Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Whitey

Pages: 1 [2] 3
16
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Area in need of Rehabilitation
« on: September 02, 2014, 12:23:18 PM »
150-170 Main Street

The Planning Board has approved this 14-story residential and retail building on Main Street.  I put retail in italics because although the building will front on Main Street, only part of the ground floor will have retail space.   The redevelopment zoning code apparently requires 7,500 square feet of retail and that is what the developer has provided.  The remaining frontage on Main Street will apparently be a display window of some kind, but there will be no retail space behind the window.

Since the whole objective of the redevelopment plan is to revive retail on Main Street I find it amazing that the Planning Board would approve the application as proposed.

17
Hackensack Discussion / City Council Meeting
« on: April 09, 2014, 03:04:35 PM »
I understand that the Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 8, 2014 was rescheduled to Monday April 7, 2014.  The video states that the notice was posted in City Hall and advertised.  Did anyone find a notice on the City website? 


18
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 2/12 Storm Information
« on: February 28, 2014, 01:33:32 PM »
As of Thursday there were many streets where cars had been parked for weeks and where snow drifts remained.  Heath Place, for example, between  MHD and the Esplanade had cars and snow banks at both curbs, limiting traffic to one way.  Cars leaving the Parker School and heading east would start up Heath and then have to back out of the street to allow westbound cars to pass.

Callers to the DPW were asked to call the HPD to have the vehicles moved and callers to the HPD were told to call the DPW.  Speakers at the February 19 Council Meeting complained about the lack of coordination between the HPD and the DPW where residents were ticketed for not moving their cars and when they did, there was no snow removal activity.  I don't know about a snow committee, someone in the city just need to take charge of the effort.

19
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: January 02, 2014, 09:14:59 AM »
The Hackensack Building Department said the owner was issued all the necessary permits.  I don't know about notifying the residents.


20
Hackensack Discussion / Re: High School Resource Officer
« on: November 04, 2013, 09:29:16 AM »
Some of the articles about Hackensack appear to give conflicting reports. There seems to be general agreement that the HPD does not have a certified SRO on staff but it is not clear whether there is an officer assigned to duty inside the high school.  It would be a good idea to clear this up.

It seems as though Hackensack is not the only school system seeking funding for a School Resource Officer from the municipality.  See - http://www.nj.com/washington-township-times/index.ssf/2013/09/washington_township_school_boa_8.html.   It is clear that most municipalities do share the cost of the SRO, so let’s hope the City and the BOE can come to an agreement.


21
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 2013 Election
« on: October 03, 2013, 01:46:07 PM »
Interesting letter by former Mayor Muti of Ramsey:

The Record: Letters, Wednesday, Oct. 2
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 2, 2013, 11:05 AM
THE RECORD

Hackensack pays lawyers too much

Regarding "Hackensack ups the pay rate for outside lawyers," (Page L-3, Sept. 28):

The city of Hackensack has hit upon a unique crime-fighting idea, paying its lawyers more money so that they will be more honest in their billing practices.

"We’re trying to keep the process honest and make sure we’re paying a fair number," Hackensack spokesman Thom Ammirato said, according to The Record. "The lawyers taking the positions realize they’re getting a fair number, and they’ll be fair in their billing."

Overbilling by lawyers — that is, inflating time records so that clients can be charged for more time than was actually spent on their cases — is fraud, of course.

This Hackensack initiative could trigger a wave of like-minded, anti-crime reforms across the country, like doubling the salaries of mayors and other public officials as an incentive for them to refuse bribes. Or bringing pay-to-play out of the closet and making it legal.

Civil engineers, architects, planning consultants and lawyers would compete for public contracts using sealed bids, bidding not for the lowest cost of services to taxpayers but for the highest sums they are willing to contribute to politicians in power to get the public contracts.

Government of the people, by the people and for the people?  Of, by, and for which people? That is the question.

Richard Muti
Ramsey, Sept. 29
The writer is a former mayor of Ramsey.
- See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/news/opinions/226088061_The_Record__Letters__Wednesday__Oct__2.html?page=all


22
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 2013 Election
« on: August 26, 2013, 12:45:26 PM »
That is a very high salary for a Hackensack City employee.  NJ Public Employee records for 2012 (below) show that Mr. Rottino would be the 5th highest paid employee.  It is not clear whether he would have an office at City Hall and whether it would be staffed with City Employees.  This could wind up costing a lot of money.

NJ Public Employees, 2012

LOIACONO, STEPHEN    $167,303
CHRIST JOHN                 $153,850    
DAMORE JESSE  V      $141,164
KOSTER ADRIAN           $136,335
CARLSON ARTHUR  B   $125,258
HECK DEBRA  A                   $124,199

23
Hackensack History / Re: E. Frederick Morrow
« on: August 26, 2013, 09:15:51 AM »
See my post above (September 27, 2010).  The book, Way Down South Up North, is worth reading to understand Hackensack history.  Also, Nellie in the article, is Nellie K. Parker

24
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Area in need of Rehabilitation
« on: August 01, 2013, 09:47:18 AM »

CITY OF HACKENSACK ORDINANCE NO. 17-2013 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Ordinance No. 17-2013 of the City of Hackensack, County of Bergen and State of New Jersey, entitled: "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 ENTITLED 'ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES' OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD NEW ARTICLE VIII ENTITLED "DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT" was introduced and has passed its first reading at a meeting of the governing body of the City of Hackensack, in the County of Bergen, State of New Jersey, on July 22, 2013. It will be further considered for final passage after a public hearing thereon, at a meeting of the City Council to be held at City Hall, Council Chambers, 65 Central Avenue, on Tuesday, August 20, 2013at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be reached. Debra Heck, City Clerk CITY OF HACKENSACK ORDINANCE NO. 17-2013 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES" OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD NEW ARTICLE VIII ENTITLED "DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT" WHEREAS, the N.J.S.A. 40:48-1 et seq., (hereinafter referred to as the "Statute") provides that the Governing Body of every municipality may create an office or position necessary for the efficient conduct of the affairs of the municipality by way of ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City of Hackensack ("Hackensack") is in need of economic development services to ensure economic opportunity to the Hackensack residents and to enhance the City's vibrancy and development; and WHEREAS, the Governing Body of Hackensack has determined that, for reasons of efficiency and economy, securing a Director of Economic Development in the best interests of the City; and. WHEREAS, the Director of Economic Development will report through the City Manager; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK, as follows: SECTION 1. The City of Hackensack Municipal Code, Chapter 3 entitled "Administrative Offices," is amended to add new Article VIII entitled "Director of Economic Development" as follows: � 3-26. Director of Economic Development Established There is hereby created and established the position of Director of Economic Development in the government of the City of Hackensack. The Director of Economic Development's appointment by the City Council shall be at the pleasure of the Council, and this Director shall receive such compensation as shall be provided annually by ordinance. � 3-27. Duties It shall be the duty of the Director of Economic Development of the City of Hackensack to: A. Research, study and evaluate the economic development of the City of Hackensack on an ongoing basis, with particular attention to the development and redevelopment of areas within the city which may be appropriate for such consideration. B. Make recommendations to the Mayor and Council for the development of such areas and the zoning of such areas for residential or commercial purposes. C. Prepare such advisory reports and perform such other duties as may from time to time be requested by the Mayor and Council concerning the feasibility of certain proposed projects. D. Make recommendations to the Planning Board or the Board of Adjustment that may be requested concerning applications for development presented therein. E. Design and implement campaigns to attract industrial, commercial and other economic development into the City. F. Undertake an inventory and the securing and promotion of sites whose development is to the economic benefit of the City. G. Assist prospective developers in securing financing for development projects. H. Arrange and coordinate city services necessary for specific economic development projects. I. Keep appropriate statistics and data to indicate trends in economic development and make evaluations and recommendations concerning the same. J. Review and make recommendations concerning economic development aspects of the Comprehensive Master Plan of the City. K. Coordinate the City's economic development efforts with those of other governmental bodies and agencies. L. Administer all federal, state, county and local aid programs pertaining to economic development in the City, except as otherwise provided by law. SECTION 2. All other Ordinances or parts of Ordinances inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon final passage and publication as provided by law. ATTEST: CITY OF HACKENSACK By: Name: John P. Labrosse, Jr. Title: Mayor By: Name: Debra Heck Title: City Clerk July 31, 2013-Fee:$142.70(151) 3536531

Source: The Record, Hackensack, NJ, 07601

25
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Area in need of Rehabilitation
« on: May 06, 2013, 01:31:13 PM »
I found serveral references to mixed use.  See below.  Nothing specific.

 
Hackensack easing way for apartment building project
by Hannan Adely
NorthJersey.com
(HACKENSACK) - The City Council is taking steps to approve parking and financial agreements to make it easier for a North Jersey developer to build a 222-unit apartment building downtown.

The council introduced ordinances on Tuesday night to designate Meridia Metro Urban Renewal as the redeveloper of a portion of State Street and to allow a payment-in-lieu-of-taxes agreement and parking lease for the project, to be called Meridia State. City officials say the incentives are needed to make it viable and to pave the way for the first development in a part of downtown that the council has marked for rehabilitation.

Meridia, a subsidiary of Capodagli Property Co. of Pequannock, plans to construct a six-story building including a ground-floor garage with 141 spots and five floors of one- and two-bedroom apartments. The project, between Warren and Bergen streets, will cost an estimated $19.2 million.

One ordinance would name Meridia as the redeveloper for 90 days, during which the company and city can negotiate a redevelopment agreement.

The council is also weighing a change to the city’s code to allow the leasing of municipal parking lots and garages, and to approve one such agreement with Meridia. Under the agreement, the developer would lease 120 non-assigned parking spaces in the Atlantic Street Parking Garage for its residents at a cost of $64,800 annually for the first five years, with increases in years to follow.

Another proposed ordinance would offer a 30-year tax abatement on the State Street property.

For the first six years, the developer would pay either $1,200 per unit for a total of $266,400, or 2 percent of the total project cost, whichever is greater.

The payment would increase incrementally over the remaining years of the agreement.
In Years 7 to 11, the developer would pay the greatest among those two options and a third option — 20 percent of the property taxes that otherwise would have to be paid. In subsequent years, the third option would grow to 40 percent, then 60 percent, then 80 percent in the final eight years.

If the City Council approves the tax abatement agreement, as expected, it will go to the state Department of Community Affairs for final authorization.

The city now gets less than $80,000 in taxes for the properties in the State Street redevelopment area, said City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono. All the properties have been bought by Meridia, which is preparing to build soon.

On its application, the developer estimates that construction could start in June if approvals are in place by then, and would run until January 2015.

Meridia would be the first project to break ground since the city adopted its Downtown Rehabilitation Plan in June. The plan eased zoning, parking and other restrictions in a 39-block area known as the Main Street corridor to make it easier for developers to build downtown.

Last month, the council designated part of State Street as an “area in need of redevelopment” to allow a mixed-use project with up to 230 residential units.

Council members said they were willing to offer incentives and to compromise on taxes in a bid to transform the run-down block.

“We want to spark redevelopment,” Mayor Michael Melfi said. “This person is willing to take a chance and develop in this area.”

Councilwoman Karen Sasso said she hoped it would build momentum for all of the city’s Main Street corridor.

“Once this gets built and completed,” she said, “I think more people will come in here over time and look to make an investment in the community.”
March 6, 2013 News, Press Release

26
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Shared Services
« on: February 01, 2013, 10:59:23 AM »
See below - A typical example of resistance to shared services

Consolidation talk worries Teaneck police dispatchers
Friday, February 1, 2013

BY  DENISA R. SUPERVILLE
STAFF WRITER
The Record

Police dispatchers fear that they may lose their jobs if the township switches its dispatch service to the county from the current in-house operation.

But township officials say the discussions with Bergen County are still preliminary, and county representatives visited the Teaneck police headquarters on Wednesday only to examine the radio and telecommunications equipment and observe how the department is run.

The township initially planned to consolidate dispatch for the police and fire departments and ambulance services at the police headquarters — a move that would have increased the number of dispatchers to 14 from seven and allowed one firefighter to return to departmental duties.

However, when county officials said last month that they were considering providing services at the $12.4 million Public Safety Operation Center in Mahwah free to the municipalities, Teaneck expressed interest, Township Manager William Broughton said Thursday.

Since the center opened in 2010, only 20 of Bergen County's 70 municipalities have signed contracts to route their 911 calls through the center, including 11 that also receive dispatches for police officers, firefighters and ambulances.

"Economics is one part of the equation," Broughton said. "But it's also driven by the quality of service that they can provide."

Broughton said the county communications center provides services that are much more comprehensive than the township's Teaneck's. The county also has built-in backups that make its communications and radio systems more reliable, he said.

"It includes a high level of redundancy, and it may be a viable option for the township," Broughton said.

"If it's not free, we have to look at the cost. But because the county has said it may be free or some portion may be free, it's incumbent upon us as good stewards of the public's money to look at this. We have to examine it."

Courtney Challener, one of the seven police dispatchers, said her colleagues were first informed about a month ago that the township was considering switching, but they became more concerned when the county representatives showed up this week.

Although the dispatchers were told that if Teaneck switched, they could apply for jobs at the county center, there was no guarantee they would get those jobs, she said.

The county's starting salary is also lower, she said. Township dispatchers start at $43,653, under the union's contract, Broughton said.

But the dispatchers, some of whom grew up in Teaneck, were most concerned about how any possible switch could affect the public, she said.

The dispatchers know the officers and the township, which has a population of close to 40,000, and use that knowledge on a daily basis to quickly and efficiently respond to calls for assistance from both the public and from officers, she said.

"It's really not personal, I just don't think [the county] can handle it," she said. "We know they can take on the smaller towns, but Teaneck is a really huge town."

Police Chief Robert A. Wilson, who has toured the county facility, said he will not recommend any switch unless it's an improvement. The current equipment is aging, and some needs to be replaced, he said.

The county system "is certainly designed for doing large-scale multijurisdictional dispatch," he said.

"My real concern is to have this improved," Wilson said Wednesday. "We are not seeking the change for the sake of changing. It needs to be better. It needs to be as professional as possible. That's the goal."

Email: superville@northjersey.com


27
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Rehab the riverfront!
« on: August 01, 2012, 08:15:37 AM »
I think you will find that they are providing access, parking and a walkway with some seating.

28
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Costco
« on: May 18, 2012, 11:41:24 AM »
The Agenda for each zoning board meeting is posted on the City website.  If there was an application for 80 South River Street, it would be on one of the posted agendas.

29
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: January 09, 2012, 09:34:20 AM »
See this article in today's Record.  Medicaid funding seems to be drying up.


Day-care closure to leave seniors, disabled in lurch
Sunday, January 8, 2012    Last updated: Monday January 9, 2012, 6:38 AM
BY COLLEEN DISKIN
STAFF WRITER
The Record

One of the state's longest-running medical day-care programs for elderly and disabled residents is shutting down, a casualty of the growing funding headaches in New Jersey's long-term-care industry.

Staff member Ana Fernandes giving a gift bag to Dr. Hyman Levine at the Daughters of Miriam Center, which is ending the program in Clifton on Feb 3. Residents and their loved ones are scrambling to find other options when the Daughters of Miriam Center in Clifton closes the program on Feb. 3.

"I didn't sleep for two nights after they told us about it," said Susan Fenkanyn, 88, who has severe asthma that sometimes leaves her so short of breath that she has trouble walking.

It's possible that some of the center's 50 clients, particularly the 18 seniors enrolled in a day program for dementia sufferers, will have to enter a nursing home because their needs are beyond what family members can provide without some assistance, said Dr. Louis Chodosh, the program's medical director.

"There's no question that half of the people in the dementia program would be in a nursing home without the care they receive here," Chodosh said. If that happens with any of the Medicaid recipients in the program, Chodosh said, "it's going to cost the taxpayers and the government more money than it would to have them in this program."

Meanwhile, industry advocates warn the cuts to Medicaid and Medicare that are causing this program to close could force other facilities to cut their services.
The Daughters of Miriam Center is located in a building that also houses a 210-bed nursing home operated by the non-profit organization. It was one of the state's first adult medical day-care programs when it opened in 1975.

Such programs seek to offer the health monitoring and daytime companionship that can help keep seniors with chronic conditions from prematurely entering a nursing home. It is also an essential service to family members who need the help caring for their elderly loved ones.

The people enrolled in the program, and their families, were notified of the pending shutdown about a week before Christmas.

Carol Hamersma — whose 84-year-old mother, Betty, suffers from dementia and attends the program three days a week — said she was still absorbing the news of the closure and hadn't had a chance over the holidays to investigate other options.

The day program has been part of the patchwork of services Hamersma has pieced together to enable her widowed mother to remain in her Clifton home in spite of her disease's progression.

"We have some home care services that come to the house, and I stay over about two times a week," said Hamersma, a music teacher who lives in Woodbridge. "But a program like this is so worthwhile for her. It's part of being healthy that she has something to do. If she sits at home, it's the TV, and that's no substitute for getting out with people.

"Even if she doesn't remember all the names and the faces of the people,I can see that she's happy when she's here," Hamersma added.

Frank DaSilva, chief executive officer of Daughters of Miriam, said the non-profit decided to close the day program because it needs to plug a $1.2 million hole in its budget caused by steep Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement rate cuts to all nursing homes in the state.

The services provided by Daughters of Miriam's adult day-care program are not eligible for Medicare reimbursement, and only 21 percent of the participants are Medicaid recipients. So the program itself was not directly affected by those cuts. But DaSilva said the adult day care operated at a deficit the past decade and that the organization, which also operates independent living apartments for seniors, helped fund it with community grants and other donations it receives.

Now some of those donations — and money saved by closing the center — will need to be used to help keep the nursing home afloat. Like other nursing home administrators in the state, DaSilva was caught off guard when daily Medicaid reimbursement rates were cut by more than what was expected. In his facility's case, the rate dropped 5.3 percent instead of the expected 3 percent.

Since November, Daughters of Miriam also has laid off or reduced the hours of several employees to save what amounts to the salaries of eight full-time-equivalent workers, said DaSilva, adding that other cost-cutting measures will still be needed to address the funding shortfall.
 
Long-term care industry officials are plying state officials and lawmakers with requests to rescind at least a portion of those Medicaid rate cuts, but few hold out much hope that money can be found as New Jersey just went through a grueling year of budget cuts.

"This is one of many difficult choices that had to be made in balancing this year's budget," said Donna Leusner, spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Senior Services. "Medicaid funding for nursing homes represents nearly half of the budget of the Department of Health and Senior Services so it is very difficult to make cost reductions without affecting these facilities."

"Growth in New Jersey's Medicaid program coupled with a loss of federal funds resulted in a $1.4 billion reduction in the state's overall Medicaid budget, making program reductions necessary," Leusner said in a statement. "Unfortunately, this is the reality in states across the country."

At the same time that the state's Medicaid budget took a hit, the federal government also rolled back Medicare reimbursement rates to nursing homes. Industry advocates say they have no hope of winning back any of those federal Medicare dollars and instead are trying to get state lawmakers to realize that more facilities, besides Daughters of Miriam, may be soon be forced to cut services.

Daughters of Miriam staff members have spent the past few weeks researching alternative services for the 50 seniors, who attend the center between two and five times a week, depending on need. Just as it's possible that some of the sicker patients could end up in a nursing home, program directors say it's also possible that some of the healthier ones will resist switching to a new program where they don't know anyone. Those patients will end up spending more days alone, with their medical needs untended, officials said.

Fenkanyn, a longtime Passaic resident, said she doesn't think she will be comfortable in one of the alternative day programs recommended to her, because the participants there primarily speak Spanish. Instead, she's inclined to stay home this winter and "get started early on my spring cleaning" and try to find a new program later.

At 89, Herb Adelman is one of the healthier patients served by the program. He attributes that to the regular medical screenings hereceives from the nurse on staff. And he partly credits the regular company and recreational outings for his ability to live independently despite a heart condition that requires participation in cardiac rehab three days a week.

"They keep us busy here, and that's the point," said Adelman, a widower who still lives in the home he's owned for 45 years in Passaic Park. "That's what keeps me going."

Email: diskin@northjersey.com


30
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: October 27, 2011, 11:19:39 AM »
I thought this would be applicable to the LTACH construction.  From The Record

Valley's expansion will face number of Ridgewood regulations
Wednesday, October 26, 2011   
BY BARBARA WILLIAMS
STAFF WRITER
The Record

RIDGEWOOD — About 22,000 truckloads of soil and bedrock would have to be hauled away from The Valley Hospital site if its plan to expand is approved, according to an expert hired by the village.
 
To deal with that many construction vehicles, Ridgewood would need to restrict the hours dump trucks can haul excavated soil out of the village and work with the hospital on the traffic routes that will be used, said Christopher Rutishauser, the village engineer.
 
The 100 daily dump truck trips necessary to remove all the soil and bedrock would have to work around school drop-off and pick-up times, he said.
 
“There will probably be between 12 and 15 cubic yards per truck — that’s a good amount,” Rutishauser said. “They’ll have to apply for a soil permit from the village and that permit has a lot of conditions.”
 
Rutishauser’s comments followed a presentation by a geologist Monday night to the village council on the hospital’s proposal to grow to 1.17 million square feet.
Laurence Keller, the geologist, said the excavation would require 22,000 dump trucks -- a dozen an hour, eight hours a day. He also noted that a half-million gallons of water will have to be pumped from the site daily during construction, affecting the groundwater within a 1,000 to 1,500-foot radius of the hospital. Keller noted that the excavation could cause home foundations near the site to crack.
 
The council is considering whether to approve, deny or alter a vote by the Planning Board to allow the $750 million project.
 
On Tuesday, hospital spokeswoman Megan Fraser said the points Keller brought up have already been addressed by hospital professionals.
 
 “All of the concerns will be part of the developer’s agreement, which is a very comprehensive document and we’ll create it with the input of the village and the board of education,” Fraser said. “You have to remember anything that will affect the neighbors will affect our hospital buildings and patients first. We’ve developed plans to successfully resolve each of the issues.”
 
Fraser said surveys will be done on homes before and after the construction to determine if the hospital is responsible for any damage.
 
Concerned Residents of Ridgewood, a group opposed to the project, say the plan is just too big for the 15-acre site. Some fear their foundations will crack from the vibrations of the excavation. They also say the new 94-foot building will be too close to the Benjamin Franklin Middle School.
 
“When you go 17 feet below groundwater, 94 feet up and need 22,000 trucks to clear the site, at what point is the tipping point for being too large for the site?” asked Pete McKenna, president of Concerned Residents. “I understand there may be some negative effects to the hospital but it is reaping all the benefits.”
 
E-mail: williamsb@northjersey.com


Pages: 1 [2] 3
anything