Author Topic: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue  (Read 316244 times)

Offline Prospect Avenue Coalition

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #60 on: June 03, 2009, 01:18:06 AM »
Shout out to Tom living in one of the buildings in the area whose letter to the Editor appears on page 2 of The County Seat in the June 1st issue:

Don’t Eradicate Beautiful Old Hackensack

There have been two Hackensack Zoning Board meetings concerning the application for the construction of the Bergen-Passaic Long Term Acute Care facility on four lots along Prospect and Summit avenues. During the May 14 meeting, the line of protesting residents waiting to question the property owner, Richard Pineles, extended out the door. In many of his answers, Mr. Pineles seemed disingenuous. When asked why he wanted to build this facility in this neighborhood, he responded that he wanted to meet the needs of the senior citizens in the area. The questioner then turned to the audience and asked how many of these protesters were senior citizens and approximately two-thirds of the audience raised their hands. Apparently, these seniors were not buying his argument.
   
When he was questioned about inadequate parking at both the proposed facility and at Prospect Heights (a care facility also owned by Pineles), he said that there was sufficient parking at both buildings. The questioner wanted to know why his employees from Prospect Heights were illegally parking in the neighboring buildings’ parking lots and he said it was not his fault because people will park wherever they find a parking space.

The traffic on Prospect and Summit avenues is presently a nightmare at times. Can you imagine what it will be like if this proposed facility is allowed?

My greatest concern is that if this project is approved, a floodgate will be opened to future demolition of old homes on Summit Avenue and the prestigious beauty of Old Hackensack will further be erased.

Thomas Lydon
Hackensack

http://www.thecountyseat.biz/issues/June-1-2009.pdf
« Last Edit: January 04, 2013, 07:12:18 PM by swapcatsr »

Offline Prospect Avenue Coalition

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #61 on: June 07, 2009, 09:26:45 AM »
Is anyone able to attend the Public Hearing for the opening of a new hospital in Westwood on Monday, June 8 at 4:30 to 8:30 pm at Westwood Regional Junior/Senior High School at 701 Ridgewood Rd. in Washington Township? Please email prospectavenuecoalition@yahoo.com if you can attend.

http://www.keepourhospitalshealthy.org/view-comments-from-petition/

The Issue
The foundation of northern New Jersey’s healthcare system is at risk.

Hackensack University Medical Center, in a joint venture with a Texas private equity firm, Legacy Hospital Partners, is seeking approval to open a for-profit acute care facility on the former Pascack Valley Hospital (PVH) site. PVH went bankrupt and closed in November 2007, due in large part to what a recent Governor-appointed NJ Commission identified as “an oversupply of hospital beds that is…most pronounced in the Hackensack, Ridgewood, Paterson and the Newark/Jersey City market areas.”

The closure of PVH produced increased occupancy rates and financial stability at the remaining Bergen County hospitals.

This for-profit joint venture could significantly damage the financial strength of the other Bergen County hospitals, thereby destabilizing the region’s access to healthcare and reversing the benefits that have been provided to local residents.

When an oversupply of hospital beds floods a market, services and equipment are duplicated, driving up costs. Existing hospitals, their employees and the communities they serve pay a very serious price. The public bears the costs while profits go to a few.

There should be a satellite Emergency Department at the former Pascack Valley site so that residents have access in emergency situations. But to add a new inpatient, acute-care hospital in a region that has an oversupply of beds would be detrimental to the fragile healthcare system in Bergen County. As result, access and quality of care would be affected.

Healthy hospitals for all of Bergen County – that’s the issue. Let’s keep the whole community in mind.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2009, 07:59:53 AM by swapcatsr »

Offline Prospect Avenue Coalition

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #62 on: June 17, 2009, 07:21:55 AM »
If you live near Prospect/Summit Avenue or have to drive thru the area please do not forget to attend:

Second Special Zoning Board Meeting
Thursday June 25th at 7 pm
3rd floor auditorium
City Hall 65 Central Avenue
« Last Edit: July 20, 2011, 09:32:20 AM by swapcatsr »

Offline regina

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #63 on: June 22, 2009, 08:05:10 PM »
I believe there is some confusion about the upcoming ZB meeting.

At the last meeting people put their name on a list to speak. Some people think that those are the only people who can speak this week. As I understand it from what was said at a meeting last week, the people on the list will be the first to get an opportunity to speak. Other residents will also be permitted to speak after that.

Someone correct me if I misunderstood.

Offline Prospect Avenue Coalition

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #64 on: June 22, 2009, 08:28:28 PM »
That was my understanding as well. The people who put their names on the list will get to question the applicant at the beginning of the meeting and then we will hear the testimony from the architect/engineer/traffic experts. We will then question each of them. I expect that there will be a lot of people lining up to ask each of them relevant questions.

Offline Prospect Avenue Coalition

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #65 on: June 25, 2009, 08:22:47 AM »
BE THERE TONIGHT:


Second Special Zoning Board Meeting
Thursday June 25th at 7 pm
3rd floor auditorium
City Hall 65 Central Avenue

Offline Prospect Avenue Coalition

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #66 on: June 26, 2009, 12:49:03 AM »
Save the date - Wednesday July 22, 2009
Third Hackensack Zoning Board Special Meeting

Thank you everyone for coming out again to show your opposition to the Richard Pineles Bergen Passaic Long Term Acute Care facility. AGAIN we packed the auditorium.  Look to see who gets quoted in the next issue of the Hackensack Chronicle! For those of you who left during the break you really missed the action.
 
The Hackensack Zoning Board has scheduled the third Special Meeting for Wednesday, July 22nd at 7 pm in the 3rd floor auditorium at 65 Central Avenue.
 
Still to come are the engineer and traffic expert. We await with bated breath. We have to keep showing up in numbers. We have to be prepared to ask hard and relevant questions which will reveal that this project is not the right one for Prospect/Summit Avenues. If you can't be there at 7 pm come when you can. If you are not in town on that day get someone to go in your place. See you then.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2009, 08:01:26 AM by swapcatsr »

Offline Prospect Avenue Coalition

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #67 on: June 29, 2009, 11:49:02 PM »
@Mark Bonamo, we tried to persuade Mr. Pineles to put this windowless monstrosity in his backyard but he NIMBY'ed us!

@Mayor Melfi, you can count on the ProspectAvenueCoalition (prospectavenuecoalition@yahoo.com) in conjunction with Summit and Overlook Avenues to not stop until we see an LTACH with a lovely wisteria filled park being built in Verona, New Jersey.

The Baridge House, The Camelot and The Blair House also had residents/neighbors meet with Mr. Zisa and other Council members. These meetings have been extremely well attended and are remarkably effective in rallying and informing the masses.

Hackensack Chronicle
Not in our backyard: City, residents to fight project
(by Mark J. Bonamo - June 29, 2009)

The close to 75 residents of the Whitehall high-rise building and other Prospect Avenue high-rises who met with City Attorney Joseph Zisa in the Whitehall’s basement on June 18 were looking for answers about a controversial construction project. And Zisa had an answer.

“This is all about the money,” Zisa said, referring to the proposed construction of a 24-story acute-care medical facility on Prospect Avenue. “The property is pretty much across the street from this one and there are some serious problems with the project.”

Zisa was joined by Mayor Michael Melfi as both city officials and residents expressed their concerns about a project that could significantly impact the quality of life of those residents living on or around Prospect Avenue.

Project owner also runs other facilities Bergen Passaic Long Term Acute Care Hospital LLC is seeking to obtain site-plan approval for the project, which would be built at 329 Prospect Ave. According to deed records, the company purchased the property, presently occupied by a residential home, in 2007 for $1.33 million.

If built, the facility, which city officials have indicated will have a ground floor of 7,250 square feet, would primarily provide adult day care and dialysis, as well as other medical services, and would include several driveways and an underground parking garage. City officials have also stated that the company will need more than a dozen variances in order to complete the project, including variances for use, parking and lot size. The site is currently zoned for residential and multi-family buildings.

Richard Pineles, the president of Bergen Passaic Long Term Acute Care Hospital LLC, also owns Prospect Heights Care Center, a 180-bed nursing home facility located close to the site, as well as Regent Care Center, a nursing home on Polifly Road. Pineles responded to a previous phone call seeking comment about the project by stating that it was company policy not to comment on a project that is pending and that is being proposed to the public.

Residents, officials display ire about project Zisa was blunt with his assessment of the project.

“This project is scary to me,” he said. “They have a very small piece of property on Prospect Ave., and three pieces of property on Summit Ave. they want to put five stories of underground parking under the Summit Ave. properties.”

“Summit Ave. has always been a one-family [residential] zone,” continued Zisa. “By allowing them to build under Summit Ave., you’re now allowing a commercial developer to encroach on that one-family zone. To me, that is a very dangerous precedent to set.”

“We really believe that this is a project that is terrible for Hackensack . It is not only bad for the character of Prospect Avenue and Summit Ave., it’s terrible for everyone who needs to get through town,” added Melfi, noting that the project would exacerbate traffic flow problems between Route 4 and Route 80.

After several people present at the meeting also voiced concerns about the neighborhood’s atmosphere and traffic in the wake of the potential project, longtime resident Jack McKinney dramatically pointed to another concern raised by the project: property values.

“If we don’t stop these people, we are going to virtually destroy our property,” McKinney said. “If you want to sell your place, sell it now. Because if these people come in, you couldn’t give it away. You’ve got to find some way to stop these people.”

Zoning Board meetings critical

Some residents have expressed concern about the considerable legal fees that could be incurred fighting this project, including the $125-per-hour standard municipal rate that the city is paying Zisa to speak at several high-rise resident meetings. However, Melfi defended the expenditure as money well spent.

“This is too important of an issue to not keep the momentum going. That’s why the council has decided to allow this to happen,” he said. “This is a slippery slope issue. If a high-rise building encroaches on Summit Avenue, all Summit Avenue could fall. The residents need to be informed about this issue, and have the knowledge that they need to come to the zoning board meetings, step up, and fight this.”

While residents and the administration have disagreed on controversial issues in the recent past, the majority of those present at the Whitehall meeting seemed to be strongly against the 24-story medical facility project.

“I’ve lived in Hackensack all my life, and I can remember when the whole area was beautiful,” said Sal Presti, 80. “This project will make it much worse. Unfortunately, money is the whole thing.”

“Traffic is atrocious now on Prospect Ave.,” added Presti’s sister, Carmela Rivers, 81. “We do not need this. We are vehemently against it.”

In expressing her opposition to the project, a Bristol House resident who was present at the Whitehall meeting pointed to existing difficulties encountered during nighttime walks on Prospect Ave.

“We have a lot of cars going down the street at 9:15 p.m.,” she said. “It’s a nice neighborhood to walk up and down in, but it’s hard to cross the street most of the time. I hope that this project can be defeated.”

City officials emphasized that a very important way to defeat the proposed project is to attend the city zoning board meetings at which the proposal is discussed. The next meeting was scheduled for June 25, after press deadline. They emphasized that while the council appoints the board members, the zoning board acts as an independent entity from the council.

“If nobody shows up, why should the zoning board think it’s a bad project?” asked Zisa. “If you don’t want to show up to these meetings, don’t complain after this is over. If you want to defeat the project… you have to go to the meetings.”

“You must stay engaged,” added Melfi. “You cannot stop. If we stop, we will fail.”

E-mail: bonamo@northjersey.com
« Last Edit: December 08, 2009, 08:02:31 AM by swapcatsr »

Offline Prospect Avenue Coalition

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #68 on: July 07, 2009, 12:04:11 AM »
#4043, we'd like to give a shout out to area residents: Nita, Charles, Will, Barbara and Dr. Len. We asked The Record to attend the next zoning board meeting on July 22nd. We told them that they were missing all the action!

Go up to the reporters (the Chronicle guy is young, wears dark frame glasses and has dark hair) during the zoning board meeting and get our message out via the news media! We will be calling the New York Times next.


Medical building project developer, residents debate
(by Mark J. Bonamo - July 06, 2009)


More than 200 city residents jammed City Hall for a June 25 zoning board meeting where the featured topic was the proposed 24-story acute-care medical facility to be built on Prospect Avenue. But in many ways, the residents’ concerns were expressed by one solitary citizen.

“You have indicated that this was an ideal site,” said Nita Kundanmal as she addressed Richard Pineles, the president of Bergen Passaic Long Term Acute Care Hospital LLC, the company that is seeking site-plan approval for the project. “Can you tell me why it is so ideal?”

As the evening went on, residents, who live close to the proposed building site, voiced their distress about a project that many see as far from ideal.

Proposed medical facility controversial

If approved, the facility would be built at 329 Prospect Ave. According to deed records, Bergen Passaic Long Term Acute Care Hospital LLC purchased the property, presently occupied by a residential home, in 2007 for $1.33 million. Company president Pineles also owns Prospect Heights Care Center, a 180-bed nursing home facility close to the site, as well as Regent Care Center, a nursing home on Polifly Road. Hackensack officials have indicated that the facility will have a ground floor of 7,250 square feet, and would primarily provide adult day care and dialysis, as well as other medical services. The facility would also include several driveways and an underground parking garage.

City officials have stated that the company will need more than a dozen variances in order to go forward with the project, including variances for use, parking and lot size. The site is currently zoned for residential and multi-family buildings.

Residents living in the high-rise buildings on Prospect Avenue and neighboring Summit Avenue have expressed serious qualms about the effects of the potential project, with the main complaints centering on quality of life, property values, traffic and environmental issues. Nearly 200 residents previously protested the proposed project at the May 14 zoning board meeting.

Company president, resident, go back and forth

Pineles proceeded to answer Kundanmal’s question about the suitability of the project site.

“The demographics of the area and Bergen County in particular are compelling,” he said, noting that the county has the highest population in the state and that a large population of residents aged 65 and older lives within close proximity to the site.

“We believe that we will provide over 500 permanent health care positions at this facility,” Pineles added.

“Do you realize that the character of the area is going to change with all of the construction needed for the project?” followed Kundanmal.

“I don’t think that the construction changes the character of the neighborhood,” said Pineles. “And I don’t believe that our facility as it is proposed will change the character of this neighborhood.”

Kundanmal proceeded to ask Pineles about the impact of increased traffic on the neighborhood if the project were to be completed.

“I would agree that there will be some more traffic. Considerably more, no,” Pineles said.

Kundanmal then challenged Pineles regarding the question of local property values being affected by the project.

“My general belief is that property values will improve and increase,” he said.

“If this kind of facility goes up… Hackensack will not be anything like it is now,” countered Kundanmal. “I won’t be living here that much longer [if it goes up] I imagine.”

Other residents speak out against project

During a break in the zoning board meeting, the majority of residents present seemed to be against the proposed facility.

“We don’t want this project,” said Prospect Avenue resident Charles Warren, 75. “It will disrupt the neighborhood, and traffic is going to be horrendous. There is no way that they can accommodate all of that traffic.”

“I’ve got some questions with regards to how this is going to impact all of the infrastructure, and what is the long-term impact on the taxpayers of Hackensack,” added Prospect Avenue resident Will Robinson, 65. “The infrastructure is already strained.”

Barbara Rubin, who lives directly across the street from the proposed project site, made a point about the planned facility to project architect Michael Szerbaty during the public comments segment of the meeting.

“What you have proposed is a very wonderful hospital. But aren’t you aware that it is being requested to be put into a residentially zoned area?” asked Rubin. “This is a residential neighborhood. We live there. And we don’t want you there.” “I live close by, and this [project] will change the character of this area,” said Dr. Leonard Burnett, 83. “We wonder if one large building of this kind is built, what will prevent another one from being built? At what point do you stop?”

When the Prospect Avenue resident was later asked if anything that he had heard at the zoning board meeting had changed his mind, Burnett got right to the point.

“It didn’t change it. It just reinforced it,” he said.

The next zoning board meeting is scheduled for July 22 at 7 p.m. at City Hall, 65 Central Ave.
 
E-mail: bonamo@northjersey.com

Offline Hack72

  • HackensackNow Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 39
  • Karma: 1
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #69 on: July 07, 2009, 08:59:59 AM »
I'm really glad to hear so many people are opposing this.  How can it possibly go through?  It needs a variance, and no one wants it.  It benefits no one but the company building it. 

I wish some of those vocal people were around 25 years ago when the beautiful homes on Prospect were being gobbled up to build the high rises they now live in.  Now THAT changed the character of the neighborhood.

Ironic, I think...

Yet I still support the opposers of this facility.

Offline elizabeth

  • HackensackNow Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: 1
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #70 on: July 07, 2009, 02:07:53 PM »
I am also opposing this proposed LTACH building....are you aware that Mr Pineles is requesting 14 variances from the adjustment board? This building should be built in the HCS (health care services) district, not on residential Prospect & Summit Avenues! Do you know that this building includes a 128 square foot trash compactor and an OXYGEN STORAGE TANK   on the north side of the building????!!!!
Oxygen is flammable- this is a danger to the neighborhood- and his building will not leave adequate space between buildings for firefighters! This building (it's really a hospital) will house 144 semi ambulatory patients on floors 6-17 and the dialysis areas are on levels 20-24----how do you evacuate these patients? Does the fire dept have ladders that reach above 6-8 stories?
The security & traffic  issues are real and should not be overlooked. This building requires 768 spaces
and only 402 will be provided in Mr.Pineles' building..so approx. 400 extra vehicles will be on our streets, with nowhere to park, so guess where they will all park?
So far, no geological studies have been done, and he wants to blast 5 stories underground for his parking garage!! Blasting---surely this could undermine the structures of nearby buildings!!

If this monstrosity is allowed to be built, the construction will cause untold air/dust pollution, in addition to clogging our streets with traffic. Two-three years of construction will cause irrreparable damage to the neighborhood. I chose to live here because I love living in a city like Hackensack and I do not wish to see my neighborhood destroyed. If you live on Prospect or Summit, your property values will go down and that will be the least of our problems!!

The statistics I write about are real and are in the Planning & Engineering Review submitted to the zoning board. Come to the next meeting on July 22 to protest this building.....it is outrageous that anyone can even consider building it on Prospect & Summit when there are places to build it  in the HCS district. This is not about the "need" for this facility, as Mr Pineles would have you believe, it's about the MONEY!!! He  owns Prospect Heights Care Center across the street as well as Regents on Polifly Road. What hubris to ask the zoning board for 14 variances!!!


Offline Prospect Avenue Coalition

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #71 on: July 11, 2009, 10:36:44 AM »
#4196: @Hack72, we appreciate your support of our opposition to Richard Pineles' plans to build a hospital at 329 Prospect Avenue which is currently zoned for residential and multi-family buildings. Perhaps your wish should have been for people to come and buy those houses which were torn down 25 years ago. According to the attached NYTimes article written in 1983 the conversion of Prospect Avenue began more than 45 years ago in an effort to forestall a deterioration of the area. Deputy city manager, Wilbur H. Lind II, feared that the area would experience a decline similar to Union/Park Streets with its transition to rooming houses and boarding homes. I have confirmed all of this with a family member of the builder who erected many of the high rise residential buildings on Prospect and Overlook Avenues and who happened to be on-site during the 1970s. Do you think that Mr. Pineles would have been lured to the neighborhood if it had deteriorated as anticipated?

At this moment Prospect/Summit/Overlook continues to be a vibrant residential neighborhood where people live. If I wanted to live next door to a hospital or over the railroad tracks or better yet -- on a block jammed with bumper-to-bumper traffic I could now more easily afford a move to Manhattan which I will now reconsider as I fear more a decline in my property value if the 14 or more variances are approved.

Join us on Wednesday, July 22 at 7 pm at City Hall, 65 Central Avenue and be vocal.

THE NEW YORK TIMES
ON THE RIDGE, HACKENSACK'S LUXURY ROW
By ANTHONY DEPALMA
Published: June 19, 1983
Illustrations: map of Hackensack, N.J. photo of James D'Agostino photo of high-rise apartments

HACKENSACK does not come readily to mind when discussing luxury housing in Bergen County. But along one six-block strip of Prospect A venue in that city are more than a dozen condominium, cooperative a nd rental apartment high-rises usually associated with the long s tring of luxury towers atop the Palisades in Fort Lee.

Prospect Avenue actually sits atop its own ridge. Although modest in comparison to the majestic Palisades, the ridge (sometimes referred to as ''the hill'' or Hackensack Heights) provides the same principal advantage - fine views of the Manhattan skyline - that have become almost an essential part of luxury housing in the area.

To the north and west, the towers offer vistas of the Ramapo Mountains. And even on hazy days, it is possible to see as far north as Rockland County, N.Y.

As spectacular as the views are, they in themselves would not have been enough to transform an avenue lined with a long row of stately old city mansions into a contemporary wall of residential towers. Above all, it was the location - just eight miles from Manhattan, making for easy commuting, yet far enough away to be considered the suburbs - that attracted the developers.

The conversion of Prospect Avenue began more than 20 years ago. Wilbur H. Lind, a deputy city manager and longtime resident of Hackensack, said that in the late 1950's old residents began moving out of the Prospect Avenue houses to the developing suburbs of northern Bergen County, such as Upper Saddle River, Tenafly and Westwood.

''The planning board back then saw what was going on and didn't want to repeat what happened on Union and Park Streets,'' he said. He was referring to an older section of Hackensack, once the site of the city's finest houses, that shortly after World War II quickly deteriorated into an area of rooming houses and boarding homes.

Hackensack rezoned the six blocks of Prospect Avenue from Essex Street to Passaic Street for high-density, multifamily housing in 1962, Mr. Lind said. Within just a few years, the first high-rises were constructed and both sides of the avenue are now almost walled in by buildings as tall as 21 stories with a total of more than 3,000 apartments.

The latest is also one of the most luxurious. The Camelot, at 245 Prospect Avenue, is a 21-story condominium with 78 units ranging in price from $175,000 to the double-sized penthouses for $480,000.

The Camelot, opened last October, was built on a 200-foot-square lot previously occupied by just two single-family houses. The condominium tower is an indication of just how far Prospect Avenue has come. The building offers many of the latest technological features - including solar-assisted heat pumps, an elaborate security system and even a computer-operated talking elevator. But the basic idea behind both the old and the new Prospect Avenues remains the same: Luxury for those who can afford it.

''We could probably knock off $30,000 in extras from the selling price and still have nice units,'' said James D'Agostino, chairman of J.D. Construction Corporation of Hackensack, developer of the Camelot. ''But this is designed for people who want the best.''

Mr. D'Agostino, who has built more than 3,000 single-family homes around the state, said he thought people were willing to spend up to almost a half million dollars to live in Hackensack, the Bergen County seat. ''The city has overcome most of its ills at this point,'' he said, ''and everything here is so convenient - Interstate 80 is just five minutes away, the malls are close by, even Teterboro Airport is just a few miles away.''

Mr. D'Agostino himself has decided to live in Hackensack. He has purchased one of the two 4,000-square-foot penthouses. He said he would move into it as soon as he sells his home in Tenafly. His own circumstances, he said, are typical of many of the dozen or so people who have already either purchased units at the Camelot or are planning to.

''A lot of my old clients, people for whom I built big houses around Bergen County 25 years ago, are in the same boat,'' he said. ''Their children are grown and gone, they do a lot of traveling, maybe they've got another place down in Florida. They don't want to take care of a big house anymore.''

Beverly E. Amadei, the Weichert Real Estate Company agent handling sales at Camelot, said many of the buyers were empty-nester couples who were selling big, single-family houses. BUT, she added, a number of younger professional couples, either w orking in Manhattan or right in Hackensack, were also interested in l iving in the Camelot because of the conveniences and the special f eatures, including a full gym, a pool and an all-weather outdoor t ennis court.

A number of the older high-rises that were originally rentals are now being converted to condominiums and cooperatives. Next door to the Camelot is the Bristol House, a 143-unit tower converted to condominium ownership 3 years ago. Kathleen M. Smith, the sales agent, said many recent purchasers were older couples and professionals transferred from other parts of the country.

Scattered empty lots remain on Prospect Avenue, and tucked in between the high-rises are a few surviving mansions. But their days are numbered. Eugene J. Duffy, Hackensack's chief planner, predicted that in 10 years, all the principal sites remaining on Prospect Avenue will be built on.

The city does not mind that, Mr. Duffy said, because the conversion of Prospect Avenue from single-family homes to multifamily high rises has brought Hackensack nothing but good.

''In terms of city services, the new buildings are built up to the latest codes and so they're safer,'' he said. ''Schools? Many of the new residents are young, unmarried or older, and most don't have kids with them. And from the tax point of view, these buildings pay many times more than the single-family houses were giving.''


Offline elizabeth

  • HackensackNow Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: 1
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #72 on: July 11, 2009, 11:47:54 AM »
Thanks for history info-I've only lived here 3 years and love living in a city such as Hackensack. You know I'm opposed to this proposed hospital that Mr. Pineles wants to  build on our streets. If the zoning board allows this to happen ( 14 variances!) then what is the purpose of having a zoning board? This hospital should be built in the HCS area which is zoned for this, not in a residential area!
Come to the next meeting on July 22nd and you will see the scope of this monstrosity building. You may also get to hear the disingenuous and condescending attitude of Mr.Pineles when he answers our questions. This traffic (400 extra cars daily) will affect not just Summit & Prospect, but have far reaching affects on Passaic, Overlook, Spring Valley, Clinton streets, etc as well. Plus, there are serious security and safety issues.....oxygen storage tank, tractor trailors delivering supplies and stopping traffic so they can  maneuver into his narrow driveways. He plans a 5 story underground parking garage and has not done geological studies yet!! This project will permanently alter and compromise our neighborhood.
   Come to the meeting on 7/22 at 7:30- We can make a difference if we are not indifferent to this
issue......

Offline Prospect Avenue Coalition

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
  • Karma: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #73 on: July 12, 2009, 01:02:15 AM »
#4228 - @Elizabeth, the Third Hackensack Special Zoning Board Meeting is at 7:00 pm on Wednesday July 22nd.

I did a little bit of looking around but could only find the initial certification date of January 5, 2000 for Prospect Heights. Does anyone remember when the application went to the Zoning Board? if the Zoning Board initially said NO and if it went to appeal then what happened. My only recollection is of the house that used to stand on that lot up until at least 1996. How did that Prospect Heights get built in this residential neighborhood? I am certain that there were variances that needed approval just like the 14 or more which Bergen Passaic Long Term Acute Care Hospital seeks approval for. Weren't there any vocal people living in the World Plaza and the Ritz Plaza? Hmmm, guess not. Can you imagine looking out your window onto that hideous looking eyesore. I definitely would have had to move. Do you keep the curtains drawn when potential buyers come to look at your unit?

Hey you young people (especially the ones living very near to 329 Prospect Avenue) -- you'd better wake up and get on down to the Zoning Board Meeting or before you know it your property values are going to get a kick in the pants harder than the real estate recession which hasn't hit this block that hard. The units in my building are still going for top dollar (just price checked unit which closed in June) but I don't live that close to proposed site. Oh and good luck getting out of your driveway in the a.m. Also, be careful when you dash across the street to catch the 162 bus. I'd be sure to increase my health insurance.

I hope to see some financially savy younger faces on the 22nd and not just the same more seasoned ones of late. Nothing is required of you. There are 2 parking lots, you don't have to pay anything to get in, there is no test at the end and you just sit there for approximately 2 maybe 2-1/2 hours. All we need are 200 people to show up. thx in advance for your support.

Offline just watching

  • Long-time poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 928
  • Karma: -25
    • View Profile
Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« Reply #74 on: July 15, 2009, 04:39:34 AM »
I'm afraid to answer this question, but since I was there, I will.  Most readers here know that Prospect Heights is a nursing home on the other side of Prospect Avenue from this site.

There was a small but determined contingent of people who were opposed, all were residents of Prospect Ave. They came without lawyers or expert witnessses.  Nobody testified from the Carver Park neighborhood to the east.  Most of the opposition was focussed on a magnificient European Beech that was centered on the property's front lawn. Residents in buildings on either side wanted the tree to remain, or for the building to be set further back so the tree would remain.  Other people spoke against the shape of the building being less than square, and it just being too bulky for the property.  And one person asked the board to simply to require brick exterior instead of tile; that it not be a "TILE BUILDING" because the tile is too institutional-looking.

The Zoning Board of Adjustment DENIED Prospect Heights.  Actually the vote was split, but if I recall correctly, they were one vote short of what is needed for a Type D Use variance. 

The developers appealed to Judge Jonathan Harris, and Harris voted to approve the project based on it being a special needs land use.  It may have even been remanded back to the board, with orders to approve it.

This is why Pineles is so arrogant that they can win.  They think history is going to repeat.

I've been saying all along that it is ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL not just to question the expert witnesses, but to have your own expert witnesses.  There has to be a stellar case against them. This is not a battle to convince the Zoning Board to vote NO, there is little doubt of that.  It's all about preparing for the next level, the appeal.

Tth