Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - just watching

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 62
61
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Bergen County DPW/PD (Proposed)
« on: November 08, 2014, 01:26:49 AM »
And Hackensack gains WHAT from this.  Nothing as I see it.  It becomes another road for the city to pay to pave and maintain over time.

There's going to have to be major traffic reconfiguration for the redevelopment of the Zabriskie street property.  Let the County pay for that portion which is County roads, and after the development is completed, then transfer the roads to Hackensack.

62
that looks like a tornado to the left of the lightning.  Or is it just the angle of sight here.

63
Haha.  You'll have to fight with the Native Americans on that one.  There's clams and oyster shells back there, evidence of Native American settlement onsite at one time. They surely would want it for a casino site, and maybe knock out a few houses on Summit Ave while they are at it.

64
Just for laughs, I have a few possible land uses to offer  I am going to beat David Letterman on the top 10 potential uses:

First, the County could buy it and make a bigger homeless shelter, enough to accommodate 1000 homeless people from throughout the Northeast United States.  And the existing homeless center could be sold to a hotel chain, perhaps a Super8 ?

Second, Hess could make a new oil tank farm, to replace the one they are selling in Bogota.  And to restore the land to it's former use before the Price Club was built.

Third, the land could be claimed by a Native American tribe as "ancestral land" and developed as a casino

Fourth, it could fit at least a dozen bail bonds shops

Fifth, more parking for HUMC, complete with bus service to the hospital

Sixth, Hackensack police can buy it and make another burger and ribs place to compete with Cubby's who they want to run out of business

Seventh, a drive-through movie theatre, since there are none left in NJ

Eighth, wetland restoration area and a canoe launch for the Hackensack Riverkeeper

Ninth, a couple hundred units of garden apartments to serve as transitional housing for inmates being released from the Bergen County Jail

and

Tenth, this could be larger space for that Fu*king Smoke Shop, once recreational marijuana is legalized in NJ

65
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Masonic Temple (State and Warren)
« on: October 27, 2014, 07:03:43 PM »
I am glad they are considering these issues.  Thank you.

My immediate concern is the park design.  Will it incorporate the need for a rear addition to the building and driveway for trucks.  Not saying to build that addition NOW, just saying that whatever the park design is, it's got to be set back for future building expansion.  Or does the city want to pay more in the future to redesign the park again.

66
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Proposed Light Rail Stations for Hackensack
« on: October 26, 2014, 08:39:15 PM »
Let Englewood have the extension of the light rail.  Hackensack is better off waiting for commuter rail, not light rail, on the Susquehanna.

67
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Masonic Temple (State and Warren)
« on: October 25, 2014, 11:56:57 PM »
I need to make an important observation:  This facility has no backstage area.  ZERO. NOTHING.  A major rear addition will be needed

I was inside this buidling today after "Make a Difference Day", and I took an unauthorized peak upstairs.  I was interested in the floor plan of the main room, the stage, the backstage, and main seating area.  When I was in college, I worked as a stage hand at a performing arts center. I helped with props and calibrating the lights, and I even worked the shows.  I have some knowledge on these needs.

With this facility, there is nowhere to build props, store props and set up props, there is nowhere for a backstage changing rooms and restrooms specifically designated for the artists, there is nowhere for a control room for the theatre lighting system that is surely to be installed, there is nowhere for a sound system or setup area for any outside sound systems brought in by the artists, and the biggest problem is there is no loading dock connected to the backstage area.  As I see it, this building is going to need a rear addition with at least a 1500 sf footprint (30 x 50) if this is ever going to be any kind of cultural arts center. That 1500 sf footprint means 1500 sf on the first floor AND 1500 sf on the second floor where it is really needed, total of 3,000 sf.  And the logistics will have to include a driveway to Warren Street or Atlantic Street long enough for a big truck, leading to a loading dock that will be part of the addition.  I guess the loading dock will have to be closer to one corner of the building, and the addition will be an irregular shape to include the loading dock.  And then some kind of wide staircase leading upstairs to the main hall to move equipment. Or perhaps a work elevator. It won't be perfect or pretty, but it will be functional.  I don't see the addition costing less than $600,000, and maybe much more. And there's a need for a few parking spots in the back, for the smaller trucks and vans associated with the performers, which will be unloading all sorts of stuff.

In addition, the bathrooms for visitors that are in the front of the second floor are woefully deficient and small, and since space is a premium, these will have to be moved to the lower level. The whole building is going to need sprinkler system, and probably major electrical work.  And the rear addition will need to have TWO emergency exits, one in each corner, each leading to a separate staircase.  There is no way that this facility is going to open without rear emergency exits, due to fire codes.  So there is a 100% chance of some kind of construction work on the rear side of the building.

On the plus side, the tall roof/ceiling in the main room will allow for some upper level seating if the city desires to construct it, and there is plenty of space to make a movie-control room above the 2nd floor entrance hallway.  There could be showings of movies for the community here.  We don't have a movie theatre, but this use can be incorporated here.

The need for a rear addition is going to have to be considered now, so that the PARK can be planned correctly.  Otherwise you'll be cutting into the park in the future to expand the building and parking for the "show" vehicles.  So let's get this right, folks.  A couple million is going to be spent here, for everything.  Basically what you have is the shell of a building, as far as the Arts center floor is concerned, without the needed backstage area.  Not sure what the city plans for the lower level.

68
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Affordable Housing funds
« on: October 24, 2014, 09:37:42 PM »
Well, rents and houses for sale are both ridiculously overpriced in New Jersey, compared to similar housing in other states.  I can rent a whole house in Ohio or central Virginia for $800 a month, and that's a relatively new suburban house with 3 bedrooms.

Some sort of affordable housing is needed for New Jersey.  The one thing I do agree with the governor and foes of affordable housing is that THE BUILDER'S REMEDY has to go.  The idea of destroying zoning and open space for such housing is not acceptable.  I offer a few alternatives:

(1) A zoning solution.  Require that no municipality may reserve more than 75% of it's housing stock in the form of single-family houses and condominiums.  Areas reflecting 25% of each town will have to be rezoned to allow houses to be subdivided to create affordable units, or new construction including affordable units.  Every municipality should be required to have its zoning allow 10% of the housing stock to be multi-unit, in redevelopment areas or adjacent to local business districts.  So instead of builders deciding zoning changes by lawsuit, towns will have local control in deciding where the multi-unit can go

(2) encourage trailer parks and trailer homes, with reasonable criteria of trailer separation. No packing them like sardines in Moonachie.  And have them count as affordable housing.   State and federal land used for military purposes can be found for some of this.  I am sure, for instance, that places like Fort Dix and Piccatiny Arsenal can give up 100 acres for trailers, and there will be no impact at all to the facilities.

(3) encourage more rehab's of older apartment buildings in urban areas.  For Hackensack, I could see 275 Beech Street converted into affordable condominiums. That's a win-win for everyone. And it will encourage ownership.

69
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Statue
« on: October 14, 2014, 08:45:07 PM »
I am glad they were not offended, and you were working with them.  I believe that it is a general rule at these types of events not to post photos before an unveiling. 

70
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Statue
« on: October 12, 2014, 07:09:21 PM »
After attending today's event, I realize it was quite inappropriate that one of our top contributors posted photos of the statue before the unveiling.  Bad move.

71
Hackensack History / Re: Name-dropper: Ralph S. Demarest
« on: October 04, 2014, 04:53:52 PM »
There are a great many Demarest's who have been prominent residents of the City of Hackensack from the mid-1600's onwards. It's a prominent name in the history of Hackensack and Bergen County.  And at least one served as Mayor of Hackensack, I believe around 1960.  Demarest Place is named for one of them, but probably not Ralph or Gene. 

72
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Police Office Allen Fednik Memorial
« on: October 02, 2014, 06:19:16 PM »
OK, so there's some older cops who remember that day. They know the real story.  And they aren't talking.  Let's just rewrite history.

73
Hackensack Discussion / Re: HFD saves Church
« on: September 29, 2014, 09:18:52 PM »
Not sure how old the church is, but this 1913 map shows a vacant lot where the church now stands.  I would guess that it was built within 10 years afterwards.

http://www.wardmaps.com/viewasset.php?aid=10569

74
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Changing Hackensack's Form of Government
« on: September 28, 2014, 08:11:25 PM »
Successful collection of the signatures will force a special election within "x" days. Unsure how many is the "x".  It doesn't have to coincide with the November election, so there is no pressure, no timetable.  I would like to see someone post the reasons for the change.  That way people can decide if it is a good idea or not.

And if they need 4,000, they better collect 5,500, because a certain percentage will be invalidated for one reason or another.

75
Hess Oil tanks are coming down ! Good riddance to that industrial eye-sore.  What's going to be built there.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 62