Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
I don't know who these people are. Maybe related.  Maybe not. 
It's funny, when I was 18-19 years old and trying to establish credit the Sears credit card was super hard to it was some secret society where no one without excellent credit could be a part of.
Hackensack Discussion / The invasion of the safety-vested photographers has begun
« Last post by BLeafe on June 25, 2017, 04:22:00 PM »
At about 9:20 this morning, I saw these two safety-vested people walking up and down State St between Ward and Passaic, taking a picture every 30 or 40 feet or so - first of the rehab property from this side of the street and then aimed in my direction from the property side of the street. I wonder if he got a picture of me taking his picture. I wonder if they get double time for working on Sunday. How can I get in on this?

I'm just guessing this is connected to the rehab project and not to conversion of State St to two-way, which starts a week from this Wednesday.

Maybe I should start separate threads for whatever I shoot of both projects.

Whaddaya think, boss?

Click to enlarge.

......or so The Record would have you believe - twice - in today's paper (assuming you don't know how to spell):
(Sasson would like this one)

Click to enlarge:

Hackensack Discussion / Re: Main/State conversion to two-way begins on July 5
« Last post by BLeafe on June 24, 2017, 09:06:05 AM »
In case you haven't heard:

Hackensack Discussion / Re: Teterboro Airport
« Last post by Editor on June 23, 2017, 02:35:12 PM »

Letter: Current Teterboro Airport flight path still dangerous

A recent article about the noise, pollution and public safety issues involving Teterboro Airport omitted some important facts. Although the story accurately stated that a large crowd of area residents attended a recent Federal Aviation Administration hearing in Hackensack, it failed to hold FAA officials accountable for scrapping the trial of a much better and safer alternative flight path than the current system in place.

The story left many readers believing that the alternative path had been given a fair trial by the FAA. This is completely false. Many residents believe the exact opposite — that it was set up to fail. Here’s why.

The vast majority of the jets that use Teterboro land with the help of a Flight Management System that guides them along the current flight path following a charted course. But pilots using the new alternative flight path had a much more difficult challenge. They couldn’t use their FMS without manually entering longitude/latitude coordinates because the FAA didn’t provide them. So these pilots had to land “on their own” without using their automated FMS equipment.

With an obstacle like that, no one should be surprised that just one-quarter of one percent of the 90,000 flights in and out of Teterboro during this six-month “trial” actually tried the new alternate path. This is why many people believe this entire process was essentially a smokescreen to protect the status quo.

We do not accept the FAA explanation, or the noise, pollution and flat-out danger of the current flight path, which brings about 500 planes dangerously close to high-rise buildings on Prospect Avenue and the ever-expanding Hackensack University Medical Center every single day. Imagine the carnage and loss of life that would result if a plane crashed into one of these tall buildings, just as one crashed into an empty smaller building a few weeks ago. We know there is a better, safer way, and it deserves a fair trial by the FAA.

John Labrosse
Hackensack, June 19

Kathy Canestrino
Hackensack, June 19

The writers are the mayor and deputy mayor of the city of Hackensack
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]