people by the worst incident in their life, and to overlook everything else, or even to take pleasure at someone's downfall.  Even in the case of a public figure.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2012, 02:43:15 PM by just watching »

Offline averagejoe

  • HackensackNow Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 15
  • Karma: -3
    • View Profile
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2012, 04:11:43 AM »
2 kinds of people in this world,Justwatching,those who have NOt smashed a puppy against a wall,and those who have...

Offline just watching

  • Long-time poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • Karma: -25
    • View Profile
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2012, 02:48:48 PM »
I think that, 13 years after the Zisa trial is over, people will not be judging his entire life by the single worst thing he was ever associated with.  He'll have the time to reflect on everything good and bad in his life, and maybe he will realize that there's more to life than power and authority. What really matters is helping other people, building a sense of community, and advancing civilization.

Right now, it is a current event of historical significance in Hackensack. Never before has a public figure, a former Assemblyman no less, been so embroiled in so many controversies.  This will have a big effect on many people, and it will chart the future direction of the HPD.

Offline just watching

  • Long-time poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • Karma: -25
    • View Profile
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2012, 06:35:47 AM »
Prosecutor says Chief Ken Zisa's 'whims' on trial

TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2012       LAST UPDATED: TUESDAY APRIL 3, 2012, 11:20 PM
BY STEPHANIE AKIN
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD

The whims of Ken Zisa — the scion of a family that has been immersed in North Jersey politics for several decades — overpowered the rule of law in the Hackensack Police Department, the prosecution said Tuesday during opening statements at the suspended police chief’s official misconduct trial.


MITSU YASUKAWA / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER
Suspended Hackensack Police Chief Charles 'Ken' Zisa listens to opening statements, sitting next to Kathleen Tiernan.
Zisa’s influence was at the heart of opening statements by Daniel Keitel, the assistant Bergen County prosecutor, even leading to a motion by the defense for a mistrial — not an uncommon move by defense attorneys who can argue that the prosecutor has made improper statements. Superior Court Judge Joseph Conte said he will rule on the motion today.

Zisa, a state assemblyman from 1994 to 2002, is accused of intervening in two separate police investigations to protect his live-in girlfriend at the time, Kathleen Tiernan, and her family. But in his opening statements, Keitel outlined the case in broader terms, portraying the chief’s actions as an affront to the tenets of democracy.

“We’re not the subjects to rulers and despots,” Keitel said. “What we’re subject to is the law. We’re not subject to people’s whims.”

Zisa faces at least 15 years in prison if convicted on charges that include a pattern of official misconduct, witness tampering and insurance fraud. A prominent figure in North Jersey politics, his trial threatens to put a black mark on the legacy of a family that has been influential for decades. In addition to the police chief, two mayors, two city attorneys and a deputy police chief have all carried the Zisa name in Hackensack.

Defense attorneys will make their opening statements today. But Zisa’s attorney, Patricia Prezioso, gave a hint at the tenor of her argument when she challenged some of Keitel’s statements after the jury left the room.

“I represent a man who has been suspended for two years and has lost everything that he has worked for, and suddenly, in this courtroom, being a member of a family that has served the community for many, many years, that’s a bad thing?” she said.

Zisa is accused of abusing his power to shield Tiernan’s two teenage sons from a police investigation after they were allegedly involved in a 2004 fistfight and robbery of another teenage acquaintance, Keitel told the jury. He is also accused of escorting an allegedly drunk Tiernan from the scene of a 2008 car accident before she could be investigated for drunken driving, Keitel said.

Tiernan faces charges of conspiracy to commit official misconduct and insurance fraud and could face up to 15 years in prison.

“Ken Zisa didn’t do his job by enforcing the law,” Keitel said. “He injected himself where he should not have injected himself, into cases where he knew the suspects.”
Prosecutor says Chief Ken Zisa's 'whims' on trial

PAGE 2

Zisa, often described as a person possessing both immense charm and an iron will, sat in the front of the courtroom in a charcoal gray suit, scrutinizing court documents through a pair of metal-rimmed glasses.

His former girlfriend, Kathleen Tiernan, sat next to him in a white button-down shirt and a tailored jacket, her blond hair loose at her shoulders. The two rarely exchanged words or even a glance.

In his statements, Keitel outlined the Zisa family’s dominance of Hackensack politics over more than half a century. Keitel told the jury to keep in mind that every witness they will see on the stand is familiar with the weight the Zisa name carries in Hackensack.

Keitel said four police officers scheduled to offer key testimony against Zisa — Hackensack Officers Laura Campos, John Hermann and Joseph Al-Ayoubi and Bergen County Sheriff’s Sgt. Eric Arosemowicz — have faced retaliation from their supervisors as recently as last week.

The officers will detail their complaints when they take the stand later, Keitel said, but they include internal disciplinary charges, pension deductions and criminal charges.

In arguing for the mistrial, Prezioso and fellow defense attorney Francis Meehan said Keitel’s statements about the witnesses created an unsupportable impression that Zisa was responsible for misfortune the officers brought upon themselves. They also said the prosecutor’s officers bypassed a court rule that required the defense attorneys to be notified of new information before it is provided to a jury.

“This is a political prosecution of my client,” Prezioso told the judge. “It’s like we fell through the rabbit hole and everything is being turned on its head. The story that was told to this jury was ridiculous.”

Email: akin@northjersey.com

PAGES: < 1 2 DISPLAY ON ONE PAGE | PRINT | E-MAIL
Tags:   Hackensack  |     Bergen  |     Crime & Courts

Offline just watching

  • Long-time poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • Karma: -25
    • View Profile
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #10 on: April 05, 2012, 08:54:14 AM »
Here's a gem from the opening arguments, as reported in The Record

"Molinelli, who was appointed by a Democratic governor, was nearing the end of his term and needed to be in good graces with Weinberg, a veteran of several clashes against the region’s political elite, Prezioso said. The senator could help him secure a reappointment from Republican Chris Christie, Prezioso said, but her support was far from certain.

The senator had wielded an unwritten rule allowing state senators to block, without explanation, gubernatorial nominees from their own counties, to hold up Molinelli’s previous reappointment in 2007. Prezioso added that she was not accusing Weinberg of being involved, but said Molinelli saw an opportunity in Weinberg’s hatred for Zisa, who had opposed Weinberg in a heated senate campaign in 2005."


You've got to be kidding.  Who actually believes that our Republican Governor gives a damn what one of the most liberal and openly partisan Democratic Senators thinks about anything.

I was expecting the defense to say it was a political witch hunt due to Kenny Zisa's battle with Molinelli over the proposed Prosecutor's Safe House on Summit Ave. At least that would be believable.

Offline just watching

  • Long-time poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • Karma: -25
    • View Profile
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2012, 04:56:21 PM »
The Record just posted an article online, at 4:49 PM. 

They are reporting that Chief Ken Zisa was found guilty of several of the offenses, but not everything charged.  The offenses that he was found guilty of carry mandatory jail time. 

http://www.northjersey.com/news/Jurors_say_theyve_reached_verdict_in_Zisa_trial.html?page=all
« Last Edit: May 16, 2012, 05:35:13 PM by Editor »

Offline Editor

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4430
  • Karma: 17
    • View Profile
    • Hackensack Now
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #12 on: September 12, 2012, 06:31:44 PM »
Part of former Hackensack police chief Zisa's verdict is overturned by judge
Wednesday September 12, 2012, 6:01 PM
BY  STEPHANIE AKIN
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK – A Superior Court Judge on Wednesday overruled the jury that convicted former Hackensack police Chief Ken Zisa of official misconduct and insurance fraud in May, dropping three of the four most serious charges against him.

Zisa will still face five or more years in jail when he is sentenced next Thursday for the convictions that stand: improperly removing his then live-in girlfriend from the scene of a 2008 car accident and later filing a fraudulent insurance claim for $11,000 in damages.

But he was cleared of three additional convictions involving his failure to recuse himself from a 2004 investigation involving Tiernan’s then-teenaged sons, who lived with him — charges that carried at least an additional five years in jail without parole.
 
In an hour-long explanation of his ruling, Judge Joseph Conte detailed several concerns with the trial,  including:   

 •Witnesses who provided conflicting testimony and at times contradicted their previous statements
 •Evidence that prosecutors agreed to protect police witnesses from administrative or criminal charges in unrelated internal investigations in return for their testimony against Zisa
 •Assistant Bergen County Prosecutor Daniel Keitel’s attempt to convince the jury that Zisa tried to intimidate and harass witnesses before they testified.

Conte also said he was not convinced that Zisa was required by state law or municipal regulations to avoid involvement in investigations involving his friends and family.

“The facts are inadequate and sparse as to any conduct from Ken Zisa that would trigger the duty to recuse,” Conte said.

Neither Zisa nor his attorney, Patricia Prezioso attended the hearing. The judge said the attorney was confused whether there would be a written or an oral ruling.

About 15 people attended the hearing, including a police officer, a local Zisa critic and the boyfriend of Zisa’s former girlfriend Kathleen Tiernan, who also was convicted on insurance fraud.

Keitel left the courtroom without commenting, but  the Prosecutor's Office released a statement later in the day.

“By upholding defendant’s conviction on the official misconduct count relating to the 2008 incident and the conviction on the insurance fraud count, the trial judge necessarily concluded that defendant’s trial was fair,” it read. “We heartily agree with that conclusion.  However, we respectfully disagree with the trial judge’s overruling  the jury’s conviction for official misconduct relating to the 2004 incident.”

The statement said the Prosecutor’s Office is confident that the judge will follow a 2007 state statute requiring at least five - year jail terms, without parole, for public officials convicted of official misconduct.

Prezioso is scheduled to give a press conference regarding the ruling at 5 p.m.

In interviews before the ruling, several criminal defense attorneys who specialize in official misconduct cases said it is extremely rare to see a judge overturn a jury verdict.

“Judges don’t want to act as a 13th juror,” said Jeffrey Garrigan, a Jersey-city based attorney and former assistant Hudson County prosecutor.

Prezioso had argued that there were several problems with the seven-week trial, including insufficient evidence that Zisa did anything improper when he inserted himself into a 2004 investigation involving Tiernan’s teenage sons, and when he removed an allegedly intoxicated Tiernan from the scene of a drunken driving crash four years later.

Prezioso also argued that Zisa’s and Tiernan’s convictions for insurance fraud should be overturned because, among other reasons, Zisa’s insurance company not have a policy at the time against reimbursing clients for damages to their cars caused by drunken driving accidents. That conviction was upheld Wednesday.

Zisa and Tiernan stated on their claim for $11,000 in damages that Tiernan swerved to avoid an animal, an account Prezioso said Zisa still stands by.

Keitel had previously said that all of Prezioso’s objections were dealt with extensively during the trial, and there was no reason to overturn the jury’s decision.

He also has pointed out that Zisa was acquitted on three counts — a sign, he said, that the jury carefully considered every issue put before it.

Zisa, a former assemblyman whose family is considered a Hackensack political dynasty,  was convicted on three counts of official misconduct, one count of insurance fraud and one count of a pattern of official misconduct.

Tiernan was allowed to enter the state’s Pretrial Intervention program in lieu of a sentence.
______________________________________________

A look at the ruling Wednesday

Conviction Overturned: Official misconduct (failure to recuse himself from investigation of his girlfriend’s sons) between Sept. 1 and Nov. 3, 2004. Sentence: Five- to 10-year jail term.
 
Conviction Overturned: Official misconduct (failing to recuse himself from investigation of his girlfriend’s accident) on or about Feb. 4, 2008. Sentence: Mandatory five-year jail term.
 
Conviction Overturned: Pattern of official misconduct by knowingly committing two or more acts that violated the official misconduct statute. Sentence: Five- to 10-year jail term.
 
Conviction Upheld: Official misconduct (knowingly committing unauthorized acts) on or about Feb. 4, 2008. Sentence: Mandatory five-year jail term.
 
Conviction Upheld: Insurance Fraud. Sentence: A third-degree crime, so no presumption of incarceration. Sentence: three- to five-year jail term.
 
Source: Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, state statutes


Email: akin@northjersey.com

Offline Editor

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4430
  • Karma: 17
    • View Profile
    • Hackensack Now
Re: Ken Zisa Trial
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2012, 07:08:54 PM »
Former Hackensack chief Zisa sentenced to 5 years in prison, remains free on bail
Thursday, September 20, 2012    Last updated: Thursday September 20, 2012, 3:35 PM
BY  MARLENE NAANES AND STEPHANIE AKIN
STAFF WRITERS
The Record

HACKENSACK — Former Police Chief Ken Zisa was sentenced to five years in prison without parole for improperly removing a woman, his then-girlfriend, from the scene of a 2008 car accident and filing a fraudulent insurance claim.

State Superior Court Judge Joseph Conte granted a request — lodged by defense attorney Patricia Prezioso — to allow him to remain free on $50,000 bail while he appeals his conviction.

Conte said Zisa posed no flight risk, no risk to the safety of the community and that he was convinced there were significant issues that would be raised on appeal. Zisa will have to wear a monitoring bracelet and submit to regular drug tests.

Zisa was sentenced to five years for official misconduct and three years for insurance fraud, and the terms will run concurrently, Conte said.

He was also ordered to pay a $1,000 fine to the court for the official misconduct charge, along with standard court fees, and restitution for the insurance.

Before he was sentenced, Zisa stood, buttoned his sport coat and looked directly at the judge while he listened, and gave small nods, at the sentence for each charge.

Conte said he would address Zisa's pension at a later court date, saying he would hear arguments from Prezioso, Assistant Bergen County Prosecutor Daniel Keitel and the attorney for Zisa's ex-wife.

Before handing down the sentence, Conte said he has received 53 letters on behalf of Zisa, only one of which argued for a more serious sentence. The authors included public officials, residents, current and former police officers and attorneys.

He cited one letter from a Hackensack University Medical Center nurse who remarked upon the many times she had seen Zisa in the emergency room over the past three decades checking on patients after hours, many of them injured police officers.

About 40 people attended the hearing, including Zisa's brothers Jack and Frank, and several of Zisa's friends and political supporters, including Lynne Hurwitz and School Board Attorney Richard Salkin. Several members of the police department sat near the back, including some who filed civil lawsuits against the former chief and sat through much of the seven-week trial.

Earlier in the hearing, Prezioso asked Conte to downgrade the official misconduct charge, waive the mandatory minimum sentence of five years and sentence Zisa to probation.

Prezioso compared the evidence against Zisa to other cases in which an official helped a friend and said in those situations the public officials were disciplined or reprimanded but they weren't charged criminally. She described Zisa's actions as a momentary lapse of judgment.

She pointed to his long history of public service, his brothers’ service to the city as a former mayor and former deputy police chief and the family's devotion to the city.

"He comes from a family dedicated to public service for many years and up until approximately 2010 that was seen as an honorable accomplishment," Prezioso said.

Keitel said there is only one person in the courtroom responsible for what happened to Zisa, and that's Zisa himself. 

"It was a betrayal of public trust," he said. "It is the reason people distrust public officials."

The damage to public perception and the department's morale is incalculable, he said. He then asked the judge to sentence Zisa to 13 years: eight years without parole for the official misconduct charge and five years on insurance fraud.

He also asked for Conte to impose the sentences consecutively and to make Zisa pay his share of the insurance claim payout as restitution.

Zisa, who appeared tired with circles under his eyes, commented only once during the hearing when the judge asked if he wanted to speak.

“I think Ms. Prezioso covered everything I would have said,” he said, standing, with a slight bow to the judge. “I appreciate the opportunity, and I don’t have anything to add to her comments at this time.”

Zisa and his brothers huddled together and engaged in a whispered conversation before he left the courtroom without talking to reporters. His brothers declined comment, as did Hurwitz and Salkin.

Former City Councilman Charles McAuliffe, a friend of the family, said he was happy Zisa will remain free on bail, calling it “some sort of justice.”

He said the sentence means “absolutely nothing” to the city.

“The city has an acting police chief, a city manager, a mayor and council,” he said. “Daily activities go on, the DPW, the garbage is going to be picked up. It doesn’t really affect the city and he’s going to be exonerated. I’m just happy he doesn’t have to serve a day in jail.”

Conte last week made a surprise ruling to partially overturn Zisa's conviction, saying he had substantial concerns about the evidence presented during the seven-week trial last spring.

Conte, ruling on a motion by Prezioso to vacate the verdict, overturned three convictions involving Zisa's failure to recuse himself from a 2004 investigation involving the then-teenage sons of Zisa's live-in girlfriend at the time, Kathleen Tiernan — charges that carried at least an additional five years.

The Bergen County Prosecutor's Office released a statement last week saying that prosecutors were confident that at sentencing, the judge would follow a 2007 state statute requiring at least five-year prison terms, without parole, for public officials convicted of official misconduct, one of the remaining charges.

The other, third-degree insurance fraud, carries a three- to five-year sentence with no presumption of incarceration.

Legal experts have said that the law leaves little leeway for judges to subvert mandatory minimum prison time, typically providing discretion only in cases where a defendant is mentally incompetent or when the prosecutor requests a lighter sentence.

Tiernan, who was also convicted of insurance fraud for her role in the 2008 incident, was allowed to enter the state's Pretrial Intervention program in lieu of a sentence. She also was required to pay her share of the insurance claim payout as restitution.

Email: naanes@northjersey.com and akin@northjersey.com

Offline Editor

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4430
  • Karma: 17
    • View Profile
    • Hackensack Now