Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Hope Donnelly

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Services for the homeless...
« on: June 02, 2006, 03:39:41 PM »
As usual, Mr. Aaron hits the nail on the head.  A big part of the problem IS the lack of quality services in Bergen County, yet NIMBYs are afraid of expanding services.   Doing so could alleviate problems.   I've never met a more conservative bunch of social workers than in the agencies of Bergen County, and by conservative I mean that they are of the opinion that any and all problems can be fixed solely by taking personal responsibility.  There are no outside factors influencing why someone is poor or homeless.    Any Social Services 101 classes teaches that liberal and radicals are more likely to go into this field, but they sure don't seem to be here.   It's as if Bergen County just can't admit it has a poverty problem.


Keith Standish was such a nice person under his scruffy appearance.    He had stunningly blue eyes.  I can hear the laughter at the musical mess-up at the memorial service.   Many of the "street people" possess a great sense of humor.  They need it, as there certainly is no grief counselling for them.   They are thrown together and labelled homeless, and as a group have lost something like 8-10 of their peers since January 2005.   

32
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 211 Passaic Street DESTROYED
« on: May 31, 2006, 07:39:51 AM »
I'm making it shorter  :) (but it isn't  ::) )

It will be interesting to see what the numbers were from the recent homeless count.   The family shelter closed last year and didn't reopen, and at the time of the count, Peter's Place and Orchard St. overnight were closed.   Does anyone know if the numbers dropped?  I know there were several deaths over the last year, as well.

Letters to county officials, CAP and Hackensack looking for more information on what exactly is going to be offered have gone unanswered, except for a form letter from the freeholders' office.   This shelter might not be an expansion but a reduction of beds and services but the PR make it look like it will take care of a host of problems.  If it is run the same way as the others, it will not, and Hackensack might see more homeless because it looks attractive.

Would expanding services increase the number of homeless?  Probably, if the county keeps doing business as usual.  One has to think about quality of services vs quantity.   Peter's Place has expanded its intern program, which is essential for training effective social workers.    Many of the social workers I've met had no experience with homeless people and were afraid of them.   This fear lets people fall through the cracks like the two guys I located family for and sent home.   Both were utilizing county facilities for years and somehow no one had bothered to question them about where they came from because they can't or won't spend enough time getting to know their clients.  They were both quiet, nice men, developmentally disabled and also very afraid.  The two no-questions-asked nonprofits, FAITH and Peter's (one more than the other), need to be here in order to pick up where CAP's abilities end.

Existing services need to clean up their acts.   CompCare (or is it CarePlus?) on the corner of Ward and Main, transports residents of group homes from other towns and dumps them off in Hackensack.  A formerly homeless woman who is now in a group home in Emerson, spends her day with the homeless from about 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.   That is her day program and that of a van load of other women.  WTF?

I was happy that Lawrence Aaron commented on police from other towns dropping off their homeless in the middle of the night.   As always, it is the centuries-old stigma of being poor or mentally ill which is really the issue.   Housing such as Common Ground's is a cost-effective idea.   It is not an expansion of homeless services, but housing that can work anywhere and prevent homelessness.   Instead of spending gazillions on architectural plans for shelters, why not buy up some houses for 3-4 people in towns that are bringing Hackensack their homeless.    Either have the county own them or hold private owners very responsible, like the Hackensack detective who owns a boarding house is.  Offering housing for the lowest of incomes AND something for them to do, whether paid or volunteer, which is always left out of the picture, would reduce the street loitering which is often mistaken as homeless behavior.   Replacing low income neighborhoods with luxury housing is going to increase the homeless problem.   

Again, another expansion would be housing and care for the worst of the mentally ill that don't belong on the streets of any town.   Bergen Regional has the room, which could be used for supervised housing, not hospitalization, as it is against the law to commit mentally ill people.   There are so many other ways of dealing with the homeless problem besides building bigger shelters.   

33
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 211 Passaic Street DESTROYED
« on: May 24, 2006, 04:21:42 PM »
Tom,

You are right!

I'm not pigeon-holing anyone.  Common Ground's ideas would work in OTHER towns as well as in Hackensack.   Monitored housing several notches in quality above 211 Passaic St, where residents would use their monthly checks to pay their rent  (as opposed to having several hundred dollars in their pockets while staying in shelters) would work.

I've hooked up with a housing advocate (for the middle class) in Asbury Park, where new condos starting at $1.2 million are going up among the slums.   Pretty soon we'll need shelters for people making $50K :o

Thanks, Editor, for posting the  link to Common Ground.   The NY Times article, "Making a Flophouse a Home, and a Decent One at That" is available free if you register.   The article ran on 4/30/06.

34
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 211 Passaic Street DESTROYED
« on: May 23, 2006, 05:57:16 PM »
Still not getting the point, Eric.   

I think the county should investigate what a group like Common Ground in NYC is doing with former "flop houses".

35
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 211 Passaic Street DESTROYED
« on: May 22, 2006, 05:18:18 PM »
One of the men injured in the fire has cancer, a colostomy, and is developmentally disabled.  The one who jumped from the second floor window, lost his brother on New Year's Eve - he was hit by a car on route 4.   The family history of both these individuals is very sad, that of neglect, poverty, and mental illness.  When you actually get to know "The Homeless", you realize how much inequality there is in any help that may have prevented homelessness, alcoholism, drug addiction, etc.   The Homeless are individuals with appalling histories.   Most of the ones who are alcoholics were full blown alcohoics by their early teenage years.  Eric, do you know what parts of the brain get affected by alcohol?    (Scientists know - you could Google it). 

Do you know how malnutrition before alcoholism can lead to depression and affect the same parts of the brain that alcohol does - thiamine deficiencies, for example?

Do you know what it is like to be developmentally disabled - which most of the The Homeless are, if they are not schizophrenic, bipolar or suffering from post traumatic stress disorder?   These can all be treated, if you have money and if the system feels you are worth it.    How would you like to leave your doctor's office knowing he or she doesn't think you are worth it?   




36
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 211 Passaic Street DESTROYED
« on: May 19, 2006, 04:29:56 PM »
Anyone who takes the time to research all perspectives on addiction knows it is not as simple as extreme selfishness.

37
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 211 Passaic Street DESTROYED
« on: May 19, 2006, 08:10:35 AM »
No, Eric, it is not about the housing stock but the opinion that everyone is cut from the same cloth, that their situation is a choice - selfish hearts and selfish minds.    That is as far from reality as it gets.   It is a lack of understanding that sews the seeds for NIMBY.

Housing advocates are up in arms about the Maples in Rutherford and elsewhere.    We spend lots of time trying to convince local authorities, work with the governor's people, our Senators, etc. on trying to find solutions for people who cannot, for a complex variety of reasons, take care of themselves.  "Poetry" like yours hinders anyone and everyone trying to come up with solutions.

38
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 211 Passaic Street DESTROYED
« on: May 18, 2006, 10:02:02 PM »
All-knowing Eric Martindale, I'm glad to see that you know the hearts and minds of  all those who lived at 211 Passaic Street.   It is because of thinking like yours that nothing will ever change.

39
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Services for the homeless...
« on: April 26, 2006, 04:03:39 PM »
Other liquor stores are on State St. across from the State Street Hotel and new condos (I think it is Simon Sez), Parisi's on South State, which is a great Italian deli that also sells the 22-24 oz beers for a buck, Rojas' on Hudson; Georges, also, up on Anderson. 

Since the shelters empty out early in the a.m., the location will not really make a difference for this crowd.

I learned that one of the worst drinkers, but one of the nicest homeless guys, died in HMC last week.  It seems the "regulars" are dying off.  However, talking with a woman who volunteers in one of the shelters, a "nice looking 21-year-old" from Cresskill was hanging out at a drop-in center with no place to go.   He had moved to NYC, didn't do well there, so came to Hackensack for services.  More of these kinds of clients are showing up looking for services - kids from "good homes" who don't have a clue as to how to take care of themselves or who have mental disorders that were missed or ignored. 

I haven't heard what kind of services will be offered at the new shelter.   A long time ago, in The Record, if I'm recalling correctly, they were talking about a medical clinic, social workers, etc.    There are social workers now who will not deal with the developmentally disabled homeless because they do not (cannot) follow through with simple directions.   

It isn't clear yet, though rumor has it, that Orchard St. CAP will close when the new shelter opens.   That at least would keep the homeless (and not-homeless) from having dinner and walking through town to get to shelters, rooming houses, and camping areas after 5 p.m.   It would also mean more people sleeping outside.  When FAITH Foundation closes, which is a good thing and a bad thing, it will be interesting to see where their clients end up.

40
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Services for the homeless...
« on: April 25, 2006, 05:41:54 PM »
Do the planners really think this location will make that much of a difference?  The homeless people who are alcohol-dependent, walk each Sunday morning to Little Ferry, where the liquor stores open early.   As long as there is low cost beer and vodka available at the stores on Main, Hudson and South State Streets., homeless people and those who people believe are homeless will be panhandling and buying in Hackensack.  Not all who panhandle and loiter are homeless, either.

41
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Services for the homeless...
« on: January 06, 2006, 08:00:11 PM »
I'm sure notes of sympathy and condolences would be appreciated by the homeless clients of FAITH Foundation.   

Homeless folks don't have access to grief counselling nor do they have people who would send them a sympathy card. 

The address for FAITH is 86 State Street, and the client was James Williams.   

Today was also the one-year anniversary of the suspicious death of Cindy Russell, a tiny homeless woman who helped out at FAITH.   

42
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Power Surge
« on: January 05, 2006, 08:18:56 AM »
Okay - this is weird.   I was in Maywood at a friend's house,  nearly a straight run up from Euclid, a few blocks south of Bergen Mall.   The Christmas tree lights seemed brighter on and off, as did the dining room light.   They did not go off completely.  I thought it was my eyes but Hubby noted it also.  I don't recall the time, but it was Tuesday evening as we had already eaten dinner. 

43
Hackensack History / Re: W.T. Grant Co. & Kresge stores
« on: January 03, 2006, 07:10:08 PM »
I love this stuff!   W.T. Grant's was one of my favorite places to go with Mom.   We went to the one in Wyckoff.   I still remember going to Santa who seemed to be situated in a closet.  He was there every day, all day, from Thanksgiving until Christmas Eve.  I recall going to either Two Guys or Corvettes on Essex Street.   I'm not sure if their actual location was Lodi, Hackensack or Maywood, however.

44
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Services for the homeless...
« on: January 03, 2006, 03:19:54 PM »
I'm saddened to read the news about James Williams, and my heart goes out to the two drivers who hit him.  James Williams was a very nice person under his frightening appearance.  I spoke with him on many occasions on the street, saw him in the ER, where he spent many a day and night.   When I saw him walking in traffic just two days before he died, I wondered if it was a miracle that had kept him from being hit by a car sooner.   He and I, a social worker in the ER, and even the security guard, talked about him getting rehab, planning a life after rehab, and getting back on his feet.   Although he thought it all sounded good, he never sounded like he believed it was possible.   If it doesn't come from within, how does rehab happen?  This is the problem for those who never got on their feet to begin with, who never had any hope.

45
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Services for the homeless...
« on: January 03, 2006, 08:12:49 AM »
A while back I posted about mentoring the homeless.   After doing so for six months with one particular person, I was unable to continue with him.  Two more have done well.    Follow uo to July 2006, the former is still in housing, having on and off problems with drinking, but still in housing, which for him is a miracle.   That means he's cashing his own check, paying his rent and hasn't caused enough trouble to be evicted.

The causes - abandonment and neglect - are very, very profound.   Perhaps it is not possible to overcome this because of the complexity of it.   What does years of malnutrition, emotional neglect, alcohol or drug use starting at an early age, lack of education, and lack of love do to a child?  These are the homeless - especially the street people who seemingly don't want to be helped.   

Mentoring helps only a little bit.   A team of mentors is actually needed for each person, but we know that is impossible.  There are barely enough social workers with expertise in the issues of homelessness, other than obtaining benefits and services. 

I've met so many wonderful people at New Hope Baptist Church, Center for Food Action, Salvation Army, Bergen County CAP, people who accept our hopeless cases for what they are.   It's very sad to say nothing can be done, but in many cases, nothing can be done.  The best we can do is not judge, treat them all like human beings that they are, and make sure all children, from ALL walks of life, are being nutured.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4