Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bergen07601

Pages: [1]
1
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: September 23, 2013, 10:56:34 PM »
So, nice win for Prospect Avenue residents. Yes, our presence counted. Big round of applause to Karen Hull/Prospect Avenue Coalition who continuously organized and announced the developments of each meeting. Clap, clap, clap. Her efforts drove us to each meeting over the past few years in this sometimes tedious and boring battle. Let's applaud ourselves too. We fought and won in the face of the developer's big $$$.

And he is on to his next project. More commercial use of our beautiful residential neighborhood.
For those of you who are interested and can attend a public hearing on October 2, 2013, at The Bergen County Utilities Authority, Administration Building, Foot of Mehrhof Road, Little Ferry, New Jersey, at 10:00 A.M. in the Public Meeting Room. See the thread re Prospect Heights Medical Waste Treatment Expansion at http://www.hackensacknow.org/index.php/topic,2791.0.html. Please post your comments if you attend.

2
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: March 03, 2011, 12:08:37 AM »
Turns out we have a few more opportunities to save Prospect Avenue. Everyone: Bring as many friends and relatives as you can with you so we can pack the room. The last meeting should have been standing room only like it was at the beginning stages of the hearings. Where is everyone? Let's keep up the pressure -- the hearings will soon be over and we will know Prospect Avenue's fate. We've gotten this far because of those who  made the effort to attend every meeting and be heard. We are in the home stretch -- we need a great turn out tomorrow.  I will reiterate: Please just show up: be seen and be heard if the opportunity presents itself. Saying "I object" or "I am against the building" will suffice.

3
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: January 13, 2011, 12:30:09 AM »
This is our LAST CHANCE to save Prospect Avenue. Bring as many friends and relatives as you can with you so we can pack the room. The last few meetings were poorly attended. Get the word out now. If everyone who has a stake in the peace and well being of Prospect Avenue brings at least ONE person with them - this will be a strong show of solidarity against the building. Let's not assume either rumor is true -- "its a done deal" or "no way the ZB will approve this application". Please just show up: be seen and be heard if the opportunity presents itself. If you say nothing more than "I object"/"I am against the building" that will suffice. At least we will know that we tried our best. Also remember to wear your button. Remember STRENGTH AND UNITY IN NUMBERS. 

4
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: March 15, 2010, 07:04:22 PM »
City of Hackensack Planner Review of Pineles LTACH project

5
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: February 14, 2010, 06:00:57 PM »
As the next Zoning Board Hearing meeting nears on Tuesday, February 23rd, we need to ensure increased attendance at the meeting.  Attendance at the last few meetings dwindled, which suggests that we, the community, have slackened in our opposition, are resigned and accepting of the inevitable. NOW is not the time to show defeat -- all our efforts to date for nothing. NOW is the time to show increased resistance and pressure, every word at the podium counts.  Please attend this meeting and encourage others to attend. We really need everyone's support. Please come and say NO to the LTACH.             

6
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: February 05, 2010, 12:00:34 AM »
At the January 7, 2010 hearing, Birdsall's Frank Miskovich, City of Hackensack's expert, intended to question Pineles' expert, Keller, but was unable to due to time constraints.  Basralian requested Keller have the opportunity to respond to Miskovich's questions in writing. These are Miskovich's questions:

7
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: September 23, 2009, 12:10:42 AM »
What we need is consistent support in large numbers to be both seen and heard at the Zoning Board (ZB) meetings. Of course, it would be helpful if renters take an interest in this cause, but if only EVERY homeowner conscientiously showed up at EVERY hearing - tomorrow's and future ones, we could continue to make a strong statement of objection to this project.

Remember, the idea here is that even if we were to succeed at this stage - i.e. the ZB denies the application,  (keep your fingers crossed), then Pineles will take this up at the next stage in Superior Court. Let's say, (keep your fingers crossed) he loses at this level, he then appeals to the higher court. The only thing that will be considered at that stage is the transcript from the ZB hearings.

So if it is not clear to residents yet, this is where it counts to be heard -- every recorded word in the transcript matters. So every home owner, show up at the hearing, count for something, let's not count on transitory residents - here today and gone tomorrow, and don't rely on your neighbor showing up either -- this is not the time to get complacent about this issue. If we do nothing else, putting up a fight will help extend this process a longer time and cost Pineles $$$. If nothing else, let's not let him walk all over us -- help make this process be a long drawn out one. We can buy at least 2 years more.
 
Here are some thoughts to get us through this fight:

“Winning isn't everything, but the will to win is everything” ;

“Courage is as often the outcome of despair as of hope; in the one case we have nothing to lose, in the other, everything to gain”            

SEE YOU THERE.  

8
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: September 11, 2009, 11:27:02 PM »
RENTERS, those of you who are NJT #162 bus riders -- here's good reason to attend the upcoming meetings and voice your objection to this proposed glass tower.
BEWARE --- For more than at least 10 years, NJ Transit's primary bus route from Hackensack to NY City has been the #163 bus. Many riders feel the 162 is merely the step child since, among other things, repeated requests for additional 162 buses have fallen on deaf ears.
Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if, one day soon, the 162 bus line is actually terminated. So, for those of you resident-commuters who rent, specially those of you who live between Passaic and Golf on Prospect, those of you who usually don't have to worry about standing, don't say you didn't know it would happen, because it will. It's not like the 162 will run along Passaic and Central on Summit either. You will be forced to walk a long distance to get to Summit and Central.
I see this happening:- Once construction begins, besides the construction itself that will seriously hinder buses from running smoothly on Prospect,  those renters, who have the option, are likely to move away resulting in a drop in commuter ridership, resulting in cutbacks in the number of 162 buses and being re-routed for lack of ridership. Of course, when the Bergen-Passaic LTACH is finally operational: expect even lesser ridership (possibly because LTACH employees will find it quite convenient to live in these rental buildings); expect the area to change causing less interest from potential new comers to the area; expect increased traffic which will likely lead to the 162 bus route to be terminated eventually.
So RENTERS, treat this seriously, please attend the Zoning Board hearing on September 23rd for yourself and the Prospect Avenue community, and voice your vehement objections.

Also these overcrowded 163 buses pick up large tourist groups from the Ramada in Rochelle Park. That is the reason commuters getting on at the 1st stop on Summit and Central have to stand. For those of you who do not know what its like getting on at that stop, let me tell you -- there is no line or any method to the madness there.

9
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: July 16, 2009, 11:28:31 PM »
Plea to all Hackensack area property owners, renters, and commuters:
The public turnout at prior hearings was high and filled the hall. Given that many residents are away this time of year, those of you still in town please make a concerted effort to attend the July 22nd meeting with as many people as you can gather. Let's try to avoid an empty hall that evening.

Commenting on the above posts about how Prospect Heights was approved, let's worry about the next legal level when we get there. If we relax at this level, we may not get to the next. Let's not take anything for granted. Your presence is vital at upcoming meeting.  Please attend.

10
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 24-story tower for Summit Avenue
« on: July 16, 2009, 10:05:02 PM »
This may be useful reading for some ...  

A Zoning Variance is an authorization given by the Board of Adjustment to allow an exception to certain development standards prescribed in the Zoning Code. These standards regulate setbacks, lot dimensions, lot coverage, minimum/maximum sizes and heights of structures; where buildings, yards, parking lots, driveways, signs, and lighting may be placed on properties; and other zoning code requirements.

Zoning code regulations are written in a general manner, and, in most instances, apply to all properties equally. The Code, however, provides relief from the standards in unusual circumstances.

The process used to grant relief from strict requirements of the Zoning Code is called the variance process, which includes a public hearing. In order to receive a variance, property owners must submit an application at least 3 weeks before the hearing.

Submission of an application, however, does not guarantee approval. The land owner requesting the variance must show undue hardship or practical difficulty that is not self-imposed, and must demonstrate that the variance would not harm the public welfare, not have a negative impact on the prevailing character of the immediate areas, or would not adversely impact surrounding property values. The requirement that any hardship not be self-imposed is of particular significance. The purpose of this requirement is to prevent petitions to accommodate particular habits and hobbies of the property owner.

The requirement also prevents an owner from building a non-conforming structure and then seeking a variance for that structure on the grounds that it would be a hardship to tear it down. Depending on particular circumstances, you may be ordered to move or remove that non-conforming structure.

But an "inherently beneficial use" is a land use which inherently serves the public good and promotes the general welfare, examples of those uses which have been held to be "inherently beneficial," such as schools and hospitals.

If a use is held to be inherently beneficial, it presumptively satisfies the positive criteria for the grant of a use variance under the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL), which is required when the proposed use is inconsistent with the zoning plan. 
To read the MLUL (assuming you can understand it) go to:
http://www.goleader.com/wf-masterplan/land_use_law.pdf (page 65) (40:55D-70 Powers); (page 66)(57(c) and (d)).

Pages: [1]
anything