Hackensack, NJ Community Message Boards

General Category => Hackensack Discussion => Topic started by: Editor on January 22, 2013, 11:32:02 PM

Title: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on January 22, 2013, 11:32:02 PM
Four members of Hackensack Council won't seek reelection (http://www.northjersey.com/news/Four_members_of_Hackensack_Council_wont_seek_reelection.html)
Tuesday January 22, 2013, 10:56 PM
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK — Four members of the City Council announced Tuesday night that they will not seek reelection when their terms end this spring.

Mayor Michael Melfi, Deputy Mayor Marlin Townes, Councilwoman Karen Sasso and Councilman Jorge Meneses said they will not seek new terms. Reading from a statement, Melfi said he was proud of the work the four had done on budgeting, Main Street redevelopment and recreation programs, but it was “time to pass the torch.”

“Each of us has brought different experiences and opinions to the table,” Melfi said. “Now it is time for new eyes and new ideas to build on the successes we have had.”

The four were friends when they were elected to the council as a slate in 2005.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on January 24, 2013, 11:17:50 PM
Candidates set sights on Hackensack council seats (http://www.northjersey.com/hackensack/Candidates_set_sights_on_Hackensack_council_seats.html)
Thursday, January 24, 2013    Last updated: Thursday January 24, 2013, 9:18 PM
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK – Days after four of the City Council’s five members announced they would not run for another term, a slate of candidates announced on Thursday it would seek to take over the council in the May election.

John Labrosse, the sole councilman seeking another term, is running as part of the Citizens for Change slate. A  media adviser for the group, which has been active for years, described it as a “loose confederation” of residents who want open government and “an end to insider deals.”

The ticket includes: Kathleen Canestrino, a retired aerospace engineer and a frequent critic of the city administration; a retired businessman, Leo Battaglia; David Earl Sims, a former auto industry worker who is now a paraprofessional in Hackensack school district; and a consumer protection attorney, Rose Greenman.

Labrosse said the slate is “committed to cleaning up Hackensack from the political and governmental corruption and insider deal-making that has become an embarrassment to our community.”

Labrosse, who was elected in 2009, works in the plant operations department at Hackensack University Medical Center. Both Battaglia and Canestrino have run for council in the past and lost.

On Tuesday, four council members — Mayor Michael Melfi, Karen Sasso, Marlin Townes and Jorge Meneses – announced that they will not seek reelection. They were part of a joint slate elected in 2005. The candidates said they wanted to step aside to allow new leadership and “fresh eyes.”

Their decision not to seek reelection follows a tumultuous two years in the city. Police Chief Ken Zisa was convicted of official misconduct and officers filed numerous lawsuits filed against Zisa and the city. Questions also engulfed the building department and zoning board after a fire exposed violations at a home owned by the zoning board’s attorney. Critics called for more council leadership on those issues.

Mefli, in a statement read at a council meeting Tuesday, noted the group’s achievements including progress on downtown redevelopment, new technology and recreation improvements.

Council members serve four-year terms. The non-partisan municipal election is May 14.

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on January 28, 2013, 04:06:02 PM
Labrosse heads anti-establishment ticket in Hackensack (http://www.politickernj.com/62694/labrosse-heads-anti-establishment-ticket-hackensack)
By Politicker Staff
January 28th, 2013 - 3:24pm

Hackensack Councilman John Labrosse is heading a council ticket for the May election that has pledged to clean up corruption and insider dealing that has marred Hackensack.
 
Running an anti-establishment slate in the aftermath of former Police Chief Ken Zisa's sentencing on corruption charges, the Citizens for Change Ticket vows to create more open and transparent government.”
 
“The same people have been running this town the last 20 years and they have run it as if the town belonged to them,” said Labrosse. “It’s time for a change of leadership with new people who have a new way of getting things done.” 
 
Labrosse said budgetary issues are a top priority for his team.
 
“Public money is being misspent and wasted and that must end,” said the councilman. “We will end it.”
 
Another major issue for the “Change” ticket is to get more openness and public participation in local government.
 
Kathleen Canestrino, a member of the Change ticket who previously ran for council, said: “We want to bring more openness to local government, so people know about the decisions that are being made that impact their lives. We want people to have access to public documents and we want council meetings televised. These are not difficult things to do, all it takes is the commitment from the governing body to run an open government.”
 
Leo Battaglia, a third Change ticket member, said his team will encourage more public input in local government. “We need to the public involved in government decision-making, but to do that we have to create an atmosphere where people feel comfortable expressing themselves.”
 
“There has been a culture of intimidation and hostility coming from city hall that has lasted for decades in this town. We want people to come to the city council and express their ideas and their complaints without fear,” said Battaglia.
 
Rose Greenman and  David Earl Sims,who round out the Citizens for Change ticket. said their goal as council people will be to get people involved in their own government.
 
Greenman, who lived under the repression of the former Soviet Union, said, “the  government here doesn’t belong to me, or a group of insiders; it belongs to the people and they have a right to shape their government and be part of its decisions and it’s a right that a lot of people in the world do not have.” 
 
Sims echoed the theme, saying: “The deep rooted changes that that need to be made in how Hackensack is governed need to come from the people. My runningmates and I will create an atmosphere that encourages people to bring their ideas to the council where they will be given honest consideration.”   
 
THE CITIZENS FOR CHANGE TICKET
 
John Labrosse, 58, councilman seeking re-election, resident 33 years married, with two sons; employed at Hackensack University Medical Center, in the plant operations department.
 
Kathleen Canestrino, 63. Married to Emil, bachelor’s degree in mathematics, master’s degree in computer science; a 20 year career in aerospace engineering at Honeywell Engineering, where she oversaw multimillion dollar budgets
 
Leo Battaglia, 65, Resident of Hackensack since 1978; Electrical and Electronic Degrees ; Retired Local Business Owner.  Served on Hackensack Recreation Board in 1995; Created the Hackensack Junior Soccer Program in 1986,  and has coached recreation teams and travel teams until now.  He is married, with two children and five grandchildren.
 
David Earl Sims, 50, a lifelong resident of Hackensack; a graduate of the Hackensack Public School System, where he lettered in two sports, baseball and basketball. He has a degree in Automotive Technology from Lincoln Technical Institute. David worked in the automotive industry for over 20 years.  Currently, David serves as a Para-Professional for the Hackensack Board of Education
 
Rose Greenman, 59, attorney in her own practice in Hackensack, concentrates on consumer protection, sitting on   consumer law committee of the NJ Bar Association. Lived in Hackensack since 2000, two grown boys, one is an attorney the other a teacher. Emigrated from the former Soviet Union.  Graduated Montclair State University and Seton Hall Law School.
___________

Read more at http://www.politickernj.com/62694/labrosse-heads-anti-establishment-ticket-hackensack#ixzz2JJ3tkGwk
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on February 02, 2013, 05:12:52 PM
New slate of candidates announces run for Hackensack council (http://www.northjersey.com/hackensack/New_slate_of_candidates_announces_run_for_Hackensack_council.html)
Friday February 1, 2013, 9:09 PM
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK – Five city residents have formed a slate called Hackensack Citizens for Open Government and plan to run for City Council in the May election.

All five council seats are up for grabs, and just one sitting councilman, John Labrosse, is seeking reelection. The slate members say they will run on a platform for open, transparent city government.

The slate includes Kenneth Martin, a retired city police detective who served 26 years in the department – 24 of them as a school resource officer; attorney and Board of Education member Jason Nunnermacker; Joanne Mania Colon, a city Planning Board member for 23 years and cemetery accounts manager; Joseph Barreto, a New York City school teacher and counselor; and Scott Young, an information technology specialist and special police officer.

The group also touted its record of service, which includes volunteerism with community groups, the ambulance corps, recreation leagues and business associations.

Roger Mattei, campaign manger for Citizens for Open Government, said each of the candidates is known throughout the community “as someone who can be trusted.”

It is the second slate to announce a bid to run for city council.

Last week, Citizens for Change declared its intention to run five candidates. It includes incumbent Labrosse, Kathleen Canestrino, Leo Battaglia, David Earl Sims, and Rose Greeman. As part of a local group by the same name, the candidates have railed against corruption and “insider deals” over the past few years.

Council members Michael Melfi, Karen Sasso, Marlin Townes and Jorge Meneses, all elected in 2005, said they will not seek reelection. They’ll step aside following a period of turmoil in the city that included the criminal conviction of the police chief and corruption-related lawsuits against the city.

Candidates must file nomination petitions for May’s nonpartisan election by March 11.

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Victor E Sasson on February 16, 2013, 04:23:16 PM
I will be running as an Independent in the Hackensack City Council election on May 14, 2013, if I can get at least 250 signatures on petitions to put me on the ballot. Here is the letter announcing my candidacy that was published in Friday's Hackensack Chronicle (http://www.northjersey.com/news/opinions/191347481_Letters__Hackensack__Feb__15.html?page=all). Please call me to sign a petition -- 201-488-3012.

261 Euclid Ave.,
Hackensack, N.J. 07601
Feb. 1, 2013

To the Editor:

I joke that I am running for the Hackensack City Council to get my street paved.

But the sad truth is that as property taxes have risen, the quality of life in Hackensack has declined dramatically.

My neighbor says our street hasn’t been paved in 20 years. Noise from low-flying business jets keeps me up or drowns out the TV. The city has been slow in installing solar panels, and still operates many inefficient Police Department vehicles.

I am a former reporter and copy editor at The Record. I am married and my stepson attends Hackensack High School.

If elected to a 4-year term, my goal in the first year is to halt the rise in property taxes. Then, I would work to deliver a property tax cut to residents in each of the remaining three years.

One issue the City Council hasn’t addressed in the past eight years is how much the non-profit Hackensack University Medical Center should pay to the city in lieu of taxes.

Unfortunately, council incumbent John Labrosse, who is seeking another term, works at HUMC, and likely would be ineffective in persuading the hospital to contribute more to a city that has so graciously accommodated its expansions over the years.

I am running as an Independent for Councilman-at-Large on a quality of life platform. The election will be held on May 14, 2013, and I need 250 signatures from registered voters to get on the ballot. I would be financing my campaign and would not accept money from special interests.

If elected, I will:

Work with Teterboro Airport to reduce aircraft noise, and work with federal officials to get a mandatory curfew on flights between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m.
Get Hackensack to purchase more efficient vehicles, including hybrids, for the Police Department and other agencies.
Explore government grants to add hybrids to the city’s fleet, and encourage the installation of more solar panels on city owned property.
Start collection of garbage and recyclables after 6:30 a.m.
Ban landscaping work on Saturday and Sundays
Encourage police to establish routine patrols of neighborhoods, if that isn’t being done now.
Get police to crack down on speeders, stop-sign violators and loud motorcycles.
Encourage the city to undertake a major program to repave streets, including Euclid Avenue, which hasn’t been resurfaced in about 20 years.
Have turn lanes installed on Passaic Street, at Summit Avenue, and at other traffic bottlenecks.
Encourage the City Council to deliver a property tax cut to residents by passing along some of the additional tax revenue from major building projects, and gasoline and electricity savings.
Call me with suggestions: 201-488-3012.


Save the date, May 14, 2013. Vote for peace and quiet. Vote for Victor E. Sasson for City Council.


Victor E. Sasson



Hackensack, N.J.
201-488-3012
 
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: irons35 on February 16, 2013, 06:35:17 PM
Euclid Ave was last paved in 1979, I was 10, the editor was 7.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on February 16, 2013, 06:54:46 PM
Yep. That's when I got my first skateboard.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Victor E Sasson on February 17, 2013, 02:16:43 PM
I see that the Citizens for Change slate doesn't intend to rein in property tax increases or to try to deliver a tax cut to long-suffering residents of Hackensack.

As an independent candidate for City Council in the May 14 election, my goal is to make the city work more efficiently, and to get one of the biggest non-taxpayers, Hackensack University Medical Center, to pay the city several million dollars in lieu of taxes.

The payments can be in kind -- such as helping the schools establish vegetable gardens, repaving Prospect Avenue, buying the city hybrid cars for parking enforcement and other uses. But it's clear the hospital uses too many city services and has had a tremendous impact on its neighborhood to just stand by its non-profit status in these troubled economic times.

Councilman John Labrosse, who is seeking another term, works at HUMC, and would be ineffective in this regard. What has he done in the last four years? I've attended two council meetings, and all I heard him say is, "Abstain."

Fairleigh Dickinson University also has a large presence in the city, and may also not be paying taxes. Is it doing anything to help the city's schools improve education?

Victor E. Sasson
Euclid Avenue
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on February 18, 2013, 08:53:12 AM
A tax cut without a cut in services is a pipe dream. What should be cut? If the legal fees were not so astronomical, the tax picture would be a different story. The BOE budget is separate from the City budget. So, school issues are moot for the most part.

HUMC did pay the City $1,000,000.00 when the Cancer Center was built. Not clear how administration spent that, but it certainly did not reduce taxes.

As far as an employee abstaining with regard to any vote regarding his employer, I believe that's called ethics.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on February 18, 2013, 09:05:04 AM
One more thing, paving is a complicated issue. In order to pay for it, without increasing taxes, there is a formula for use of funding - grants I believe. I have attended almost every meeting, including work sessions, for the past few years and I learned this when paving Kaplan, Parker, Simons, etc. was discussed. It took a long time to get the funding together for this project. This project was done with "leftover" money. These roads were in really rough shape and were patched so many times they could have been repaved twice. Many roads in Hackensack, including yours, are in bad shape. If you check with the City you can find out where your project might be on the list, or if it is on the list at all.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Victor E Sasson on February 20, 2013, 11:00:27 AM
There's ethics and there's another factor at work on whether John Labrosse will step up and ask HUMC, his employer, to give back to Hackensack, and again, it doesn't necessarily have to be money. Among other things, it could be the paving of Prospect Avenue and starting vegetable gardens at the schools, where the food is inedible, according to my stepson. Like most employers, including The Record, HUMC isn't a democracy, and Labrosse will be bounced out if he dares suggest that the sprawling hospital pay anything in lieu of taxes.

See Eye on The Record for my account of Tuesday night's City Council meeting, which wasn't covered by The Record:

http://eyeontherecord.blogspot.com/2013/02/what-hackensack-reportrer-missed-last.html
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on February 21, 2013, 08:44:16 PM
What is the other factor at work? I am missing your point. Besides, Prospect has been paved in the area of the hospital and school lunch is up to the BOE. So your examples do not make sense to me. And why are you going after the man's job? Do you expect free Carvel from Sasso, or Townes to ask the County to pony up for the City? You are way off base, but if that makes you feel better, go for it. The hospital provides much to the City. I do not know many people that are happy with all the real estate they have taken up, but you really should check your facts and see for yourself what the hospital gives back already.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Victor E Sasson on February 22, 2013, 10:35:49 AM
Regina, are you the same shrill woman who gets up at council meetings and screams and yells about astronomical legal bills? I'm talking about thinking outside the box. The hospital has had a huge impact on Hackensack and most of its patients come from out of town. It's time for it to give back, period. Money, vegetable gardens at the schools, you name it, it should be on the table. It doesn't have to be Prosepct Avenue near the hospital, it could be any street in Hackensack. Whose side are you on? Certainly not the taxpayers.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on February 22, 2013, 01:19:48 PM
Mr Sasson, against my better judgment I am responding to you. Go ahead, make me regret it. You are good at that.

Do the taxpayers not pay the astronomical legal bills? If I am not asking about legal bills for the taxpayers' sake, then whose side do you think I am on? If you do not appreciate it, that's your problem.

Define shrill ... is it because I do not meekly ask a question and walk away like you do? I know what I am talking about when I speak at council meetings. You have only attended the past few meetings. I have been attending for years! Where have you been? Anybody that is not outraged by the legal bills has their priorities out of whack and their head in the vegetable patch.

One more thing, aren't you the same person who has a vile and nasty blog solely because you have an ax to grind with The Record, your former employer?
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on February 22, 2013, 09:57:29 PM
As for as HUMC is concerned, the current and past administrations have been lame in dealing with them on all these issues.  HUMC contributes at least half of the volume of traffic within a few block radius.  At the very least, they should be paying to install traffic lights at Prospect and Atlantic, and at Prospect and Beech.  Both are LONG overdue.  A few residents suggested this at the Cancer Center zoning application, but there was no official support.

What happened behind the scenes negotiating between HUMC and the Zisa Administration, with regard to where the hospital overlay zone would be and where future expansion would be heading. This happened in conjunction with the city's Master Plan as well as during talks over various expansion projects.  I don't think there is anything in writing, no Resolution, no formal agreement.  Just a meeting of minds. The city clearly wanted HUMC to keep it's hands off Summit Ave, which is where they and their affiliates had wanted to build, and to instead expand down towards the Railroad. Zoning changes and Master Plan changes were made towards that end. That appeared to be the main goal, and things like paving roads or traffic lights were not part of the unofficial agreement.  Nothing is to be built in the Summit Ave overlay zone (Essex to Beech) except small office buildings that look just like houses.

I think in retrospect, the city should have encouraged HUMC to develop in the downtown district, or even at the 30-acre Record Campus, but who knew they'd be leaving.

The Zisa administration was heavily concerned with the zoning and planning for Summit Ave since they took office, and actually even before that. Zoning on Summit Ave has been a defining issue, from the Borg and Brower properties, to the Bergen-Passaic LATCH, to the removal of the R1 zone in 2005 in favor of the R75 and R100. And lets not forget the Mosque proposal at Summit & Central.  People who favored big development on Summit Ave, such as Suzanne Sznajermann, a Planning Board member appointed by former Mayor Fred Cerbo, were immediately removed (not reappointed) from the Planning Board as soon as Jack Zisa became mayor.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Victor E Sasson on February 23, 2013, 08:46:39 AM
Just Watching makes some excellent points.

As for Regina, the last thing we need is someone like you who defends the status quo when it comes to Hackensack University Medical Center.

You have been rightly bitching and moaning about astronomical legal bills, but has Councilman John Labrosse -- whom you support and who is running for another term -- ever tried to cut the hourly rate paid to Richard Malagiere, Joe Zisa, Dennis Calo and other attorneys, or moved to end the city's relationship with Zisa now that his cousin has made his disgraceful exit from the Police Department and city affairs?

As for my Eye on The Record blog, 99 percent of it concerns the piss-poor journalism it is practicing, its lazy local-news editors, the abysmal lack of Hackensack news and the impact North Jersey Media Group had on Main Street when it fled for the sticks.

My age-discrimination suit against the newspaper is history, and it is no longer even mentioned in the bio on the blog.

And at least I don't hide behind a single name or an "Anonymous" tag. You should identify yourself by your full name and tell us who you support -- so we can put your comments in perspective.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on February 23, 2013, 09:03:49 AM
Yes, Regina is a LaBrosse supporter and part of the Citizens for Change team for a long time.  And she typically posts on this website around election time, and then disappears for years. 

What needs to be done in America is COMMUNITY BUILDING, not POLITICKING.  Be involved in the community, and work for the good of the community just for the sake of the community. That is what people respect.  Instead we have tons of people in Hackensack (on both sides of the politics, by the way), who have the "politics first" perspective.  This means that the priority is to "throw the bums out, and put in our people", and then change can advance.

I have always believed that advancing particular initiatives should never be delayed because someone else is in power and could potentially take credit. Instead I always believed that the community initiatives were the priority, and "candidates" for office would define themselves by whether or not they supported the initiative. Never, never let the "candidates" control the show, meaning to decide which community initiatives would advance and WHEN they would advance (meaning, to advance only AFTER they take office).
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on February 23, 2013, 09:19:45 AM
If you went to more than a couple of council meetings over the past few years you would know the answers to your questions. I have no desire to fill you in on what you've missed except that you would know that legal fee hourly rate was increased from $85 to $125 in 2005, before Mr Labrosse was elected. One council member cannot unilaterally change anything. That's why we need people who want change.

Nice of you to say I was right to complain about legal fees. If more people had complained over the past few years, we might not be saddled with these enormous bills. Nobody but a few die-hards has cared to come to council meetings on a regular basis to let administration know it is unacceptable. So they do what they want, not what the residents want. They know they can. As mayor Melfi said to me when I asked for televised meetings, "Your are only one of 44,000". He then corrected it to 3 of us, because that's how many people regularly attend council meetings. Pathetic on many levels.

As far as your request that I reveal my identity, more ridiculousness. You know who I am, as do most people, and you know who I support. Why single me out in that request? Oh, because I do not agree with you. Ask more of your foes than your friends?
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on February 23, 2013, 09:28:10 AM
Just watching, I have not disappeared. Been right here, just watching the posts, attending council meetings, keeping up to date with what is going on in the city. Mr Sasson is running for council, promoting himself and his blog on this site and suddenly attending council meetings. That's OK with you, but what I post is not? Who is being politica? If you lived in Hackensack you could vote for him, but you do not.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on February 23, 2013, 09:38:41 AM
I agree that the whole legal fee issue is an outrage.  And I am not a supporter of Ken Zisa either.  I was one of the first people against him, way back in the mid-1990's. I always thought his political career (Assemblyman, candidate for Sheriff, and Democrat Party strongman) was a conflict of interest with being the Police Chief. So even if he had done nothing wrong, I didn't like the combination of hats he was wearing.  Just too much concentration of power in the hands of one person.  Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. 

I suspect that the Melfi administration would have lost if they ran again because of the Chief Zisa conviction, and all the other lawsuits in the police department.  It was time to step aside, and they did the right thing for Hackensack. The President only serves two terms, so it's not a stretch to say two terms is enough for a city council. If they had run again, the five elected seats would have shifted to Citizens for Change, and that is still a possibility. That would be an even bigger disaster.  Complainers are good at complaining, not at running the city.

How the Melfi-Townes, etc. administration handled the city's police troubles is 100% a non-issue in this election.  They are not running.

Actually neither ticket is tainted. Although I don't support him, it is clear that LaBrosse is not tainted because everyone knows he's been the opposition councilman, especially with regard to the Chief.  The other folks, Citizens for Open Government, are five new people.  They are five people who care about Hackensack and want to help lead the city in the right direction. It's not fair to say they are tainted by the scandal.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on February 23, 2013, 09:46:34 AM
Just watching, better go check your facts on Open Government. They may not be "tainted", but it is very easy to connect the dots, especially since Mr Salkin escorted them to the council meeting this week. Please, let us know what you find. Hint, Planning Board, BOE and HPD are good places to start.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Victor E Sasson on February 23, 2013, 11:00:43 AM
The Citizens for Open Government slate is supported wholeheartedly by Lynne Hurwitz, the Democratic Party chairwoman who was the power behind Ken Zisa and the Zisa slate that now holds four of the five council seats. Does anyone need another reason to boycott their candidacy and vote for someone else? Let's see how "open" the slate members are -- if they get on the ballot -- on who supports and finances their campaign.

As for Regina's boast, attending council meetings doesn't mean jack.

Councilman John Labrosse may be the only opposition on the council, but why does he sit silently all the time and let his wife attack the council majority? And why exactly did she sue the council?
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on February 23, 2013, 11:05:35 AM
Politics in Hackensack is a coalition of interests.  There are very different interest groups in Hackensack that vie for attention and to share power. These are (1) geographic, meaning different neighborhoods (2) ethnic or racial (3) interest-based, for instance Baseball of Hackensack, PTA folks, or a group based on Zoning dispute like the 19-story hospital proposed for Summit Ave, (4) political parties and even FACTIONS within political parties, and (5) sometimes a large and entrenched political family like the D'Arminio's, the Zisa's, and others.  An example of factions that would be your blue-color white ethnic Democrats and your liberal Jewish anti-war, pro separation of church and state Democrats, who are both Democrats but very different politically.  We all know people in Hackensack that fits those descriptions.

The point I'm making is that a political organization is not a unified organization, but rather a collection of various interests (see 1 - 5 above) that have agreed to work together for the common interest in running the City of Hackensack. There is no single person in power behind the scenes, and the players are constantly changing and evolving.  There is an expectation of loyalty, but also an unwritten understanding that if individual people in power drift out of line, the "organization" might evolve in a different direction.

These concepts illustrate how you get Roger Mattei and Lynne Hurwitz on the same side, for example.  They are very different politically. So to "connect the dots" as Regina suggests means only to define the intricate political web-network or various and sometimes conflicting interests. 44,000 people is still a small place, politically. The dots are going to connect everywhere.

But they don't connect with Citizens for Change because the organization is not based on people working together to advance various issues, it's based on complaining and protesting. [Personal attack removed by Editor]. And it's people out of power wanting power, and wanting to control the strings of patronage.


Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on February 23, 2013, 11:45:28 AM
Just watching, Citizens for Change meets all your criteria (1-5). Having Lynne Hurwitz involved in any way negates all that criteria, because, as history has shown, it is her show. Mattei as campaign manager seems to be in name only. He was a councilman under Jack Zisa (dot connected). Salkin is deeply involved and deeply connected to certain factions (Zisa/Hurwitz  especially-dot connected). Why did he escort the slate to the council meeting and not Mattei?

I just connected a couple of dots for you. Hackensack may be 6 degrees of separation, but does Citizens for Change have any of the prior administrations (who created much of the problems) connected so closely?

Salkin was involved in the cancer center/parking garage deal. Mr Labrosse wanted that taxed as it is a business. Instead we are getting paid for "air rights" for the pedestrian bridge for however many years. There is more on the cancer center if you are interested, but I do not want to be accused of "complaining" if I share.

Those who have not spoken out and tried to change the status quo have sat by and accepted it. Anyone who classifies those who speak out as "complainers" just verifies that they have accepted the status quo.

I do not believe I boasted that I attend council meetings. I stated the fact that I do and I do so because I want to find out firsthand what is going on, not someone's slant on it.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on February 23, 2013, 02:11:48 PM
"LaBrosse wanted that (Cancer center/parking garage) taxed as a business."

Don't we all ?  It's great to ask for things that are not possible. There is State law that dictates what can and cannot be classified as a tax ratable.  Unfortunately hospitals fall in the same category as County administrative buildings.  They cannot be taxed. 

I would suggest that Citizens for Change lobby their State legislators and Governor Christie to change some of these laws.

I would love to see the County contribute tax revenue for their properties, churches, non-profits, and hospitals, and then the County could tax everyone County-wide to cover the cost.  That way the tax burden would be spread out over all the towns of Bergen County.  But of course the wealthy towns that don't have so many of these facilities control the politics, and they don't want that.  And I can't take credit for this idea, something like it was first suggested by Jack Zisa, so I have to be fair.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on February 23, 2013, 02:17:35 PM
I removed a sentence by just watching in a post above that I considered to be a personal attack and possibly defamatory in violation of the registration agreement.

This is a place to discuss the issues.  It is not a place to label people, make accusations, question motivations, or attack people for their political affiliations. 

Keep it clean. There are school-aged kids reading these topics.  Let's set an example.

Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on February 23, 2013, 02:26:44 PM
Thank you, Editor.

The parking garage most certainly could have been put on the tax rolls, but the attorney representing the City (Salkin) gave it away. The cancer center is not technically a hospital, mostly doctors' offices. Could have partially taxed at the very least, but again it was given away.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Homer Jones on February 23, 2013, 02:28:22 PM
Hate to break the news but that idea has been floating around in every County Seat for as long as the governmental and non profit tax exemption laws have been in effect which has been quite a long time.
With all their political muscle, Newark and Jersey City got nowhere with that idea.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on February 23, 2013, 02:34:51 PM
The sentence deleted was not a personal attack.  It was venturing into a subject matter that was controversial and involved the former Chief of Police.  Given all the litigation, I can understand the Editor's concern.  Noted.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on March 05, 2013, 02:55:17 PM
Please use this topic for election news and discussion of campaingn issues.  Candidates and campaigners should post in the Community Soapbox (http://www.hackensacknow.org/index.php/board,19.0.html) board for campaign positions, announcements, etc.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on March 07, 2013, 12:34:42 AM
For anyone counting, I've posted 5 election news articles including the one below: 2 for each main ticket and 1 about the four incumbents not running again.

In the interests of fairness and to promote greater awareness of the candidates, I am including a link to the Citizens for Change website (http://hackensackcitizensforchange.blogspot.com/).

_____________________________
Hackensack Coalition for Open Government Files Candidacy  (http://www.cntyseat.com/hackensack-coalition-for-open-government-files-candidacy/)
County Seat
March 7, 2013

(http://www.cntyseat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/sigs2-300x169.jpg)
Photo Courtesy: Hackensack Coalition for Open Government Jason Nunnermacker, Kenneth Martin, Joanne Mania Colon, Joseph Barreto and Scott Young.
 
Kenneth Martin, Jason Nunnermacker, Joanne Mania Colon, Joseph Barreto and Scott Young have more than 400 signed petitions declaring their bid for Hackensack City Council. On March 1, the five members of the Hackensack Coalition for Open Government gathered at City Hall as a united team to formalize their intention to run in the May 14 election.
 
“We are dedicated to improving the quality of life for the citizens of Hackensack,” said Martin, a retired Hackensack police officer. “In addition to implementing our own plans for the improvement of our community we look forward to meeting with our residents to learn what it is on their list of concerns as well.”
 
The team has pledged transparency in city government. They took the opportunity to unveil their 10-point plan for open government.
 
• Formally adopt the Local Open Government Principles.
• Establish a local ethics board to monitor and review actions of city officials and employees in regard to conflicts of interest and other ethical violations.
• Establish a Citizen Complaint Review Board to offer residents an alternate route in reporting unsatisfactory dealings with city departments.
• Establish a Civil Litigation Review Board to assess the validity of claims against the city and review the related city policies and procedures.
• Publish proposed ordinances on our city Web site along with the opportunity for online public comment.
• Create a process on our city Website, www.Hackensack.org to allow for online petitions concerning local issues of interest and concern.
• Require representatives of city departments to attend public council meetings to report on activities and answer questions from residents.
• Issue monthly reports to residents describing the significant issues and activities for that month.
• Televise city council meetings.
• Re-establish and promote City Hall office hours so that residents can seek the help and services of their city council.
 
“We plan to announce our team’s position on the other very significant issues and challenges facing our community as this campaign progresses,” said Campaign Manager Roger Mattei.
 
Another slate, Hackensack Citizens for Change, comprised of John Labrosse, Kathy Canestrino, David Sims, Rose Greenman and Leonardo Battaglia, filed on Feb. 28.
______________________

Related Topic: Civilian Complaint Review Board (http://www.hackensacknow.org/index.php/topic,526.0.html) (though I think the focus here was the Police Dept., not all city departments).
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Weegee on March 07, 2013, 10:43:14 AM
Just curious.  Has the "other" slate of 5 candidates been featured in this "community" newspaper previous to this issue? 
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Victor E Sasson on March 07, 2013, 04:48:55 PM
It remains to be seen how open the Hackensack Coalition for Open Government will be concerning the candidates' main supporter, Lynne Hurwitz, the Democratic Party chairwoman who was the power behind Ken Zisa, the disgraced former police chief and assemblyman.

And although the editor has reprinted articles from The Record on the two slates long before they filed, he or she has not written anything about my candidacy.

The Record will not publish a story about my candidacy because I am not part of an organized slate, Staff Writer Hannan Adely explained. Calls to Steven McCarthy, her assignment editor, were not returned.

I am confident I will be able to get enough signatures by the March 11 deadline to get on the ballot. As a reminder, I will be at the Dunkin' Donuts on Passaic Street from 10 a.m. to noon on Saturday to meet voters.

Cheers,
Victor E. Sasson
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on March 07, 2013, 06:43:09 PM
I do not write news stories.  Your candidacy/platform announcement appears in this topic thread as well as your replies. If and when there is a news article about you, you will find it here.

You have also used this site to campaign almost daily since you joined. I think this site has afforded you plenty of exposure.

You're welcome.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on March 08, 2013, 06:35:26 AM
vsasson has alleged that Lynne Hurwitz was the power behind Ken Zisa.  Anyone who has a political recollection going back to the 1980's or earlier will laugh at that one.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on March 08, 2013, 12:08:02 PM
They were/are best buds. Didn't you see the photos of Lynne at the trial? I believe she was there everyday.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Homer Jones on March 08, 2013, 02:01:38 PM
You are 100% on that one Regina.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Victor E Sasson on March 08, 2013, 03:58:06 PM
I don't care much for Mike Kelly of The Record, but he wrote a column about Lynne Hurwitz in June 2012:

"She is a 73-year-old grandmother who says her “style is to help people.” Her critics call her a fierce, no-holds-barred power broker and key strategist behind Hackensack’s former police chief, Ken Zisa, and his family’s political machine.

So who is Lynne Hurwitz, really?"

Here is a link to the column, and just know that Hurwitz's support for the Open Government slate in the May election is common knowledge around City Hall:

http://www.northjersey.com/columnists/kelly/Kelly_A_reformers_conversion_to_hardball_politics.html

Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on March 09, 2013, 08:51:52 AM
I don't care what some columnist has to say about Lynne Hurwitz.  I know the type of Democrat Lynne Hurwitz is.  And what type of Democrat Ken Zisa is.  And I know that Hurwitz was politically aligned against the Zisa's in every city election from the 1960's up to 1985.  They came to support each other out of necessity, sort of like factions agreeing to share power.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on March 09, 2013, 10:43:14 AM
So you think maybe she sat front and center at his trial to gloat? You are out of touch with the current political climate in Hackensack. Hurwitz was there to support Zisa. Hurwitz supports Citizens for Open Government. Do you think otherwise? Of course she is involved. Connect the dots again.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on March 09, 2013, 11:23:12 AM
As I said "They came to support each other out of necessity, sort of like factions agreeing to share power".  That is an acknowledgement that she supported Ken Zisa politically.  I'll put the timetable on her support of Ken Zisa as 1988 and onwards. 

What's in her heart, that's another story. In my opinion, she wants what is best for Hackensack, and she was and has been willing to make sacrificing and political alliances to be in the position to advance the best possible agenda for Hackensack.  In the minds of Loretta Weinberg and other "true" Democrats who used to be her closest friends, they say that Hurwitz "sold out."  I disagree, she was given a bunch of lemons to work with.   When you are given lemons, you make lemonaide.  Hurwitz has a view of Hackensack that spans generations, she doesn't think in years or even elections, but in generations.

History will be kind to Lynne Hurwitz, in the end.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on March 09, 2013, 12:45:41 PM
History will be kind to Lynne Hurwitz, in the end.

Don't count on it. How did she earn the nickname "Dragon Lady"?

Power, absolute power, that's the tie that binds those two. And you know the saying about absolute power ...
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on March 17, 2013, 11:53:44 AM
Candidates are set to face off in Hackensack council race (http://www.northjersey.com/news/198648841_Candidates_are_set_to_face_off_in_Hackensack_council_race.html?page=all)
Sunday, March 17, 2013   
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK — As the city emerges from a turbulent period that has seen endless litigation, the criminal conviction of a police chief and continued warring between the city administration and its critics, two opposing candidate slates and a single independent contender are facing off in the May election at a crucial point for municipal government.

All five City Council seats are at stake, and only one incumbent is seeking a new term, making it certain that new faces will populate the city’s powerful governing body on July 1 when the council is sworn in.

Five candidates are running on the Hackensack Citizens for Change line, with a pledge to end corruption, cronyism and intimidation. Another five are running under the Hackensack Coalition for Open Government banner, promising to improve residents’ quality of life and increase transparency. Victor Sasson, the only candidate running solo in May’s election, said he is seeking public office to limit noise, step up traffic enforcement and boost tax revenue.

The candidates will have to convince weary voters that they can be trusted as the city continues with an ambitious plan to redevelop the downtown, which is already seeing traction with a proposed 222-unit apartment building on State Street. Some voters say new council members also should not have ties to the Zisa family political machine that has dominated through a time of turmoil.

In the past few years, the city has been hit by numerous lawsuits filed by police officers over alleged abuses by former Chief Ken Zisa, who was convicted of official misconduct and insurance fraud last year. Several officers have also faced charges, including three who pleaded guilty on Monday to their roles in a 2011 assault.

The Building Department came under fire for its handling of violations at a property owned by the zoning board attorney, while the head of that department fights a sexual harassment lawsuit.

"The tax burden caused by corrupt, crony government is enormous on our taxpayers," said Kathleen Canestrino, a Hackensack Citizens for Change candidate who has criticized the city’s legal spending.

Aside from Canestrino, the slate includes Leonardo Battaglia, Rose Greenman, David Sims and the incumbent John Labrosse.

"We are a team of hardworking, ordinary citizens, with one extraordinary goal: to clean up Hackensack’s corrupt and abusive city government and return it to the citizens and taxpayers," said Labrosse, who was elected to the council four years ago.

Team members want to make city records and meeting agendas available to the public and televise meetings. They also want to establish commissions to investigate ethics complaints and oversee redevelopment decisions.

Slates square off

The candidates accuse the Coalition for Open Government slate — which includes Joseph Barreto, Joanne Mania Colon, Kenneth Martin, Jason Nunnermacker and Scott Young — of having ties to the same Democratic Party power brokers who have exerted influence in the city for years.

The team’s manager, former Councilman Roger Mattei, responded: "There’s no secret agenda to try and bring back any political forces that were present in the city at any given time. What you have are sincere people looking to elect qualified committed candidates to best serve Hackensack."

Mattei said he, the Board of Education attorney Richard Salkin, and zoning board member George Diana worked together to assemble the slate with input from community and business leaders.

The candidates say they will make it easier for citizens to get information with improvements to the city’s website and televised meetings and that they will establish civilian review boards. The group also touted its record of service, which includes volunteerism with community groups, the ambulance corps, recreation leagues and business associations.

"We are dedicated to improving the quality of life for the citizens of Hackensack," said Martin, a retired Hackensack police officer.

Sasson, under the banner "A Vote for Peace and Quiet," has pledged to work to reduce aircraft noise from Teterboro Airport, ban landscaping work on Sundays and encourage police to crack down on loud motorcycles and stop-sign violators. He also has called for a street repaving program and for the city to use more energy-efficient vehicles and solar panels.

"At the street level, people want their streets paved. They want to crack down on speeding cars and stop-sign violators," Sasson said. "They want changes that will affect them personally."

Sasson, a former reporter and copy editor with The Record, also called for more payments in lieu of taxes from Hackensack University Medical Center, which he said has an "enormous amount of tax-exempt property."

Residents’ concerns

In street interviews, Hackensack residents said their top issues varied from lowering taxes, to helping the homeless, to ending racial profiling by police.

"I care about the homeless and the quality of the shelters," said Angela St. Claire, 50, adding that shelters were often "overloaded."

Duanne Cobbs, 38, who is unemployed and trying to find work, said he wanted more economic improvements and job opportunities.

Sue Carroll, 54, a learning consultant, called for road repairs and more activities for seniors and handicapped residents. Carroll said she believes the city is moving past its problems with corruption. Mostly, she said, she wants people in office who know their community.

"I’d like to have people as candidates who are Hackensack residents for a long time and who know the issues," she said.

The election is May 14.

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Etaylor on April 10, 2013, 07:21:02 AM
I see Mr. Sasson is in this story. Guess what he said about The Record ignoring his candidacy was wrong.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on April 13, 2013, 05:52:04 PM
Hackensack judge to review complaint on city councilman stealing opponents campaign signs

SATURDAY APRIL 13, 2013, 5:12 PM
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD
PRINT | E-MAIL

HACKENSACK – A city judge will review a complaint Monday that was filed against a council candidate accused of stealing his opponents’ campaign signs.

City police say surveillance videotape shows Kenneth Martin removing four signs that had been located outside the Hackensack Market, at 120 Passaic St. Martin, a retired Hackensack police detective, is running on the Coalition for Open Government line.

On the video, he is spotted removing the signs for the Citizens for Change team and placing them in his trunk. Council candidate Leo Battaglia filed a complaint Friday accusing Martin of theft of movable property, said Hackensack Police Director Michael Mordaga.

“There are video cameras on the building,” Mordaga said. “The video does confirm that Mr. Martin removed those signs from private property.”

Martin declined to comment on the matter Saturday when reached by phone. He said Battaglia was using the allegation “to distract residents from what I’m trying to do in the city.”

Battaglia said the theft showed a lack of integrity. “We don’t touch any of his signs,” he said. “This is stealing. He should be an example for the community.”

Hackensack Market manager Bhavesh Patel said the individuals who put up the signs asked his permission, but that Martin didn’t ask his permission to remove them. He said it was possible that another manager spoke to Martin, but he was not sure.

Councilman John Labrosse, who is running for reelection with Citizens for Change, said his team was concerned because a few dozen signs have gone missing. “You work hard to get them out there and put them up and all of a sudden they’re gone,” he said.

Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on April 13, 2013, 06:07:18 PM
Headline should read candidate, not councilman. Another error in Record article. Thought I'd point that out before Mr Sasson did
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on April 14, 2013, 08:56:03 AM
That stuff has been going on for all the years I've followed Hackensack elections. Every slate in every election has been victimized by disappearing signs.   Unfortunately it's a Hackensack tradition; it's all part of the game. For every person nailed for that, there's another 25 who've gotten away with it.  Glad some publicity has been given to this. Maybe with so many people owning surveillance cameras, even on houses, that'll make everyone honest.

What I'm more interested in is the signs disappearing after Election Day, and not cluttering up lawns and telephone poles.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on April 14, 2013, 04:51:19 PM
The stickers are the worst.  I still see stickers for Sheriff Terhune around town.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: tuscany on April 15, 2013, 11:25:40 PM
In keeping with tradition of displaying, or otherwise linking to, articles reference to the 2013 council race in this thread:

http://hackensackscoop.blogspot.com/2013/04/update-candidate-for-council-suspected.html
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on April 16, 2013, 10:20:57 AM
This is in response to swapcaster's post on the LTACH board. I thought it was better that I post this here.

HACKENSACK CITIZENS FOR CHANGE INVITE YOU TO THEIR MEET AND GREET:

It is your vote, It is your future. Be informed. Be the Change.
Come to a MEET AND GREET hosted by
the HACKENSACK CITIZENS FOR CHANGE CANDIDATES
April 26....7PM
HACKENSACK ELKS (Linden Street)
For more information email Debbie Labrosse @ teledebbie0627@verizon.net


Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on April 17, 2013, 10:20:32 AM
I did not post before because I thought Open Government might

MEET THE CANDIDATES - Q & A

Friday, April 19 at St Anthony's Church, Lodi Street - basement

7:00 Open Government
8:00 Citizens for Change
9:00 Victor E. Sasson

THIS IS A CORRECTION OF PRIOR POSTING - EVENT IS AT ST ANTHONY'S
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on April 25, 2013, 05:56:22 PM
Hackensack candidate to go to trial on charge he stole campaign signs (http://www.northjersey.com/hackensack/Hackensack_candidate_to_go_to_trial_on_charge_he_stole_campaign_signs.html)
Thursday April 25, 2013, 4:45 PM
BY  KIBRET MARKOS
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK – A city council candidate accused of stealing his opponent’s campaign signs this month will go to trial in June on a theft complaint, a judge ruled Thursday.

Kenneth Martin, a retired police detective, was accused by his opponent, Leo Battaglia, of removing Battaglia’s campaign signs from the front of a supermarket on West Passaic Street.

City police later said the store’s surveillance video showed that Martin pulled into the parking lot, removed the signs and placed them in his trunk.

Battaglia filed a complaint with the city police. After a hearing in a Hackensack courtroom on Thursday, Judge Roy F. McGeady, the Bergen County presiding municipal judge, found “probable cause,” meaning there was sufficient evidence for the case to proceed to trial.

“Justice will prevail,” Battaglia said later on Thursday. “He [Martin] is running under the banner of open government, and then he goes out and does something like this.”

Martin is running for council in the May 14 election on the Coalition for Open Government line. He is accused of removing signs for the Citizens for Change team.

Martin did not return two phone calls Thursday, but has earlier characterized the accusations as a distraction employed by his opponent.

Martin is accused of theft by taking four signs worth a total of $24 – a disorderly persons offense. The maximum penalty for the offense is six months in jail and $1,000 fine, although it is extremely rare for judges to send defendants to jail for disorderly-persons convictions.

Email: markos@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 04, 2013, 05:59:51 PM
Teacher information used in council letter-writing campaign (http://www.northjersey.com/news/206069311_Teacher_information_used_in_council_letter-writing_campaign_used_school_listings_for_mailing.html?page=all)
Saturday, May 4, 2013
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record
 
HACKENSACK — The Coalition for Open Government, a slate of candidates seeking election to the City Council, used a school district directory to identify and send campaign letters to teachers in apparent violation of district policy.

Some teachers and support staff received letters at their homes asking them as educators to vote for the slate of five candidates running in the May 14 election. Roger Mattei, the campaign manager, said he did not believe the directory was a restricted document, but the district's top official disagreed.

"The bottom line, from my point of view, is that a staff directory is confidential," said Joseph Abate, the interim superintendent.

The letter, typed on campaign letterhead, asks the recipient "as a person who has chosen a career as an educator in the Hackensack School System" and is "dedicated to this community" to support five candidates: Kenneth Martin, Jason Nunnermacker, Joanne Mania Colon, Joseph Barreto and Scott Young.

Mattei said the directories are circulated among staff and PTA groups and were "around and all over the place." Two or three teachers, he said, brought the directory to campaign headquarters.

"The directory is not a private piece of material," he said. "You're not going to classify a school directory in the same way you classify health records."

The teachers were targeted for letters just like other groups, including tenant organizations or business people, he said.

Abate said the district doesn't allow campaigning and politicking on school premises and that the use of school records was also off limits.

"As far as personnel goes — starting date, ending date and salary [are public]," Abate said. "Anything beyond that the public does not have a right to know."

One of the letters went to teacher Debbie Labrosse, whose husband John Labrosse, a councilman, is seeking reelection as part of the opposing Hackensack Citizens for Change ticket. All five seats on the council are up for grabs in the election and 11 people are running.

Labrosse said she was offended that teacher information had been used for political mailings. "It's wrong for anybody to give that information out without getting the OK from people whose names are in there," she said.

She said Open Government slate "feels the rules are for everyone else and not for them," pointing to recent allegations that Martin stole opponents' campaigns signs — a matter that will be heard in court next month.

Mattei said the Citizens for Change slate was using a negative and divisive campaign to try to win.

Abate said the district has not received a formal complaint about the use of the staff directory.

After hearing that the opposing slates used a staff list, a representative from the Citizens for Change ticket went to district offices Wednesday and asked for a copy of the list. Abate said he denied the request.

"We have a clear policy, no campaigning and no politics on school premises," he said. "If proven, it's a violation of our policy and we'll handle it on a case-to-case basis."

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 05, 2013, 10:39:10 PM
This was posted in the 24-story tower for Summit Avenue (http://www.hackensacknow.org/index.php/topic,987.msg8587.html#msg8587) thread by "07601bergen". I'm duplicating it here, should anyone want to reply.  Please consider whether your reply belongs here or in the other topic.
 
____________________________________________

As a concerned member of Prospect Avenue Coalition, I was invited to and attended some of the “Meet the Candidates” events, sponsored by many Prospect Avenue hi-rises, where the candidates seeking election to the City Council presented their positions on a number of critical issues.

I also attended a followup residents’ discussion group last week. Many who attended indicated that they wanted to decide on which candidates to vote for and were looking for subtle insights from other attendees which they could consider in reaching their voting choices. The future of the LTACH litigation was overwhelmingly the group's primary concern. For this monumentally important reason, all present thought that we could best demonstrate our positions and strength by voting for a unified selection of candidates.

We felt that a mixed slate, rather than a single slate, fit the bill to achieve the overall group's ideal view of all that needs to be achieved. A mixed slate offers a combination of skills, ability, concern, understanding and personality which is best suited to tackle Hackensack’s upcoming and midterm issues regarding LTACH and other issues.

It would behoove those whose predominant concern is the LTACH to truly understand which candidates will tirelessly fight the LTACH fight till LTACH is out of options, and feel comfortable with how these candidates plan to keep money allocated to this budget item to its conclusion. If the incoming slate is solely concerned with high litigation costs and cutting budgets, this slate may just decide that the LTACH litigation cost is excessive and does not merit any further City involvement. THIS MEANS THAT THE COST OF LTACH LITIGATION WILL FALL ON PROSPECT AVENUE OWNER/RESIDENTS. It has been suggested that unless we have a HALF-MILLION $$ to spend we might as well save the pittance in hand and brace ourselves now. Sell your property for what you can get now. Surely, our property values will plummet when the LTACH is built.  
Members of the Prospect Avenue Coalition have reviewed the candidates’ websites and mailings.  After much introspection and thought, digging deeper than most, each of us present has a strong opinion as to which candidates may best serve our needs. The option detailed below is one you may wish to consider:

#1 John LaBrosse
#3 David Sims
#7 Jason Nunnermacker
#9 Joseph Barreto
#10 Scott Young

In closing, Anthony Palmieri (Excelsior III and PC Air rights litigation) just purchased land at 593 Summit Avenue, and just may be waiting to see what happens with the LTACH appeal.   

Hackensack residents NEED TO VOTE. EVERY VOTE COUNTS.  PLEASE TELL YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS. This will send a clear message to current or future developers, that we will protect the zoning rights that have been established to make Prospect & Summit Avenues and surrounding areas the wonderful residential communities they have become.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: itsmetoo on May 05, 2013, 11:22:16 PM
I just find it interesting that not one female candidate was chosen.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 05, 2013, 11:26:30 PM
I noticed the lack of representation by a female candidate also. How does the rest of Hackensack feel about this?

I wrote the following reply on the original post:
Are Prospect Avenue residents aware that there are other issues in this election? NOBODY wants the LTACH. The Prospect Avenue group has hired their own attorney to represent their interests and I believe the motion to intervene has been granted. Any good zoning attorney could step in and get up to speed in a heartbeat. Right now Joe Zisa is making preparations (at taxpayer expense) for a smooth transition on this issue.

I'd like to know if your suggested candidates were by consensus, or if this is your own opinion. I ask this because you wrote:

"After much introspection and thought, digging deeper than most, each of us present has a strong opinion as to which candidates may best serve our needs. The option detailed below is one you may wish to consider"

It is not clear to me who is endorsing these candidates, or why.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on May 06, 2013, 06:40:51 PM
I respect the group's right to endorse a bullet-vote that crosses the ticket lines.  If they feel those are the best candidates for their issue, they have the right to do that.  It's a very difficult decision to make, because each ticket wants full support. Those candidates that win without getting the endorsal might not be as supportive after the election. That's the danger.

I remember back in 1989 the Borg's Woods Preservation Coalition (BWPC) was pressured to do the same thing, and there certainly WAS merit to a bullet-vote. With 300 dues-paying members and even more supporters, the BWPC's support was no small matter. There were 4 tickets, and 2 of the opposition candidates (one on each separate ticket) could have justified support. There was significant mistrust of Sandra Robinson, but she was part of the ticket. In the end, the BWPC didn't do a bullet vote, they endorsed a straight Zisa ticket, including Robinson.  It was a calculated decision to have the full support of the 5 elected officials after the election.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 07, 2013, 08:10:32 AM
This post & that of Prospect Avenue Coalition are also in "24-story tower for Summit Avenue"

I am not sure what manner you believe I addressed you in. I asked if Prospect Avenue residents are aware that there are other issues in the election. You did answer that by stating that for some Prospect Avenue residents there are no other issues in this election. Thank you.

I did request that post by 07601bergen be posted in the election thread. At first the editor did not think it needed to be and then he decided to put it in both places. I think he made the right call. It belongs in the other thread because it is related to the election and the election affects ALL city residents, not just Prospect Avenue. Most residents of this city are concerned with what happens on Prospect Avenue. It is not an island, it is part of the city. What happens in any one part of the city most certainly has an effect on other parts. I too think voters should be informed. I also think voters should vote with their heads based on all the facts and with regard to the city as a whole.

As I am not a member of the coalition, I was not privy to the information gleaned at the Prospect Avenue candidates nights. Since a recommendation was made that would affect those who are not part of the coalition, I thought other residents would be interested in an explanation as to why those candidates would be the best choice. Maybe there is something you know that the rest of us do not.

I did not speak with Joe Zisa one on one. I do not call him because he usually charges the city for telephone calls. He stated at the April 23 council meeting that he is in the process of transcribing the minutes of those zoning meetings. Maybe I wrongly assumed that in this digital age it would not be on paper. His statement was in response to a resident's question and seemingly in order to make a smooth transition on this issue. Of course ALL taxpayers are paying the bill for that.

Prospect Avenue residents have retained their own counsel for this issue. A resident of Prospect Ave has ties to that firm. I think the LTACH concerns are pretty well represented on this issue, both by the city and on their own. The rest of Hackensack should also be concerned as it affects us. The Prospect Avenue residents should also be concerned about the rest of the city, as it affects them too. The audience for this thread is the entire city, as well as some non-residents.

I do not believe that my post was misleading and erroneous. I hope I clarified that here. Most of the residents of Hackensack have been behind you in your fight. I simply thought, as it will have an effect on the rest of us, an explanation as to the recommendation would better inform those who are not part of the coalition. I guess you disagree.

Again, voters should vote with their heads. It is their vote, their voice.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 08, 2013, 07:42:58 AM
A piece on a recent endorsement that may be of interest with regard to the election

http://hackensackscoop.blogspot.com/2013/05/hitler-had-mein-kampf-communists-had.html
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 08, 2013, 09:02:33 PM
Battle lines drawn in Hackensack City Council campaigns (http://www.northjersey.com/news/battle_lines_drawn_in_hackensack_city_council_campaigns.html)
WEDNESDAY MAY 8, 2013, 8:11 PM
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD

HACKENSACK – The campaigns vying for City Council have reached a near-frenzied pace with days to go to the election, phoning voters, visiting door-to-door and mailing fliers, even as the discussion between opposing camps has turned sharp and negative.

Battle lines are drawn between two slates – one vowing to fight corruption the other touting community experience and open government – and one candidate running on his own calling for lower taxes and better quality of life. Candidates are making every effort to woo voters in a high-stakes election that could determine who holds power in the city for the next four years.

Tuesday’s election comes at a pivotal time for the city as it embarks on a major downtown rehabilitation project. And the city still is rebounding from a tumultuous time that saw allegations of cronyism, numerous lawsuits against the police and the city, and the conviction of former police chief Ken Zisa for criminal misconduct and insurance fraud.

The 11 candidates vying for five council seats each say they are the ones who can bring the city stability and progress.

The Open Government slate presents several likable candidates with deep community experience, but critics say it also is politically tied to a regime associated with Zisa and his family.

The candidates are Kenneth Martin, a retired, long-time school resource officer with the Hackensack Police Department; Jason Nunnermacker, a school board member and lawyer; Joseph Barreto, a guidance counselor and youth basketball coach; Joanne Mania Colon, a businesswoman and planning board member; and Scott Young, an information technology specialist who volunteers as a special police officer.

They’ve campaigned on promises of transparency: to put more information online, televise meetings and to establish boards to review ethics and civil litigation. The candidates, however, declined to respond individually to a questionnaire sent by The Record on issues of redevelopment, corruption and transparency. One joint response was sent by campaign manager Roger Mattei, who said the slate chose to answer as a team.

Opponents say the candidates have troublesome connections to the powerful Zisa family that has dominated the city during a troubled time.

Critics charge that the same political power brokers behind the Zisa family rule also pull the strings for Open Government.

 “They assembled a slate of Zisa yes men that will only continue the corruption and intimidation that has saddled Hackensack for decades,” said Councilman John Labrosse, a candidate with the slate Citizens for Change and the only incumbent in the race.

Some candidates and their supporters are connected by association because they are active in a city where “everybody knows everybody,” said Mattei, a former councilman and running mate of ex-mayor Jack Zisa.

The candidates say they are independent and unaffiliated with a political machine and don’t intend to do anyone else’s bidding.

“I would never compromise my beliefs for someone else’s wishes. Absolutely not,” said Barreto, saying he entered the race because of a longtime interest in politics and a desire to help the city.

Citizens for Change four years ago ran a ticket that propelled Labrosse into office, while his running mates lost. But their strong showings against four incumbents showed them as a real challenge against the political establishment.

The ticket includes a group of local activists who also have acted as government watchdogs and critics. The candidates are Kathleen Canestrino, a retired aerospace engineer; lawyer Rose Greenman; David Sims, a school paraprofessional; retired businessman Leo Battaglia; and Labrosse, who works in plant operation at Hackensack University Medical Center. Labrosse, Battaglia and Sims also volunteer in youth recreation programs.

The slate’s candidates present themselves as reformers who want to “clean up” government, scrutinize contracts and make sure city employees and contractors are there on merit, not because of who they know.

“We will sweep the slate clean of those long-time political usurpers who held on to power and profited handsomely on the misery of many,” Greenman said.

They also have called for a more citizen-friendly government where people can easily get information and air their concerns and they note they’ve been asking for televised meetings for years to no avail.

Victor E. Sasson, a former reporter and copy editor for The Record, is running on the Vote for Peace and Quiet line. He said he will work to reduce noise, repave streets, and crack down on stop-sign violators and speeders. He wants to save money by selling some employee take-home cars and by asking the Hackensack University Medical Center to pay more to the city in lieu of taxes.

Campaign rhetoric has turned harsh in recent days. Citizens for Change slammed their opponents over what they claim are ties to the old political order, while Open Government has spun Labrosse’s record in ways that some observers say are far fetched or false.

There also have been missteps. Martin was allegedly caught on video stealing opponents’ campaign signs and will go on trial in June for theft. The Open Government campaign used a school staff directory to get teacher addresses and send them campaign mail, in apparent violation of school district policy.

What’s clear is that the campaigns are fighting with fervor. The majority, if they vote as a bloc, will play a key role in the city’s rehabilitation plan and will have say over who works in the city and for the city.

The Record asked candidates for Hackensack City Council to tell readers about their backgrounds and answer questions about pressing issues in the city. Six candidates responded, while five from the Coalition for Open Government candidates provided a group response. All five council seats are up for grabs in the Tuesday election.

Leo Battaglia

Profession: Retired business owner, managed over 200 people, background in electronics.

Other relevant experience: Founder of the soccer program in the city. Sent 40 kids on to college on  soccer scholarships. One went on to play tin three World Cups. Supporter of recreation.

Q. What steps will you take to improve openness and transparency in government?

A. Transparency starts with the willingness of the administration to be cooperative and open with the public. We will instill that willingness throughout the administration. Every department head will be required to make reports at council meetings and to be cooperative with the public

We will make it easy for people to get information but putting more documents on the city website and we will end the stonewalling that occurs with OPRA requests.

Q. The city is dogged by the perception that favoritism and cronyism are prominent in government. How will you ensure fairness and restore the public’s trust?

A. The perception is reality. A small group of people control who gets work and contracts with this city.  We will open up the hiring process by making greater use of requests for proposals (RFP’s)  and will post them on the city web site. We will also put public contracts on the city website once awarded

Q. What can and should the council do to improve the city’s downtown?

A. We have to start with adding parking. We need three parking towers on the north , south and middle of Main Street. Midrise parking garages have been a  boom to towns such as Montclair and Hoboken. You can’t attract shopper or visitors without adequate parking. Secondly,  we need to attract a diversity of  business that people from the region want to patronize as well as people who live in the city

Kathleen Canestrino

Profession: retired aerospace engineer with 20 years at Honeywell International, Teterboro, NJ

Other relevant experience: A big part of my job was developing and maintaining multi-million budgets and securing government contracts at Honeywell.  Managing our city budget and enabling us to secure federal/state grant money is an integral part of running our city - I am up for the challenge. I am a 39 year resident of Hackensack. When I retired, I started attending council meetings on a regular basis. I began to realize that things had to change and I could be part of it.

Q. What steps will you take to improve openness and transparency in government?

A.  We will give our citizens a voice by putting citizen advisory boards in place with representation in each of our five wards. These boards will be headed up by ward leaders who will have bi-monthly communication with the council. We will televise all council meetings so more residents can be part of the decisions being made by our council.  Many times requests are made to our council with little to no follow-up.  We plan to record all citizen requests in an action item database, with required follow-ups and closure. Our website will be up to date with information from the city in an easy-to-read format. 

Q. The city is dogged by the perception that favoritism and cronyism are prominent in government. How will you ensure fairness and restore the public’s trust?

A. There will be zero tolerance for secret back room deals, special breaks for the politically connected, or threats and intimidation of our residents.

We are committed to creating an open and honest community. Citizens will be encouraged to bring their concerns and criticisms to the council or to department heads. There will be no reprisals for speaking your mind.

To help ensure that corruption and intimidation are stamped out, we will form an ethics commission that will hear citizen complaints against their government. The commission will be composed of at least one city council member, a member of the police department and several representatives of the community.

Q. What can and should the council do to improve the city’s downtown?

A. We support the development of Main St. I believe lower Main St should be a primary concern, because of the courthouse complex and the influx of visitors to that area during business hours.

We will lead the way to structuring a fair and well-designed redevelopment plan that will create hundreds of construction and permanent jobs for residents and increase tax revenue to the city, which will help lower property taxes and stabilize rents. We will institute a redevelopment commission, which will include Hackensack citizens, elected officials and development experts. The commission will evaluate development opportunities in the community, negotiate with prospective developers, gather public comments about redevelopment projects, and monitor projects to ensure that development standards are met. The Commission will also oversee the actions of the zoning and planning boards to ensure that all applications before the boards meet legal and ethical guidelines.

John P. Labrosse Jr.

Profession: mechanic in the plant operations dept. at Hackensack University Medical Center

Experience: Council member since 2009, youth wrestling coach

Q. What steps will you take to improve openness and transparency in government?

A. I have and would continue to work at making our City Government more open and transparent. I have fought for years to have our meetings televised. The people deserve this and it is not as hard as my opponents  have made it out to be. Many other towns and the County of Bergen do it, why can’t Hackensack.

 I would make more information available on our city website. This would free up employees to focus on other business. I would increase the time limit people are allowed to speak at council meetings and generally provide more answers for people in non-confrontational manner.

Q.  The city is dogged by the perception that favoritism and cronyism are prominent in government. How will you ensure fairness and restore the public’s trust?

A. It’s not a perception of favoritism and cronyism, its reality. Look at where the money goes and who benefits. Zisa the police chief, Zisa the town attorney, Zisa the insurance broker for the city. Malagiere the attorney for the Zoning board. On and on it goes. The small band of political insiders benefitting from public dollars .

For too long in Hackensack it’s been a matter of who you know or how much you contribute to campaigns  - not  your qualifications that matter. The taxpayers of Hackensack have not been getting their money’s  worth from many of our vendors. When you look at the political donations to the past administrations you see the same people donating and getting rewarded with lucrative contracts or jobs. That has to end.

Q.  What can and should the council do to improve the city’s downtown?

A. I am a big proponent of the rehabilitation of Main St. However, progress is very slow. There needs to be a broader approach to increasing parking and attracting new shops and restaurants. If done properly, the amount of tax revenue from a revitalized Main Street would increase tremendously -- which means lowering taxes and more money to invest in our roads and recreation. I believe it will have a catalytic effect and will spread to other areas over time.

Victor E. Sasson

Profession: Blogger; retired reporter, copy editor and food writer for The Record

Other relevant experience: Many years of municipal reporting experience and investigative journalism.

Q. What steps will you take to improve openness and transparency in government?

A.  Openness is a big issue, but voter apathy is bigger.

Nevertheless, I would make the budget process public and hold hearings at which city department heads will be asked to defend their budget requests. The goal would be to hold the line on the size of the budget in the first year, then cut it in the next three years, along with property taxes.

City Council agendas will be far more detailed than now and will not hide important information from the public.

City Council meetings will last a minimum of 2 hours, and residents will get twice as long to comment, 10 minutes instead of the current 5 minutes.

If there is sufficient demand, council meetings could be televised, but its far better for residents to attend meetings and bring problems in their neighborhoods to the attention of officials.

Routine record requests would be granted without asking residents to fill out forms or hire lawyers.

Q. The city is dogged by the perception that favoritism and cronyism are prominent in government. How will you ensure fairness and restore the publics trust?

A. I would end the city’s relationship with politically connected City Attorney Joseph C. Zisa Jr.; attorneys Richard Salkin, who is the school boards lawyer and municipal prosecutor; and Richard Malagiere; as well as the DiCotiis firm.

All other professionals doing business with the city would be reviewed with goal of replacing those who were not selected on merit, and that goes for city department heads and employees, as well.

Department heads and most other city employees will be required to live in Hackensack or own property in the city, and no city employee will drive home a city car unless they are on 24-hour call (a select few).

The city cant afford to offer tax breaks to developers, and the 30-year tax deal with the developer of a luxury apartment building on State Street would be rescinded.

Tax-exempt entities, such as the non-profit Hackensack University Medical Center, would be required to give back to the city by purchasing police cars, paving streets or planting vegetable gardens at the schools to fight the child obesity epidemic.

The city would return the HUMC ambulance service and EMTs to the Fire Department.

Q. What can and should the council do to improve the city’s downtown?

A. I would dismantle the Hackensack Main Street Business Alliance, and replace it with a city economic development office that would promote the entire city, not just part of Main Street.

Property owners now are assessed $360,000 a year to operate the alliance, which has accomplished little since it was formed in 2004. Instead, the city should use its own funds to sponsor free-parking days, Restaurant Weeks with discount meals and other promotions.

I would return Main and State streets to two-way traffic immediately, not wait for redevelopment, and the cost of traffic improvements would be reimbursed by developers.

One merchant wants to set up tables outside his Main Street hookah shop in the evenings for smokers, but has been prevented from doing so.

All building and zoning ordinances would be reviewed to liberalize policies on outdoor seating and dining with the goal of attracting new businesses and customers.

Dave Sims

Background: I’m a lifelong resident of Hackensack; a graduate of the Hackensack school system, where he lettered in  baseball and basketball.  I have a strong interest in helping young people and started the Hackensack Jr. Basketball Summer League program and became the Director of the Jr. Basketball and the All-Star program. Degree in Automotive Technology from Lincoln Technical Institute. I work as a para-professional for the Hackensack Board of Education.

Q. What steps will you take to improve openness and transparency in government?

A. I’ve always believed that if you have nothing to hide, why wouldn’t you want to share information. Obviously, the current administration which is backing our opponents, have a lot to hide and are determined to set up as many roadblocks as possible to stop the public from getting information they are entitled to.  I would be very pro-active in delivering information to the community, using the internet, not just our city web page, but perhaps an e-newsletter.  Televised meetings will help, but so would allowing the media to have more access to the council . I would like to host regular press briefings as well as meetings with people in the various wards and invite the press to attend those. 

Q. The city is dogged by the perception that favoritism and cronyism are prominent in government. How will you ensure fairness and restore the publics trust?

A. The only way to build public trust is to do everything open and above board. When a contract is let, it is important that people know why the contract is necessary and why the person or firm was chosen.  I would let it be known to the professional community that the old days or cronyism are gone and if they want to submit proposals they are welcome to do so; and that all proposals will be treated fairly. The days of people with “special connections” getting contracts will be over.

Q. What can and should the council do to improve the city’s downtown

A. Downtowns in the area are all struggling to battle the shopping malls and stay relevant. The key, I think is to provide plenty of inexpensive parking and attract businesses and services that people can’t get at the malls. Ridgewood is one of those towns that remade its downtown by becoming a restaurant hot spot. Hackensack can do the same thing. Fixing sidewalks and adding brick pavers and trees are nice, but they’re not going to revive downtown or bring jobs to the city.

Plus we need to do more to generate more nightlife downtown. We have to give a reason for  the people who work in the county building and the courts to stay for a couple of hours after work; and we need to generate investments in business that people want to come to from surrounding towns. And I think a police presence on the streets, cops walking the street -- would give people added comfort when visiting downtown. That’s something I would like to discuss with the new police director.

Hackensack Coalition for Open Government

Joseph Barreto: bilingual school counselor and former teacher in New York City public schools; Hackensack volunteer basketball coach

Joanne Mania Colon: account receivables manager and computer coordinator; Hackensack Planning Board member for 23 years; member of the New Jersey Cemetery Association and chairwoman of its annual convention; member of the New Jersey Business and Industry Association.

Kenneth Martin: retired Hackensack police officer/school resource officer; served on the volunteer ambulance corps, the Hackensack Auxiliary Police and the Red Cross; has been involved with the Martin Luther King Jr. Center, Johnson Public Library, New Jersey School Resource Officers as well as the National Association for School Resource Officers, North Jersey Regional Crime Prevention and the Hackensack Education Foundation.

Jason Nunnermacker: member of the Hackensack Board of Education Trustee and a practicing attorney; executive board member of the Hackensack Blue & Gold Scholarship Fund and the Hackensack Athletic Alumni Association.

Scott Young: information technology leader for compliance controls for GE Capital; special police officer (H-COP) in Hackensack; volunteer with anti-hunger organization Table to Table.

Q. What steps will you take to improve openness and transparency in government?

A. As the Hackensack Coalition for Open Government, we feel strongly about improving transparency and openness in government. We have developed a 10-Point plan that follows the direction of President Barack Obama’s Open Government Initiative.

1. Establish a local Ethics Board to monitor and review actions of city officials and employees in regard to conflicts of interest and other ethical violations.

2. Establish a Citizen Complaint Review Board to offer residents an alternate route in reporting unsatisfactory dealings with City departments.

3. Establish a Civil Litigation Review Board to assess the validity of claims against the city and review the related city policies and procedures.

4. Televise City Council meetings.

5. Publish proposed ordinances on our City Web site along with the opportunity for online public comment.

6. Create a process on our City Web site to allow for online petitions concerning local issues of interest and concern.

7. Require representatives of city departments to attend public council meetings to report on activities and answer questions from residents.

8. Issue monthly reports to residents describing the significant issues and activities for that month.

9. Reestablish and promote City Hall office hours for residents to seek the help and services of their City Council.

10. Formally Adopt the Local Open Government Principles.

Q. The city is dogged by the perception that favoritism and cronyism are prominent in government. How will you ensure fairness and restore the public’s trust?

A. We are committed to the maintenance of being a civil service community where hiring and promotions are done exclusively pursuant to the competitive exams promulgated by the State Civil Service Commission.

As to those instances where we are hiring or appointing professionals or other specialists such as engineers, attorneys, architects, accountants etc., we will work under a transparent fair and open process where interested applicants will have to submit responses to formal and public Requests for Qualifications. All such contracts awarded will be subject to the City's ability to cancel the contract at any time. If we find that a firm or individual is over billing our taxpayers, we can "pull the plug" and take the City's business elsewhere.

Q. What can and should the council do to improve the city’s downtown?

A. The Main Street corridor was once the place to go in Bergen County for shopping and dining. The Upper Main Alliance and the City Council have worked tirelessly over the last few years to improve the downtown district. They have created an entire rehabilitation zone and changed zoning requirements to make it easier for businesses to make Hackensack their home.

It will be our job to move this plan forward by supporting the mission of the alliance, possibly expanding the zone, and continuing to find ways to make the district more accessible. We will look at the parking studies, which have suggested two-way traffic and opening other one-way streets throughout the district. We will also assist the alliance in bringing developers to the area as well as premier retailers and eateries while enhancing shopper traffic for the many small businesses that keep the district alive.

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 08, 2013, 10:59:45 PM
This was omitted from the original article. I'll say it for you, Victor. Tsk, Tsk.

Rose Greenman

Profession: general practice attorney with emphasis on bankruptcy and immigration

Other relevant experience: secretary of the New Jersey State Bar Special Committee on Consumer Protection Law; Foreclosure Mediator, NJSBA  lecturer, businesswoman.

Q.  What steps will you take to improve openness and transparency in government?

A. To better enable communications between residents and city government, we will appoint ward representatives who will serve as liaisons for their wards and report on issues of concern particular to their area of the city.  Council meetings will finally be televised, so residents who were previously precluded from attending them for various personal reasons will have an opportunity to see the democracy in action.  The municipal website will be substantially updated and will provide easy access to public information that under the current regime required OPRA requests.  All municipal job openings are going to be posted on the website and open to best qualified candidates, not doled out to political appointees and opportunists.
 
 Q.  The city is dogged by the perception that favoritism and cronyism are prominent in government. How will you ensure fairness and the public’s trust?

A. We will not tolerate corruption, cronyism and favoritism that were part-and- parcel of the city's political regime for too many years.  Insidious back-room dealings of present political operatives that made our  proud and illustrious city the laughing stock of Bergen County will be disposed of promptly.  We will sweep the slate clean of those long-time political usurpers who held onto power and profited handsomely on the misery of many.  There will be zero tolerance to secrecy and political manipulations; no special breaks or shakedowns of big donors; no threats and intimidation of residents; no opagueness of political process, no special deals for the politically connected.  We are committed to creating an open and honest community where citizens are empowered and encouraged to bring their ideas, as well as concerns and criticism, to the table.  Our goal is to have a city government that is responsive to the residents and has their best interests in mind.

Q. What can, and should, the council do to improve the city’s downtown?

A. Our slate will restructure and improve the city building department's procedures to expedite Main Street and Downtown redevelopment.  We will open the redevelopment process to well-regarded and qualified developers with proven track records to give us a Downtown we can be proud of and which will boost tax ratables and lower our tax bills. We will create a well-designed and highly desirable Downtown with stores, restaurants and cultural venues that would bring visitors from Bergen County and beyond to shop, dine and be entertained in our Hackensack.  We project that this much  anticipated redevelopment will create a multitude of construction and permanent jobs and lead to a more prosperous and desirable place to live and do business.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on May 09, 2013, 08:04:10 AM
Wow, The Record allowed almost all the candidates to give individual comments, except the Coalition for Open Government. THey only had a group comment. 
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 09, 2013, 08:59:50 AM
Read the article. Open Government did not want to answer individually and chose to answer as a team. It would have been nice to hear their individual responses, but it was their choice to let someone else speak for the group. The answers were submitted by Mattei, not a candidate.

"They’ve campaigned on promises of transparency: to put more information online, televise meetings and to establish boards to review ethics and civil litigation. The candidates, however, declined to respond individually to a questionnaire sent by The Record on issues of redevelopment, corruption and transparency. One joint response was sent by campaign manager Roger Mattei, who said the slate chose to answer as a team."
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Victor E Sasson on May 09, 2013, 11:03:07 AM
Excuse me, Regina. What are you saying I did?
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 09, 2013, 01:54:53 PM
Sorry Victor, I did not say you did anything. The Record left out one whole candidate Q&A when article was posted online. I said tsk, tsk to them, not you.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Victor E Sasson on May 09, 2013, 03:31:29 PM
OK, thanks.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 09, 2013, 11:05:05 PM
For anyone who was paying attention:  I deleted an exchange between Regina and me at her request and upon further consideration of the circumstances. 
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on May 09, 2013, 11:25:11 PM
Regina is correct that Citizens for Open Government answered as a group. 

What is not necessarily correct is that they allowed someone else to answer for them.  How does Regina know how the group created their answers? There's a few scenarios (a) Did Mattei write it himself, as she implies, or (b) did the candidates get together as a group, decide their answers, and then direct Mattei to submit their group response to The Record. Or perhaps (c) Mattei drafted it, they reviewed it, changes were made, and then it was submitted.

She is presuming way too much.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 09, 2013, 11:37:50 PM
I quoted the article. What did I presume or imply? Maybe it was my choice of wording "let someone else speak for the group"? Well maybe he did not "speak" but Mattei submitted the answers, not the candidates.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on May 10, 2013, 07:14:16 AM
If your friends, Citizens for Change, had submitted their answers as a group, I would have not have presumed that their campaign manager spoke for them. I would have presumed that they, the candidates, had formulated the answers, and the campaign manager did nothing but submit them to The Record.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 10, 2013, 07:36:13 AM
You are the one who is making presumptions. Do not put something there that is not. I never gave an opinion as to who formulated the answers and clarified my use if the word "speak" just for your benefit. Read both of my posts again. I quoted the article. I never presumed anything. That was in your own mind. But since you put out 3 scenarios, and so you do not have to presume anything, I am going with some version of (c). I think more changes were made by the person who does all their writing and then it was submitted.

I think you post just to slam me.
Title: 2013 City Council election literature mailing mistake
Post by: BLeafe on May 10, 2013, 01:55:17 PM
It's déjà vu all over again.

Issues aside, I think I'd prefer the slate that at least has the intelligence to put some effort in getting my mailing info correct. You may recall me posting about a stupid addressing error that was made by one group in last year's school board election. If not, go here:

http://www.hackensacknow.org/index.php/topic,2388

There's a common name in that election and this year's council election and the mistake is exactly the same. And, of course, they still give no contact info for me to use.

Considering that and everything else I've read, these people appear to be in a perpetual (C)FOG.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 10, 2013, 02:06:55 PM
Yes, I remember that happening to you last election.

Here's some contact info

316 State Street
Hackensack, New Jersey 07601
.Phone (201) 414-8794
Email info@hackensackopengov.com

They took the info from the voter list and just merged people at the same address. I think CFC sends separate mailings to different names at the same address.
Title: Re: 2013 City Council election literature mailing mistake
Post by: BLeafe on May 10, 2013, 03:30:18 PM
Thank you. I just emailed them.


They took the info from the voter list and just merged people at the same address.

If that's what they did, then this has probably occurred on a pretty wide scale. Given the number of multi-unit residential buildings in Hackensack, I'm guessing that a lot of people are not pleased.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 10, 2013, 03:56:11 PM
I get the same thing on their literature sent to my house, two different names on one piece, so it is not just you.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: itsmetoo on May 11, 2013, 08:14:37 AM
Who is candidate #9?  Is he Joseph Barreto as indicated by CFOG literature or as the ballot indicates, Joseph Barretto? Does CFOG know? Does the County Clerk know?  Is it one "t" in his last name or two?
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on May 11, 2013, 09:07:36 AM
162 Rider said  "I would like to support women in politics but only if they are qualified. In 2008 I so wanted to vote for a woman candidate but could not go through with it just because the candidate was a female candidate."

Are you kidding me.  In 2013, this is your voting criteria ?  Why should I listen to your advise after your post that?
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on May 11, 2013, 02:54:55 PM
162 Rider, I read your comment again and I see that I completely misinterpretted it.  I got it 180 degrees backwards. If you read it again, you will see that there are two very opposite ways to interpret it.

I thought you were saying that you liked a candidate who happened to be woman, but then you couldn't go through with it BECAUSE she was a woman.  You weren't saying that at all.  I got it now.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: itsmetoo on May 11, 2013, 03:04:01 PM
162 Rider, I never suggested that you vote for someone just because she was a female.  I just said that it was interesting.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 11, 2013, 03:40:10 PM
So a strong woman is not a team player but a strong man is a leader? So 1950's..
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: itsmetoo on May 11, 2013, 06:35:18 PM
iI just received an automated call from Cory Booker endorsing The Open Government ticket.  I am a Democrat but what the heck does Cory Booker have to do with a non-partisan, Hackensack municipal election?  Open Government wants to distance itself from the past 4 years of political connections. HUH!!!
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 11, 2013, 07:42:20 PM
All along they have been saying they have no connections and then they do domething that shows that they do. They keep shooting themselves in the foot. Booker has no idea about Hackensack issues. The voters in Hackensack hopefully do and will see the contradictions. The Coalition would not have had to go outside the city for support if they felt they were getting it within the city.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 12, 2013, 06:35:24 PM
This is an exchange I had with Sen Weinberg on my Facebook page. She addresses the Booker robo call and "Tea Party" claim and the fact that Hackensack elections are nonpartisan

Regina Whitehead DiPasqua
18 hours ago near Hackensack
When the residents of Hackensack were asking for help from our elected officials did Senator Menendez or Cory Booker care? Did they want to get involved then? No and No. Why are they getting involved now? How about Valerie Huttle, Gordon Johnson or Loretta Weinberg, where do they stand?
2Like ·  · Promote · Share

Loretta Weinberg I must say I was rather surprised to just learn about this. I also think that perhaps Mayor Booker was misled by some. I respect everyone 's right to run in this NONPARTISAN election and I don't really know most of the individuals on either slate. However, I do know Mr. Labrosse's record on the Council, and I think it is admirable and worthy of support by the citizens of Hackensack!
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Loretta Weinberg I also do not think Ms Canestrino or her running mates are "Tea Party" folk. That's a very "over the top" accusation and makes it more difficult to fight the real "Tea Party" folk on issues!
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Regina Whitehead DiPasqua Thank you Senator Loretta Weinberg for responding. Mayor Booker has not responded to our requests for an explanation as to his reason for the robo calls asking for support of one slate in our nonpartisan election. I admire you for listening and responding to your constituents.
2 hours ago · Like
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on May 12, 2013, 08:20:05 PM
I am a former Hackensack resident who has lived in Newark since 2007.

I disdain the interference of partisan politics and especially Cory Booker in the Hackensack election.  Citizens for Open Government does not need Booker to win this election, all Booker is doing is taking a bet on who will win to have some new friends and allies after the election. Citizens for Change has their issues, but they are not tea party folks.

I know Cory Booker, I had a personal meeting with him 3 times on neighborhood issues.  He cares only about his own political career, and his stint as Mayor here is all about HIM, it's not about the people of Newark.  He is a "star" only because the ultra-left media has picked him as someone to be elevated into higher office. He is a better speaker than Obama, I must admit, and he can fool almost anyone into voting for him.  I could talk for pages and pages on how Booker has failed Newark and especially the relatively affluent Forest Hill Historic District where I live. How he took away our police resources and left us naked and exposed to the criminal element swarming in from a few blocks away, robbing homes and stealing cars. And he tried to sell off the city's precious watershed lands (32 square miles in the West Milford area)  for cash to plug a one-time budget gap.

And by the way, the black folks in Newark vote against him in droves because he has light skin, blue eyes, he supports gay marriage that the black religious folks in Newark can't stand, and he doesn't act black enough to be one of them. Booker wins a clear majority of the white, asian, Latino, and Portuguese/brazilian votes, and if he can muster 25% of the black vote, that's enough to put him over the top. Newark was 52% black in the 2010 census.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 13, 2013, 07:11:48 PM
There is a rundown of all candidates here:

http://www.northjersey.com/hackensack/?channel=/community&lbl=Community

Don't forget to vote tomorrow!
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 14, 2013, 09:21:44 PM
Citizens for Change wins. 

Preliminary results attached.

More to come...

Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Homer Jones on May 14, 2013, 09:32:40 PM
A wise old political sage once told Ol' Homer : "Always remember -- SIGNS DON'T VOTE!"
Looks like he was right.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: BLeafe on May 14, 2013, 10:13:41 PM
All aboard!

Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on May 14, 2013, 10:26:38 PM
Well, it's truly the end of an era for Hackensack, and the beginning of another.  Lots of heads are rolling, or going to roll, in the city administration.

Both slates had a strong vision for an improved downtown, and both groups strongly opposed the LTACH, so a few important things are not changing.  In the end, the split vote advocated by the Prospect Avenue Coalition didn't amount to much, and Newark Mayor Corey Booker picked the losers.  I'm laughing at Booker.

I love the city where I was born and raised, and that will never change no matter who is in power.  I truly hope that Hackensack becomes a better place. I wish the new city council the best, and I hope that they will accomplish something. 
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 14, 2013, 11:17:18 PM
Opposition slate sweeps in Hackensack Council elections (http://www.northjersey.com/hackensack/Opposition_slate_sweeps_in_Hackensack_Council_elections.html)
Tuesday, May 14, 2013    Last updated: Tuesday May 14, 2013, 10:54 PM
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

(http://media.northjersey.com/images/650*433/MC_0515a_hackelex_45p.jpg)
John Labrosse was handed a broom at the Elks Lodge after it was learned that he and his four running mates in Citizens for Change swept the election on Tuesday
KEVIN R. WEXLER / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER

HACKENSACK — Voters strongly broke with the past, electing a full slate of opposition candidates for City Council on Tuesday and shutting out a slate with ties to the political establishment that governed the city for decades.

The top vote-getters for five council seats were reformist incumbent John Labrosse, David Sims, Kathleen Canestrino, Leo Battaglia and Rose Greenman, who made up the Citizens for Change ticket.

Their election sweep and the change it signaled in city government followed years of corruption allegations, civil lawsuits and the criminal conviction of the police chief.

Citizens for Change toppled the Open Government slate of Jason Nunnermacker, Joanne Mania Colon, Joseph Barreto, Kenneth Martin and Scott Young. Critics had claimed that those candidates were tied to the political machine that has run the city for two decades amid turmoil. Victor E. Sasson, of the Vote for Peace and Quiet line, also trailed in the election results.

Hackensack Council votes
John Labrosse*    2,006
David Sims    1,911
Kathleen Canestrino     1,908
Leo Battaglia    1,804
Rose Greenman    1,788
_________________________
Jason Nunnermacker    1,677
Joanne Mania Colon    1,660
Joseph Barreto    1,656
Kenneth Martin    1,651
Scott Young    1,631
_________________________
Victor E. Sasson    344

Winners’ names in bold
*Denotes incumbent
Results are unofficial

Email: adely@northjersey.com

Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 15, 2013, 06:23:24 PM
Citizens for Change sweep Hackensack Council elections (http://www.northjersey.com/news/207477061_Citizens_for_Change_sweep_Hackensack_Council_elections.html)
Tuesday May 14, 2013, 10:28 PM
BY  JENNIFER VAZQUEZ
NEWS EDITOR
Hackensack Chronicle

HACKENSACK - The entire Citizens for Change slate won the five seats in the city council elections on May 14.

The winning candidates were incumbent John Labrosse, Kathleen Canestrino, Rose Greenman, Leo Battaglia and David Sims.

"This was a hard fought election," said Labrosse. "We offered a way to bring change to Hackensack, and that is what the voters wanted."

Canestrino shared the same sentiments.

"The numbers tonight show the election process worked," she said. "[The residents] knew we had to have a change."

Both Labrosse and Canestrino are excited that their running-mates will join them in office.

"It's great, but the work starts now," said Labrosse. "We have to work to maintain our promises."

The slate crusaded for openness within the city government - wanting to implement televised council meetings and make sure city employees and contractors are appointed to their positions based on merit and not who they know.

The Citizens for Change candidates ran against Victor E. Sasson and the Coalition for Open Government slate, which campaigned around reforming the Hackensack government with a 10-point plan, ending costly lawsuits aimed at the city and being accessible to city residents off-hours and during the weekends.

Those elected will be sworn into office on July 1.

Email: vazquez@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 16, 2013, 08:59:38 AM
Hackensack Council reform slate finds election sweep beyond 'wildest dreams' (http://www.northjersey.com/hackensack/Hackensack_Council_winners_find_their_election_sweep_beyond_wildest_dreams.html?page=all)
Wednesday May 15, 2013, 11:48 PM
BY  HANNAN ADELY AND STEPHANIE AKIN
STAFF WRITERS
The Record

The grass-roots group Citizens for Change, vowing to end political corruption and favoritism in Hackensack City Hall, won every City Council seat against daunting odds.

(http://media.northjersey.com/images/300*200/0516a_a8howtheydidit60p.jpg)
Hackensack Council candidate Kathleen Canestrino, center, reacting Tuesday night to news that she and the rest of the Citizens for Change slate had swept the city elections.
KEVIN R. WEXLER / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER
 
Hackensack Council candidate Kathleen Canestrino, center, reacting Tuesday night to news that she and the rest of the Citizens for Change slate had swept the city elections. It beat back a slate supported by a well-organized political machine that had more money and endorsements from a popular political figure.

The slate’s message, hammered home in mailings, meetings and in public forums, was constant: Its opponent — the Open Government slate — was tied to the political establishment that led the city into turmoil and alleged corruption. Residents weary of police trials, investigations and costly lawsuits embraced the message and voted in the candidates who promised to root out corruption and transform City Hall.

But the sweep surprised even those close to the team.

“We were hoping for three of five,” the slate’s campaign manager Thom Ammirato said Wednesday. “The sweep was just beyond our wildest dreams. I don’t even think even we estimated how deeply people wanted change.”

A group of residents, growing alarmed by alleged corruption in City Hall and in the Police Department, started meeting eight years ago. They ran a Citizens for Change ticket in 2005 that failed to win a seat.

The group’s members met sporadically over the years and kept up their criticisms and watchdog role in city government. Four years ago, they mounted another slate that propelled John Labrosse into office, but they said a third ticket siphoned away votes. Although Labrosse’s running mates lost, their strong numbers showed they were a growing political force.

The candidates used the same campaign strategies they used in the prior elections, going door to door and promising change and an end to corruption. This time, they didn’t have to contend with former Police Chief Ken Zisa, who allegedly intimidated police officers so they’d support certain candidates. Zisa was arrested in 2010 and later convicted of official misconduct and insurance fraud.

And they had an electorate that had grown tired of scandals in the city.

Walter Tompkins Jr. said he voted for the Citizens for Change slate – Labrosse, David Sims, Kathleen Canestrino, Rose Greenman and Leo Battaglia – because he was fed up with “corruption and deals.”

“They were always making deals for self-gain, especially with the police chief,” said Tompkins. “Everything seemed to be ‘I will do for you if you do for me.’Ÿ”

He recalled that the Citizens for Change group was out at council meetings, defending him and other emergency medical technicians who lost their jobs when the city contracted out their work.

The team still had to counter a slate that had key backing from the political establishment. Three school board members and six previous Hackensack mayors sent letters to residents endorsing the Open Government ticket. Even Newark Mayor Cory Booker weighed in with a robocall to residents over the weekend urging them to support the slate.

Open Government candidates denied that they were backed by the Zisa family that has dominated city politics for two decades or by political operatives associated with the Zisas. They said Lynn Hurwitz, the chairwoman of the city’s Democratic municipal committee and reputed key strategist for the Zisas, was a supporter but wasn’t involved in their campaign. Hurwitz did not return a request for comment Wednesday.

Open Government had amassed $45,100 in campaign donations, according to the 11-day pre-election report filed with the state, while the Citizens for Change had $19,536 for the same period. The slate also sent targeted mailings to teachers, police officers and firefighters, while their opponents questioned how they got access to those employees’ names and addresses.

Open Government also had a wealth of experience in the community as recreation coaches, police and school volunteers. They campaigned hard, going door to door in every neighborhood to greet voters and talk about their platform for government transparency and ethics.

It wasn’t enough to overcome the dominant belief that they were there to keep the establishment in power.

Meanwhile, Citizens for Change had about 50 volunteers on the ground going house to house, telling voters they could be part of the change in Hackensack if they’d vote their ticket.

“People felt they could be part of changing the government in the community and that their vote was going to matter,” Canestrino said.

State Sen. Loretta Weinberg, D-Teaneck, attributed their success to voter discontent.

“Citizens for Change represented an end to what has gone on in Hackensack over these last years, with the indictments, the convictions, the very expensive lawsuits and the issues around the Police Department,” she said.

“I think this group will represent, what I said on my Facebook page last night, honesty, integrity, transparency and inclusiveness. If they live up to that, they’ll be good government in Hackensack,” Weinberg said.

The reform candidates also might have benefited from a barrage of news articles about incumbent politicians’ misdeeds across the state in recent years, several political scientists said.

“We are in a reform period here in the sense that Chris Christie made real change the centerpiece of his first term as governor,” said Peter Woolley, a professor of government at Fairleigh Dickinson University. “Whether you like him or not, he’s made some big changes, so whether it’s Hackensack, or Jersey City or Atlantic City, reform is on people’s minds.”

Brigid Harrison, a professor of political science and law at Montclair State University, pointed out that the slate’s victory coincided with a similar overthrow of the established mayor in Jersey City, where City Councilman Steven Fulop defeated the scandal-plagued incumbent, Jerramiah Healy.

“These two races demonstrate a frustration on the part of voters with corruption and long-standing political machines,” she said. “When you look at the Fulop campaign and the Citizens for Change campaign, the message was very, very similar.”

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: itsmetoo on May 16, 2013, 10:33:46 PM
It is extremely quiet on these forums tonight!
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 17, 2013, 07:51:41 AM
I don't know about everyone else, but I am still in shock. And I have finally stopped crying tears of joy.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 17, 2013, 09:02:06 AM
Bergen County GOP figure to lead Hackensack transition team (http://www.northjersey.com/news/207830251_Bergen_County_GOP_figure_to_lead_Hackensack_transition_team_slate_taps_leader_for_transition.html?page=all)
Friday, May 17, 2013
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK — The team of candidates that swept the City Council election Tuesday has named a Franklin Lakes businessman and GOP figure to head its transition team, while warning the sitting council not to make any big moves in its final six weeks.

Anthony Rottino, who ran unsuccessfully for Bergen County Republican chairman last year, was tapped to lead a team that will help prepare the new council members to take office July 1. Until that happens, Citizens for Change has asked the sitting council to refrain from making new contracts, employment agreements, personnel changes or board appointments — a request some city officials said wasn't practical.

"My plan is to continue to run the city as I have run the city for the last years," said Mayor Michael Melfi, saying he'd help the new council make a smooth transition into city government.

Joe Zisa, the city attorney, said: "The council can do whatever they think is appropriate to run the city. They're still the City Council up until July 1 and I fully anticipate they'll honor the oath of office until July 1."

Councilman John Labrosse, who led the Citizens for Change ticket and was the only incumbent in the race, said the letter was a standard request to safeguard city residents.

"There's always a protocol when there's a changeover to make sure the incoming council has to be notified of any drastic changes," said Labrosse, whose slate pulled off an upset by winning every seat against a slate tied to the long-standing political establishment.

City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono said he spoke with Labrosse and that they understood it was intended to block extraordinary measures and not routine business. He said unions representing firefighters and fire officers just settled contracts, which the council expects to approve at its next meeting. A contract also is expected soon with a vendor for copy machines.

The letter, sent through attorney Frank Catania, also asks the city not to destroy any paper or electronic documents.

The Citizens for Change slate plans to meet with members of its new transition team and city officials to get information on contracts, finances and city projects.

The transition team will be led by Rottino, a businessman and developer who ran unsuccessfully against Bob Yudin last year for chairman of the Bergen County Republican Organization.

Rottino also has run unsuccessfully for Bergen County freeholder and in the GOP primary for a state Assembly seat representing the 40th District.

Labrosse said Rottino helped out in the Citizens for Change campaign.

He said Rottino knew a lot of people in municipal government and will assemble a strong transition team. His political past shouldn't matter, Labrosse said.

"We're not going to bring partisan politics into this," he said. "We haven't touched that."

Hackensack lawyer Ted Takvorian will serve as vice chairman of the transition team. Takvorian was a lawyer for the city's planning and zoning boards, a city prosecutor, and judge of the Municipal Court.

He also represented Labrosse's wife, Deborah, when she was sued on defamation allegations by then-Police Chief Ken Zisa over comments she made in an online forum. She countersued in 2009 and won a $75,000 settlement.

Other transition team members will be announced over the next week.

"We are seeking people with a thorough knowledge of government operations, the law, public works and budgeting to assist the new council members," said Rottino.

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 17, 2013, 09:12:27 AM
Winning Hackensack candidates plan their first moves (http://www.northjersey.com/news/207667221_Winning_Hackensack_candidates_plan_their_first_moves_making_its_moves_in_Hackensack.html?page=all)
Thursday, May 16, 2013
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK – The Citizens for Change ticket that swept the council election Tuesday campaigned on promises to shake up City Hall by rooting out corruption and opening government to the people.

Members of the slate, who will be sworn in July 1, say they are already taking steps to fulfill those promises. They've started putting together a transition team made up of people with municipal government experience to help draft a plan for their first months in office.

The council-elect team also sent a letter to the mayor and council Wednesday through an attorney, asking them to refrain from making or entering into any new contracts, new employment or collective bargaining agreements, personnel changes or board appointments. They also asked that all documents, paper or electronic, not be destroyed.

"We want to make sure everything is done correctly, ethically and responsibly so we can hit the ground running," said Kathleen Canestrino, who was elected along with incumbent John Labrosse, David Sims, Rose Greenman and Leo Battaglia. The slate will fill all five seats on the council.

The slate's win has left some City Hall staff worried about their jobs. The candidates and their supporters have for years questioned administrators and appointees over their ties to the political establishment and to the Zisa family that dominated city politics for two decades – a political rule that grew turbulent as allegations of corruption mounted.

Those ties influenced who got jobs in the city and which professionals got lucrative contracts, they claimed, driving up the cost of city government and passing it on to taxpayers.

Critics singled out lawyers who were paid millions for their work, largely to defend former Police Chief Ken Zisa against a slew of lawsuits filed by police officers. Zisa was convicted last year of official misconduct and insurance fraud and sentenced to five years in prison.

"On top of the list, we want to try to bring more harmony to the city and to put cards on the table and try to find the right people to operate the city," said Battaglia, in an interview Wednesday.

Battaglia and his team had pledged to employ people and companies based on merit, not political connections.

But decisions in personnel will only come after careful review, they said.

"The majority of people who work for the city are hardworking, good people. They know who they are and will continue to work and do the right thing for the city," Canestrino said.

People who haven't been performing in the best interest of the city, she added, "should be concerned."

Some efforts will take shape right away, Canestrino said, including the televising of council meetings — an action that she and other residents have requested for years. The new council members also said they will work quickly to revamp the city's website to post agendas and records online and to provide more thorough meeting minutes.

They also will establish boards for citizen input and post city volunteer positions and jobs online, Canestrino said. Openings on city land-use boards will be advertised instead of having people automatically reappointed.

"We will review fairly, openly and honestly the applicants and make the right decision," Canestrino said. "That's what should have been happening all along."

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on May 17, 2013, 09:16:50 PM
Regina,

This is the biggest upset victory in any city election in memory.  Maybe even within the memory for the older folks ?  You have earned the bragging rights. Go for it. :)
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Homer Jones on May 17, 2013, 09:26:26 PM
Biggest upset since Oratam won the tribal chief job quite a few years ago.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on May 18, 2013, 05:07:10 AM
Not my style to brag. When I firmly believe in something I will go all out in support of it and keep myself informed about it, which is what I did during this election. For the past 4 years I have attended almost every Council & COW meeting. I learned a lot. I am confident that things will change in Hackensack and that the new Council will do what is in the best interest of the residents, not special interest groups.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 18, 2013, 10:19:18 AM
Low turnout prompts Hackensack to consider November election (http://www.northjersey.com/news/207978231_Low_turnout_prompts_Hackensack_to_consider_November_election_can_boost_turnout__towns_say.html?page=all)
Saturday, May 18, 2013
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK — Despite heated campaigns, massive get-out-the vote efforts, and a wide pool of candidates, voter turnout in the City Council election Tuesday was only around 17 percent.

Turnout in May elections historically is low for reasons that include apathy, voter fatigue and lack of awareness. Now, more towns and cities — hoping to increase turnout and save money — are moving elections from May to November after a 2010 state law made it easier to switch while allowing municipalities to still hold non-partisan races.

Hackensack is expected to follow that trend.

"May elections in general are very apathetic. It's hard to get turnout. Even in a hot election like this we ended up losing voters," said Councilman John Labrosse, referring to the slight drop in voters since the last council election.

Four years ago, 3,659 people voted, or 18.4 percent of all registered voters, according to figures provided by the city clerk and county Board of Elections.

On Tuesday, 3,513 — or 17.2 percent — voted.

Labrosse won the election along with four others on the Citizens for Change team. The pro-reform slate has called for a switch to November elections in the past; now that they hold all five seats on the council, they plan to make the change before the next election in four years.

Under a law adopted in 2010, municipalities can by ordinance move their non-partisan municipal elections — held the second Tuesday in May — to coincide with the general election in November.

Out of 568 municipalities in the state, 82 have non-partisan elections, said Ed Purcell, a lawyer with the New Jersey State League of Municipalities. Of that number, 29 have switched their elections to November while 53, including Hackensack, Passaic and Clifton, still have it in May.

In addition to raising turnout, towns save money by moving to November. The municipality is responsible for all costs and duties involved in a May election; in the fall, the cost is shared, Purcell said.

In Passaic's contentious mayoral race Tuesday, only 24 percent of the city's registered voters turned out — down from 35 percent in 2009.

Experts say voters grow tired of voting several times a year for school, municipal, state and federal elections, and sometimes have a hard time differentiating among the issues.

David Sims, one of the Citizens for Change slate members, recalled that a supporter showed up at the polls to vote for him during the school board elections in April, having confused the two dates.

"People just aren't accustomed to voting in May and in April," he said. "They're more accustomed to voting in November. It's too much."

Terry Golway, director of the Kean University Center for History, Politics, and Policy, described turnout in spring elections as "scandalously low."

"Hackensack had a bitterly contested election," he said. "Jersey City had a typically rough-and-tumble election. But it just doesn't register on the voters."

He said the spring elections held advantages to organizations and special interests.

"By keeping the number of people going to polls low, you can better control them," he said. "So political organizations and special-interest groups have a vested interest in keeping the election in springtime."

Still, supporters say May non-partisan elections keep big-party politics out of municipal races and keep the focus on important local issues.

"That's understandable," Golawy said, "but from a practical perspective it just doesn't seem to work."

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Prospect Avenue Coalition on May 19, 2013, 12:07:12 AM
Both slates had a strong vision for an improved downtown, and both groups strongly opposed the LTACH, so a few important things are not changing.  In the end, the split vote advocated by the Prospect Avenue Coalition didn't amount to much, and Newark Mayor Corey Booker picked the losers.  I'm laughing at Booker.

@Just Watching, ProspectAvenueCoaltion did not advocate or endorse any candidate or slate during this election. We did organize 4 Meet the Candidates Nights for our members and their neighbors so that we could get to know the candidates and their views. We make the information available to our members but they make up their own minds for whom to vote. If our members who are at the same time residents and voters want to suggest a split vote we will not attempt to suppress their voice.

Our focus as a coalition was to make all the candidates aware of how important the LTACH issue is to the residents living on Prospect, Overlook and Summit Avenues and to ascertain how the candidates planned to find the funding needed to defend the City againt the LTACH during the appeal process which could continue beyond the end of the next term.

Towards that end we have been very successful in achieving our goal and our mission was accomplished.

Please see our message which was posted on the 24-story Tower on Summit Avenue:

ProspectAvenueCoalition would like to congratulate the Citizens for Change slate for winning yesterday's election. We are confident you will honor commitments made during the election to defeat the LTACH and look forward to an open government with free flowing information. We also wish you success on addressing the many other issues that affect our city from development of downtown to lowering taxes.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: just watching on May 19, 2013, 07:49:22 AM
No way. Don't try to change history now that the election is over.  I like your group and I fully support and admire your work to stop this atrocity on Summit Ave, but stop the nonsense, please.

Both 07601Bergen and 162Rider posted statements in this election thread that the Prospect Avenue Coalition endorsed the split ticket.  In fact, 162Rider referred to it as the "Prospect Avenue Coalition United Member Vote".  A review of the 24-Story Tower Thread shows another person, HackRes, making a similar statement. 

And a review of the election results shows that those candidates got about 20 votes more than the others on their respective slates in your voting district. So there definitely was a "united vote" on a split ticket that some of your members voted as a group.  The fact that this big zoning dispute only amounted to 20 votes was to me as big a surprise in this election as the final city-wide vote, because I had been expecting a bounce of a couple hundred votes towards one ticket, like was done in 1989 out of W5D3 and W5D4.  You know, something enough to nudge one ticket over the top for the entire city, like was done in 1989, the year Jack Zisa was first elected.  A 20 vote bounce towards the Prospect Avenue Coalition United Member Vote isn't so impressive, and it didn't carry the election.

And with all the hoopla, the total votes out of the Prospect Avenue area was hardly up over previous city elections.

Yes, there is a statement, from you (ProspectAvenueCoalition), in the 24-Story Tower thread, with differing information. You posted a letter from Ted Moskowitz who was endorsing the entire Open Government ticket.  Thank you for referring us all back to that.

What this all tells me is that the Prospect Avenue Coalition was deeply divided, and that key individual leaders of the group including yourself disagreed with the decision of the organization to select the Prospect Avenue Coalition United Member Vote.  Sorry, I call it as I see it. I hope that the Citizens for Change city administration supports your cause even though you personally endorsed Citizens for Open Government by posting the Moskowitz letter, and even though your organization only supported 2 of their candidates.  If they are concerned about the big picture for Hackensack and not a bunch of petty politicians, they will support your cause.


Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 20, 2013, 09:16:30 AM
Kelly: Hackensack candidates took on political machine one door at a time (http://www.northjersey.com/columnists/kelly/Kelly_Hackensack_candidates_took_on_political_machine_one_door_at_a_time.html?page=all)
Sunday May 19, 2013, 10:46 PM
By MIKE KELLY
RECORD COLUMNIST

As she knocked on doors in the final days of her successful campaign to unseat Hackensack’s powerful Zisa family political machine, council candidate Kathleen Canestrino says she made a startling discovery.

Yes, voters were clearly upset with the Zisas’ ruling style, which critics have lambasted as self-indulgent, insular and, in recent years, a magnet for numerous expensive lawsuits, many of them filed by police officers who claimed they were forced to mix politics with law enforcement. The criticism grew even more pronounced last year when former Police Chief Ken Zisa, a major Democratic power broker, was convicted of official misconduct and insurance fraud.

But Canestrino found that voters harbored a far more basic complaint, one that she said played a crucial role in last week’s stunning defeat of the five-member Zisa-backed council slate. In voters’ minds, the Zisa machine couldn’t fill the potholes or pick up the garbage.

“It was the No. 1 complaint,” Canestrino said.

Political machines are not complicated. They build power by doling out favors and jobs to loyalists and getting more voters to the polls on Election Day than their opponents. But the most successful machine-run governments also retain power because they efficiently deliver basic municipal services to ordinary people.

This is how the Zisas ultimately failed. The family dynasty, whose bare-knuckle control of Hackensack over more than four decades earned the city the nickname “Zisaville,” was finally tripped up by a stunning inability to fill potholes or haul the garbage away before it started to stink too much.

“When I knocked on doors, I would ask people if they were happy,” said Canestrino. “If they said no, I would then ask what made them unhappy. And more often than not, they pointed to the potholes in the street or talked about the garbage.”

The message has not been lost on Canestrino.

Once the members of her Citizens for Change slate take their seats on the council, she said, a priority will be to pass a resolution to have the garbage picked up more than once a week. She also said her slate wants to appoint neighborhood representatives or ward leaders to keep tabs on potholes.

Thom Ammirato, the Citizens for Change campaign manager, said the group did not have enough money for professional polling during the campaign. So he said Canestrino and other candidates developed a strategy of informally asking voters what bothered them.

“We were just listening for feedback,” Ammirato said.

But what they heard was somewhat surprising, he said. Besides potholes and garbage pickup, he said voters also listed flooding and basic street sweeping as common concerns.

In the future, Canestrino said, her slate wants to find a way to pay attention to basic needs of residents.

“We want to listen to people,” Canestrino said.

It’s a noble goal, one that even the Zisa family embraced when it first emerged as a major political force in Hackensack in 1969, the year Frank Zisa became deputy mayor. His brother Joe became city attorney a year later.

“But over time they just got drunk with power,” said Jon Gilmore, a former president of the city’s African-American Civic Association and a Zisa critic. “They just got caught up with themselves. They were in their own bubble.”

Such was the growing perception anyway.

In 1977, Frank became mayor and Joe was named a municipal judge. In 1989, Frank’s son Jack became mayor, a position he would hold for the next 16 years. During that time, Jack, an insurance broker, appointed his brother Ken as police chief and another brother, Frank, as deputy chief. A cousin, Joe, was named city attorney in 2005.

Ken Zisa, who was forced out as police chief amid his legal troubles, also served as a state assemblyman and emerged as a power broker within the Bergen County Democratic Organization. Meanwhile, his older brother Jack became a powerful force in Bergen’s Republican Party.

The Zisas developed a formidable coalition. They gave key municipal jobs to friends and relatives. They also shaped campaign tickets for the city’s non-partisan elections that represented a variety of political viewpoints and racial and ethnic backgrounds. And with the help of one of North Jersey’s most experienced political operatives, Lynne Hurwitz, they regularly brought together a solid block of votes on Election Day.

But what seemed like a recipe for continued political success slowly began to crumble over the last decade.

Moribund downtown

One of the most notable and embarrassing problems was the city’s Main Street. While business districts in other economically and ethnically diverse towns — Englewood, Montclair and Morristown, for example — bustled with new businesses, Hackensack’s seemed mired in failure. A once-thriving regional hub of stores and offices had become a mix of empty storefronts, discount outlets and fast-food cafés that were mostly deserted after 5 p.m. each day.

Developers blamed the Zisas for not having the vision to put together a master plan to attract new investors while also catering to the needs of longtime business owners.

“They’ve made it impossible to want to develop in this community,” said Michael Monaghan, a lawyer who owns nearly an entire block of Main Street property and has fought the Zisas for years in a series of lawsuits.

“If you didn’t play the game,” Monaghan said, “you didn’t get the results.”

City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono said he believes Hackensack finally has a solid plan to redevelop Main Street. But critics say the new plan is at least a decade too late and that Hackensack is now several steps behind other towns in terms of its economic development.

Lo Iacono says his city’s “future is bright.” But he acknowledged that the process of restoring life to downtown Hackensack may take another “seven, nine or 10 years.”

Lo Iacono said he may not be around to see the changes in Hackensack — if they come. He said the new council may dismiss him because of his ties to the Zisas.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if they wanted to make a change,” Lo Iacono said, adding that he has not heard anything definite yet. None of the five newly elected council members would say whether they intend to fire Lo Iacono or anyone else.

Another Main Street property owner and former Zisa ally, Richard Gelber, said he became a vocal critic of the political machine when the city government did little to help him attract new renters. Gelber said five of his 13 commercial properties are empty. One storefront has not been rented in nearly seven years, he said.

“Believe me, the Zisa day is over in Hackensack,” Gelber said.

That may be wishful thinking.

The Zisa machine, whose council slate ironically ran under the “Open Government” banner, still controls the city’s Board of Education — and, as a result, directs the hiring of teachers and other employees in the public schools. Also the Zisas still have considerable influence among Hackensack’s roughly 15,000 registered Democratic voters and are regularly courted by statewide and even national candidates.

Still, last week’s election clearly was a turning point. Just how sharp a turn the city is taking remains to be seen.

None of the dominant figures in the Zisa family — Jack, Ken, Frank or Joe — commented on the council elections. Hurwitz, who is the city’s Democratic municipal chairwoman as well as a Zisa adviser, did not return several phone messages.

Reached by phone at his law office, another key Zisa ally, Richard Salkin, the city prosecutor and school board attorney, offered only this clipped, terse response: “There has been an election. The voters have spoken. I wish the new council the best. That’s all I’m going to give you.”

Meanwhile, Canestrino and her slate promise to give Hackensack a more transparent government, free of the kind of nepotism that was a hallmark of the Zisa era.

But while Canestrino was elated with her slate’s victory, she said she understands the pitfalls that can trip up any political group that gains power. All she had to do was look back to when the Zisas grabbed control of Hackensack.

“People start out well-intentioned,” Canestrino said. “What happens when you are in office for that long, you build up this network and it’s just too easy to become self-invested in the process.”

Running for office taught her a lesson, however, that she hopes she does not forget.

“You see things differently through other people’s eyes,” she said.

Email: kellym@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 25, 2013, 11:54:19 AM
Bipartisan team tapped for Hackensack transition (http://www.northjersey.com/news/208923161_Bipartisan_team_tapped_for_Hackensack_transition.html?page=all)
Saturday, May 25, 2013
BY  JOHN C. ENSSLIN
STAFF WRITER
The Record

The chairman of the transition for the new council majority in Hackensack announced a bipartisan team Friday to help advise them on their July 1 takeover of city government.

And an attorney for the transition committee has requested budget, financial and other documents to help with the transition.

Transition Chairman Anthony Rottino said state Sens. Loretta Weinberg, D-Teaneck, and Kevin O’Toole, R-Cedar Grove, have agreed to serve as honorary chairs of the transition team.

Other members will include: attorney Thomas P. Scrivo; Cedar Grove Township Manager Tom Tucci; Assemblyman Gordon Johnson, D-Englewood; Deborah Keeling-Geddis, a community activist and former council candidate; and Bergen County Freeholders Maura DeNicola and Steve Tanelli.

The committee is advising Councilman John Labrosse and his running mates, Kathleen Canestrino, David Sims, Rose Greenman and Leo Battaglia, who were swept into office May 17 as the Citizens for Change ticket.

Scrivo sent a letter this week on behalf of the transition committee to City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono requesting 33 sets of documents, including:

- The 2012 and 2013 budgets.

- The most recent city debt service report.

- Copies of all current labor contracts.

- Current city workers’ compensation and general liability insurance policies.

- Money paid to insurance brokers and consultants in 2013.

- A list of all professionals (legal, accounting, engineering) retained by the city in the last three years.

- 2013 statements for all city bank accounts.

- A synopsis of all pending litigated matters involving the city and/or its employees.

"Hopefully the administration will be cooperative and will forward us the documents as quickly as possible," Rottino said in a prepared statement.

Lo Iacono said he received the letter Friday and had directed various department heads to begin pulling together the information for the committee.

"It’s quite voluminous," Lo Iacono said. "It’s going to take a little bit of time. I’m working on it as we speak."
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 29, 2013, 08:35:09 AM
HACKENSACK TRANSITION TEAM CHAIRMAN ANNOUNCES NEW APPOINTMENTS (http://www.politickernj.com/65879/hackensack-transition-team-chairman-announces-new-appointments)
PolitickerNJ
By Thom  | May 28th, 2013 - 10:16am   
 
Anthony Rottino, the chairman of the transition team for the Hackensack council-elect announced seven new members to transition team. He also released a letter from the team’s attorney to the city administration asking for a roster of documents that the team can begin reviewing as it prepares the new council members for their takeover of city government on July 1.

Rottino announced that honorary chairpersons  for the transition team will be State Sen. Loretta Weinberg (D-37) and State Sen. Kevin O’Toole (R-40).

Rottino said the transition team is fortunate to have two experienced legislators consulting with the team.  “It is important to have people like Sen. Weinberg and Sen. O’Toole  who are well respected in Trenton – and who we can turn to for help should we need advice or intervention from state government,” said Rottino.   

"I believe we have assembled a team of accomplished and knowledgeable people who will provide us great advice and insights as the council-elect team prepares to run the city," said Rottino

The attorney for the transition team is Tom Scrivo a partner with the law firm of McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP ("MDM&C") with offices in Newark and Morristown.

Scrivo is a highly skilled attorney who serves as the attorney to three New Jersey municipalities. Scrivo has served as special counsel to municipalities for matters involving real estate tax appeals, labor and employment, construction litigation, civil rights litigation, public bidding and contracts, redevelopment law, and election law. Scrivo is the author of the treatise, New Jersey Local Government Deskbook, which is updated annually.

Rottino said: “Scrivo is well respected in the legal community and he literally wrote the book on municipal law. His knowledge of municipal legal matters is comprehensive and he will be an important asset to bridging the gap between the outgoing administration and the incoming one.” 

RECORDS REQUESTED

Scrivo last week sent a letter to the city on behalf of the council-elect seeking numerous documents including budgets, financial statements, insurance agreements and policies, labor contracts and all pending litigation matters.

Rottino said the information is important to get as quickly as possible so the team can begin evaluating the city’s finances, debt, insurance and other matters. “In order for the council- elect to begin to make the changes that will lower the cost of government and improve services, we  need to evaluate where the city stands in a number of critical areas, including finance and personnel,” said Rottino.

“Hopefully the administration will be cooperative and will forward us the documents as quickly as possible,” said Rottino. (see letter attached)

OTHER APPPOINTEES

Thomas Tucci is joining the transition team as the government operations director. He has 31 years of municipal government experience and has served for 17 years as Cedar Grove Township Manager. He is also a state Certified Public Works Manager. Most notably, Tucci served on Gov. Christie's Transition Team to Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission that resulted in a complete restructuring of the scandal-plagued organization that saved ratepayers millions of dollars.  He also serves as an executive board member of the New Jersey Intergovernmental Insurance Fund.

Also serving on the transition team is Assemblyman Gordon Johnson (D-37). Johnson is the Assembly Majority Conference Leader, a member of the Assembly Budget Committee, the Judiciary Committee and the Regulated Professions Committee. He has served 24 years with the Englewood Police Department, attaining the rank of sergeant.  He is experienced in labor relations and has served as president of the State P.B.A. Supervisory Officers Association-Local #216. 

In 1999, he was appointed undersheriff of Bergen County.  He subsequently became sheriff from January 18, 2001 through January 1, 2002.  When the newly elected sheriff took office, Johnson was asked to continue with the Bergen County Sheriff’s Department as undersheriff, responsible for the Bergen County Jail. 

Rottino says Johnson brings not only police experience to the team, “but as a leader in the African American community, he is an important conduit for sharing information with and expressing the concerns of that community.”

Deborah Keeling-Geddis,  a long-time community activist, and city council candidate in 2001 has also been added to the team. She is former aide to Assemblyman Gordon Johnson and founding member George M. Stuart Music Scholarship Fund for kids 8-18 for private music lessons.

Rottino said Keeling-Geddis role will be as community liaison, working to transmit information to the public and received feedback during the transition phase. She will also be working on establishing criteria for the ward representatives that the council-elect team wants to create as a means to gathering more input from the community.   

Also serving on the transition team is Bergen County Freeholder Maura DeNicola and Freeholder Steve Tanelli. DeNicola was council member and mayor of Franklin Lakes and was elected to the freeholder board three years ago. Tanelli served on the North Arlington Council from 2004 to 2013 when he was sworn in as freeholder.   

Rottino said DeNicola and Tanelli have experience on the municipal and county levels of government and have each gone through a government transition. “Having Freeholders DeNicola and Tanelli on board is a big plus for the council-elect. Their experience in local government will be helpful to the new council members in preparing them to take office. They can also be of immense help in guiding the new council toward the services that county government can offer the city.”
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: BLeafe on June 29, 2013, 09:58:02 AM
Hackensack braces for big changes as new City Council members prepare to take office (http://www.northjersey.com/hackensack/Hackensack_braces_for_big_changes_as_new_City_Council_members_prepare_to_take_office.html?page=all)
Saturday June 29, 2013, 12:15 AM
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

Hackensack’s new leaders long have said they’ll clean up City Hall by ending cronyism, favoritism and “insider deals” that have benefited people with political connections.

But since their upset win against the establishment-supported ticket, the council members-elect have said little about who will stay and who will go, though they are certain to make changes as they seek to assert their leadership and fortify City Hall after decades of dominance by the Zisa political family and its allies. The new council confirmed it will replace the city attorney upon taking office Monday, but the fate of others remains unclear.

The incoming council members referred questions to spokesman Thom Ammirato, saying they want to unify their message but don’t want to cause alarm in City Hall.

Councilwoman-elect Kathy Canestrino, a vocal government critic for years, spoke only briefly about the matter last week. “We haven’t decided what positions if any we will change,” said Canestrino, one of five people on the Citizens for Change ticket that swept the June 14 election. “We’re getting information from the city.”

Ammirato said the council expected to change half a dozen positions in the first six months in office, including staff and contract professionals.

“What we would do would be consistent with what any other administration would do in North Jersey,” he said. “You come in and want to appoint people you can trust and work with.”

Hackensack’s new council will wield considerable power in a city that’s home to the county seat and is embarking on a massive downtown rehabilitation plan that is already bringing in millions in development dollars. The new council says it will set up commissions to review ethics and redevelopment that will help ensure City Hall is run in a transparent and fair manner.

The task for the newcomers isn’t just to change administrations but to change the culture and politics in a City Hall that has been under the control of a political dynasty. The Zisas have served in various political offices and as heads of departments and, critics say, doled out patronage jobs to supporters.

Ammirato said the new council would not be on a “witch hunt” — “If you’re doing your job and doing it well, you don’t have to worry.”

Canestrino and Councilman John Labrosse, who was reelected and is expected to become mayor on Monday, have been critical of certain staff and professionals in the past.

The team also has suggested it will replace long-serving land-use board appointees who they say have perpetuated a culture of insider deals.

For the new council, hiring new people is a matter of self-preservation, as the displaced political powers may try to launch a comeback in four years.

Here are some officials and appointees whose positions could be in jeopardy:

Joseph Zisa: Critics allege that legal bills have spiked under Zisa, the city attorney, partly because he has declined to settle lawsuits, saying it was a city policy not to settle. He also had to recuse himself from lawsuits that piled up against his cousin, former Police Chief Ken Zisa, and hire outside attorneys for that work. Ken Zisa was sued by more than 20 police officers who claimed he ruled the department under intimidation and the threat of retaliation.

Labrosse confirmed late Wednesday that Zisa will not be reappointed when his term expires Sunday. The council, he said, plans to appoint an interim city attorney Monday, but he declined to say whom.

Stephen Lo Iacono: The city manager since 2005, Lo Iacono makes departmental appointments and manages day-to-day operations. Critics say he has done too little to stem problems in the Police Department or to contain skyrocketing legal bills.

Lo Iacono said the legal bills were a necessary response to a great number of suits. He said he dealt with problems in the Police Department by discussing them with the chief and supervisors and respecting the chain of command.

He dismissed the accusation that he’s a “mouthpiece” for the Zisas: “It just isn’t true.”

“I’ve tried to stay out of political stuff all along and I think I’ve done a good job there,” he said. “But I also understand they may want to bring their own person so I’d have to respect that.”

Joseph Mellone: Critics say Mellone, the construction official in charge of the Building, Housing and Land Use Department, is part of a close-knit group that has commanded the city.

Mellone was sued for alleged sexual harassment by an employee in his department and has been suspended twice. The Record reported in December that his office failed to enforce basic safety standards on rental homes owned by a pair of high-profile landlords with political connections to the city. One of the landlords is lawyer Richard Malagiere, former zoning board attorney.

Mellone said he has been held accountable for decisions made within his department. “There are things that happen in any position and you need to move forward,” he said.

Every application, he added, goes through the same procedures and gets the same scrutiny. He said he welcomed guidance from the new council. “My department still has a job to do and I believe we do a great job here,” he said.

The city manager, not the council, has the power to appoint the construction official from a civil service list. As a tenured employee, Mellone has strong job protection.

Richard Malagiere: He’s no longer the zoning board attorney, having declined to seek the position this year after The Record reported serious violations at two of his rental properties, including one where a fire occurred. But Malagiere — a close friend of the Zisas — continues as outside counsel on several land-use cases, including a major lawsuit over a proposed long-term acute care hospital.

Critics say his bills to the city are unreasonably high — he made at least $770,000 for his work on Hackensack police lawsuits alone.

In January, Bergen County Prosecutor John Molinelli asked a federal judge to disqualify Malagiere from several of the civil cases related to Ken Zisa because of a conflict of interest — in part because Malagiere was using depositions in the civil cases to gather information that Zisa could use in his criminal case, contrary to court rules.

Zisa was convicted of official misconduct and insurance fraud last year.

Still, some tenant leaders and hospital opponents have called for Malagiere to stay on the hospital case. Canestrino said during campaigning that she’d consider keeping Malagiere only on the hospital lawsuit — but with co-counsel in case he needs to step down later as a result of the controversy over his rental properties.

The city attorney said he is able to appoint contract lawyers from a list approved by the City Council.

Other contract professionals: Citizens for Change alleges that some contract professionals, including lawyers and insurance brokers, have gotten work from the city because of political connections or political contributions.

The new council members say, through their spokesman Ammirato, that they’ll open up the hiring process by using more requests for proposals and posting openings on the city’s website. They pledged to hire based on merit.

Land-use boards: Critics say some long-serving members of the planning and zoning boards have pushed the agendas of political figures and their favored developers. Appointees serve three-year terms, after which the council can reappoint them or choose someone new. Citizens for Change says the new council will advertise openings and widen the pool of candidates.

Ammirato said the council members-elect already were interviewing professionals for jobs in the city, and that he and Anthony Rottino, a Republican who heads the council’s transition team, expect to stay on as staff or contract employees after the council takes office Monday.

Ammirato said he may continue working in a communications post, while Rottino will likely be offered a job related to development oversight in the city.

Rottino declined to comment and directed the call to Ammirato.

Rottino owns several businesses, including real estate and insurance companies. He ran unsuccessfully for Bergen County Republican chairman last year and for the 40th District Assembly seat in 2009.

Although the council members-elect did not want to talk about upcoming changes for this story, they’ve said plenty in the past to indicate that City Hall will look vastly different in four years.

In a candidate questionnaire, Councilwoman-elect Rose Greenman said the team wouldn’t tolerate cronyism or favoritism “that were part and parcel of the city’s political regime for too many years.”

“We will sweep the slate clean of those longtime political usurpers who held on to power and profited handsomely on the misery of many,” she said.

Labrosse, in his response, said: “When you look at the political donations to the past administrations you see the same people donating and getting rewarded with lucrative contracts or jobs. That has to end.”


Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on July 01, 2013, 11:27:37 PM
Zisa, others out as new Hackensack council takes over (http://www.northjersey.com/hackensack/Changes_made_swiftly_as_new_council_takes_over_in_Hackensack.html?page=all)
Monday, July 1, 2013    Last updated: Monday July 1, 2013, 11:18 PM
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK — A new era at City Hall was marked Monday night by announcement of up to 19 changes in municipal government, as the council immediately replaced three professionals tied to the Zisa political family and moved to advertise the other jobs.

(http://media.northjersey.com/images/300*188/0702L_NEWCOUNCIL_70P.jpg)
Posters held in support of change at Monday's meeting in Hackensack.
MARKO GEORGIEV / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER

The staffing changes, including the city attorney and prosecutor, were initiated by five council members sworn in Monday after sweeping up all seats a stunning May 14 election that ended the decades-long Zisa rule. They came amid a festive reorganization in which the council thanked supporters, who filled the council chambers holding signs that read “Real change begins today.”

“Tonight is a new beginning in Hackensack — a chance to stop, look and listen,” said John Labrosse, the only incumbent to win office and chosen by his colleagues as the city’s new mayor. “We’ll stop the things that have not been working. We’ll take a hard look at where the city is headed and determine if we want to continue on that course. We’ll listen to the citizens of Hackensack.”

Labrosse was sworn in as mayor, and Kathleen Canestrino as deputy mayor. Both will serve for four years; Previously, mayors and deputy mayors served one-year rotating terms.

The other new council members are David Sims, Leonardo “Leo” Battaglia and Rose Greenman.

Joseph Zisa, the city attorney, and Richard Salkin, the municipal prosecutor, were not reappointed. The council also replaced the city’s insurance broker, the Scirocco Insurance Group, where former city mayor John “Jack” Zisa is an insurance agent. In their steads, the council appointed Thomas Scrivo — who has expertise in municipal law, including tax appeals, labor and employment, and land use — as the interim municipal attorney; Frank Catania Jr., a North Haledon-based attorney, as municipal prosecutor; and Reliance Insurance Group as the interim insurance broker.

The council also resolved to issue requests of qualifications for 16 professionals including the city attorney, labor attorney, bond counsel, engineer and public relations consultant.

The reformist takeover, promising transparency in government, followed a tumultuous time in a city that has been dogged by employee lawsuits and reports of cronyism and favoritism. It’s also a time of transition, as the city embarks on a massive downtown rehabilitation plan that is already bringing in the commitments of millions in development dollars.

Its prime mover has been a grassroots group of activists, The Citizens for Change, which launched campaigns for office in 2001 and 2005. Labrosse was the first from the group to win office four years ago.

Canestrino spoke of her years as a citizen activist in the city, where she often stood in the council chambers demanding explanations of budgets, bills and lawsuits. She described the new council members’ first moment in office as the “culmination of years of struggle to right the wrongs in Hackensack.”

“This is a day I, along with many of you, have dreamed about,” Canestrino said. “A day of rebirth for the City of Hackensack. A day of new beginning for all of us.”

The slate seized on growing discontent among voters who saw the city mired in scandal and litigation.

Council members also were appointed as liaisons to city boards and departments: Sims was appointed police commissioner, a liaison to a police department. There, he will deal with a force whose former chief, Ken Zisa, was convicted of official misconduct and insurance fraud, and many of whose members have filed lawsuits claiming they faced retaliation and coercion. Labrosse and Canestrino will serve on the Planning Board, which will face a stream of multimillion-dollar development applications that propose bringing hundreds of apartments and major new retail space to the downtown.

Local elected officials also lined up to congratulate the new council. But the moment was given added historical weight by Governor Christie, who sent a letter praising the team for its leadership.

“I commend you for your tireless effort to improve your community,” he wrote, “and for providing inspiration to neighboring communities with your exemplary performance."

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on July 03, 2013, 11:13:29 AM
The Record: Real change
Wednesday, July 3, 2013 

Supporters of the political reformers now running Hackensack city government came to the new City Council’s first meeting this week with signs reading "Real change begins today, congratulations."

Among the first moves of new Mayor John Labrosse and his four colleagues on the council was the replacement of three professionals associated with the Zisa political faction, which was beaten in the May municipal election. The city now has a new prosecutor, a new interim insurance broker and a new interim city attorney.

The changes are both symbolic and substantive. Not only do they represent a turning away from the cronyism of the past, the bringing in of new professionals is part of the wholesale housecleaning the winning council candidates promised when they ran under the banner of Citizens for Change.

Besides making immediate changes in three positions, the council said it would ask applicants for 16 other key positions to submit their qualifications. These positions include the full-time attorney’s position, the bond counsel, the engineer and a public relations consultant.

Seeking, in effect, résumés for top government jobs is a significant step toward transparency and open government. And it’s a sharp departure from the traditional practice of filling top jobs with friends and political associates. Naturally, it’s not known who will get these positions, but the simple fact that the city is soliciting qualifications from applicants is something to cheer. We hope it translates into the jobs being filled by qualified professionals as opposed to those with nothing to offer but political connections.

Reorganizing city government is only part of the job. Hackensack officials also must confront redeveloping the city’s downtown and provide needed services within a rather strict 2 percent cap on annual property tax increases. That challenge now confronts Citizens for Change. And that may be a difficult task for a group that has been mostly on the outside of government looking in.

But there is no denying that the victory by Citizens for Change has given Hackensack a breath of fresh air. Its win came after the previous city administration had been plagued by multiple lawsuits, alleged cronyism and the criminal conviction of the former police chief.

The impact of the change even drifted as far as Trenton. City elections are non-partisan, but Governor Christie was still moved to send the new government a letter of congratulations in which he praised the new slate for its "tireless effort to improve your community."

Notwithstanding the bright yellow signs held at this week’s meeting by dozens of supporters, it will take some time before we know how far-reaching and beneficial "real change" in Hackensack will be. But it’s clear that the new government is off to a good start.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on July 03, 2013, 02:47:35 PM
Inauguration Video

Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on July 04, 2013, 09:04:14 AM
Hackensack selects prosecutor with Republican ties (http://www.northjersey.com/news/214244541_Hackensack_selects_prosecutor_with_Republican_ties_friend_of_transition_leader.html?page=all)
Thursday, July 4, 2013
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK — The first non-interim staffer hired by the new City Council is a North Haledon lawyer, son of a former GOP assemblyman, and a friend and business partner of the council's transition team leader.

The council, before taking office Monday, interviewed several people for municipal prosecutor and decided to hire Frank Catania Jr. because of his experience, said Mayor John Labrosse.

Catania is a longtime friend and business partner of Anthony Rottino, the GOP figure who is leading the council's transition team.

Rottino and Catania are jointly listed as principals in eight corporations in state business records, including fitness and development businesses. The pair raced powerboats together, according to a 2000 story in The Record, and Catania gave $2,000 to Rottino's 2009 campaign in a GOP primary for state Assembly.

Catania, though, did not contribute to the candidates who won council seats in Hackensack in May, so the council didn't have to use a "fair and open process" — through a request for qualifications — that is required under state pay-to-play law.

The law bars municipalities from hiring professionals that contribute more than $300 to officeholders' campaigns, unless they go through that process.

Still, several people were interviewed and Catania was knowledgeable, Labrosse said. Catania is a former municipal prosecutor in Wanaque and is general counsel for the Bergen County Board of Social Services.

Labrosse said the former prosecutor, Richard Salkin, made $70,000 in the job. He did not know the new prosecutor's salary, and the city manager did not return calls Wednesday about the matter.

The council opted not to replace Salkin and two other professionals who are tied to the Zisa family that has dominated politics in the city for decades. The new council members, critics of the Zisas, also did not reappoint City Attorney Joseph Zisa, or an insurance brokerage firm where former Mayor Jack Zisa is an agent.

But the council did choose professionals on a temporary basis to fill those two positions at the Monday meeting: Thomas Scrivo was named interim city attorney, and the Reliance Insurance Group as the interim broker.

Labrosse said the city needed a municipal prosecutor right away, but didn't see a need to hire on an interim basis for that job.

"It's a two-day-a-week deal. We were all comfortable appointing that position. The city attorney [is different] — we had an interim because it's much more high profile," he said.

He also said he did not did view Catania's close relationship with Rottino as a conflict.

"I don't see a conflict," Labrosse said, noting the council doesn't interact with the municipal prosecutor. "He'll be working in the municipal prosecutor's office, which is totally separate from anything else."

Council spokesman Thom Ammirato said hiring through friends was fine if that person is capable, trustworthy and qualified. "The problem is if the person doesn't do the job well, is overpaid or fails to perform adequately," he said.

On the same night that Catania was appointed, the council also voted to issue a request for qualifications for 16 professionals in fields including legal, engineering and auditing.

Companies and individuals will be hired on an as-needed basis. The council expects to hire a regular city attorney and insurance broker within three months, Labrosse said, adding that he did not know if the interim professionals in those positions would apply.

The council has favorite candidates for at least two jobs. It would like to hire Ammirato as a public relations consultant and is considering Rottino for a potential new position of commissioner of redevelopment, Labrosse said.

But the council is asking for statements of qualifications for all those jobs so members can make the process transparent and to see what talent is out there and available, Ammirato said.

The council members ran on the Citizens for Change slate in the May 14 election, and swept all five seats in an upset win.

Email: adely@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on July 12, 2013, 09:27:50 AM
New Hackensack council officially open for business (http://www.northjersey.com/news/215188841_New_Hackensack_council_officially_open_for_business.html?page=all)
Friday, July 12, 2013
BY  JENNIFER VAZQUEZ
NEWS EDITOR
Hackensack Chronicle

A packed City Hall witnessed five council members take the oath of office after winning all open seats in the May 14 non-partisan municipal election.

Sen. Loretta Weinberg, D-Teaneck, left, administers the oath of office to John Labrosse, center, as his family stands watching at the Hackensack reorganization meeting on July 1 where an entirely new council was sworn in.
BERNADETTE MARCINIAK/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER

Sen. Loretta Weinberg, D-Teaneck, left, administers the oath of office to John Labrosse, center, as his family stands watching at the Hackensack reorganization meeting on July 1 where an entirely new council was sworn in.

(http://media.northjersey.com/images/300*199/HKLabrosse_071213_hk_tif_.jpg)
Family, friends, department officials and residents were present during the swearing in of the new council. Many in attendance held up yellow signs that read 'Real change begins today!! Congratulations!'
BERNADETTE MARCINIAK/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER

Dignitaries from local, county, and even state level made their presence known during the boisterous reorganization meeting on July 1.

John Labrosse, Kathleen Canestrino, David Sims, Leonardo "Leo" Battaglia, and Rose Greenman, who all ran as the Citizens for Change slate, were sworn in that night.

Labrosse, who was first from the slate to win office four years ago, was sworn in as mayor, by Sen. Loretta Weinberg.

"You are given an enormous responsibility here … you are the voice and face of Hackensack," Weinberg said to Labrosse.

Bergen County Executive Kathleen Donovan was present and swore in Canestrino, the new deputy mayor.

"I've known [Canestrino] for years … what she has accomplished is wonderful," Donovan said to attendees.

Both Labrosse's and Canestrino's appointments are four-year terms. Previously, the mayor and deputy mayor served one-year terms — a rotating position within the council.

Donovan also officiated the swearing in of Battaglia.

Rev. Jonathan Whitfield, of Trinity Baptist Church, was on hand to preside over Sims' oath of office.

Weinberg also swore in Greenman saying: "This is a diverse audience. You are very privileged to represent this community — one community, in one county, in one state."

Though not present, Governor Christie was also part of the ceremony, when Labrosse read from a framed letter the newly sworn-in council received from the head of the State of New Jersey.

"I commend your tireless efforts to improve your community," the letter read.

Assemblyman Gordon Johnson, D-Englewood, stated, "The change begins."

Assemblywoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle, D-Englewood, also addressed the new council.

"I want to congratulate the new mayor and team for bringing back the city to the people of Hackensack," she said.

Former deputy mayor Marlin Townes was also present. He addressed the new mayor and council. "I am behind you 100 percent … Hackensack, we are a family and that's the way it's going to stay."

Hackensack Fire Department Chief Thomas Freeman was also on hand to share his congratulations.

"I'm here, representing the members of the Hackensack Fire Department," he said. "I want to congratulate you. We look forward to working with you."

During the reorganization, council members were appointed as liaisons to the different city departments. Both Labrosse and Canestrino will serve on the Planning Board, assisting in overlooking the downtown's redevelopment projects. Battaglia was named liaison to the Assistance Board. Greenman was appointed to the Library Board while Sims was named Police Commissioner and liaison to the Recreation Board.

Aside from the swearing in and election of mayor, deputy mayor, and board liaisons, the council took steps to distance itself from professionals with close ties to the political Zisa family. The council replaced borough attorney Joseph Zisa with interim Borough Attorney Thomas Scrivo. It also appointed Frank Catania, Jr. as municipal prosecutor and Reliance Insurance Group as the interim insurance broker.

In all, the council moved to advertise 16 positions, including a permanent city attorney, insurance broker, public defender, bond counsel and municipal auditor.

During his speech, Battaglia said it is time to "live up to the trust you put in us…we can accomplish great things for Hackensack."

When it came for Canestrino to address those in attendance, she said it was an "indescribable honor to stand with you today as deputy mayor."

Canestrino said, that for her, the day was "more than just a personal triumph" but rather years of frustration finally culminating in the opportunity to "right the wrongs."

Sims said he was "honored."

"I am now in the position to do something for Hackensack," he said.

Greenman said that the change to come will be long-lasting.

"This night represents, not just a change in Hackensack government, but the change of its future," she said.

The theme of governmental transparency was an ongoing topic of reference, with all newly appointed council members vowing to bring an openness to the city.

Labrosse touched upon the theme when noting that new leadership is underway.

"We will provide different leadership," he said. "We promised openness and transparency, and we will bring you that."

Email: vazquez@northjersey.com
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on August 21, 2013, 09:21:18 AM
Hackensack Council installs new administration
Tuesday, August 20, 2013    Last updated: Wednesday August 21, 2013, 7:26 AM 
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK — The City Council, elected on a platform of reform, nevertheless is looking to some veteran, familiar figures as it guides redevelopment on the street and changes at City Hall.

Tuesday night, it voted to keep the city manager and create the post of director of economic development — one likely to go to Anthony Rottino, a seasoned politician and business figure who was its political ally and transition team leader.

The measures were among a slew the council approved. Others included appointments of 29 attorneys, two engineers and an auditor.

City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono’s reappointment was uncertain after the council took office in July, given his ties to the administration of the powerful Zisa political family. But members — with only Rose Greenman dissenting — decided his knowledge of city business would help in a new administration.

"I didn't think it was time to be shifting gears and changing city manager," Mayor John Labrossse said. "There's a lot of work to be done."

Lo Iacono said Tuesday night he was “thrilled” to stay on the job after the council extended him a one-year contract.

“There’s so much going on and so many projects we started together here, and I’d like to be part of seeing them continue,” he said.

Lo Iacono is responsible for appointing the economic development director. He said he has gotten a dozen resumes and will decide as early as this week, with council input.

Rottino is a businessman, Realtor and GOP operative. Deputy Mayor Kathleen Canestrino said “No one is a shoo-in, but [Rottino] has tremendous experience in this area.”

When they ran for office in the spring, council members criticized what they saw as cronyism in the prior administration. They pledged an open and merit-based system.

Rottino’s potential hire does not contradict that, council members said. Hiring, though a personal connection, is proper if a person is competent, qualified and trusted, Canestrino said. She and Mayor John Labrosse said they only met Rottino during the campaign when he was brought on as a volunteer by their campaign manager, Thom Ammirato.

“You shouldn’t have to eliminate people for the job who are highly qualified just because you know them,” Canestrino said.

Rottino was tapped to lead the Citizens for Change transition team after the slate swept the May 14 council voting, vowing to reform City Hall after years of dominance by the Zisas.

Rottino owns several businesses, including gyms and real estate and insurance companies, and he has developed residential subdivisions. He ran unsuccessfully for Bergen County Republican chairman last year and for the 40th District Assembly seat in 2009.

Rottino is part of circle of Republican figures who have gotten close to the new city administration. In July, the council named Frank Catania as municipal prosecutor; Catania is Rottino’s longtime friend and business partner.

The council also selected Ammirato as its public relations consultant. Ammirato is a GOP consultant and was Rottino’s campaign manager. The council itself is nonpartisan and include both Republicans and Democrats.

The person appointed will oversee economic development at a pivotal time in the city’s history, as it pursues an ambitious plan to redevelop the downtown.

The director will study and evaluate development issues; design and implement campaigns to attract development; and coordinate city services for projects. It will be a full-time job, but the salary hasn’t been determined yet, council members said.

Reached after the council meeting, Rottino confirmed he was seeking the job and said he had 22 or 23 years of experience in real estate and development as qualifications. He said his other business ventures wouldn’t interfere with the full-time job, because they were winding down or he would step away if he got the job.

He said he was declining further comment, until he or someone else was appointed to the position.

The council also appointed its interim city attorney, Thomas Scrivo, as city attorney; Brian Nelson of Archer & Greiner as redevelopment attorney; and Juan Fernandez and Giblin & Giblin as labor attorneys. Bond counsel, tax appeal attorneys and special litigation counsel were also named, as were two municipal engineers and an auditor.

The professionals had applied for the jobs through a request for qualifications. With their appointments, they become part of a pool of service providers, and the mayor is authorized to enter into contract with them for services.

Email: adely@northjersey.com

- See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/hackensack/Hackensack_Council_installs_new_administration.html?page=all#sthash.cVvvZOTQ.dpuf
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on August 22, 2013, 12:56:15 PM
Hackensack appoints lawyer with ties to Christie
Thursday, August 22, 2013
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK — The City Council's appointment of a prominent redevelopment lawyer with ties to the Christie administration is being viewed as a boon for the city as it pursues sweeping changes downtown.

The council, which was sworn in July 1, approved a long list of appointments Tuesday night. Notable on the list was Brian M. Nelson, a former executive director of the New Jersey Republican State Committee, who served on Governor Christie's transition team and was New Jersey counsel to Mitt Romney's presidential campaign.

"We have somebody who is brilliant and bright and has political connections, which will never hurt," said Councilwoman Rose Greenman.

In another council decision, City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono, whom some local activists view as a vestige of the embattled former city government, was reappointed under a one-year contract, a move that supporters of the new mayor and council denounced as a betrayal of their reform mission.

As redevelopment attorney, Nelson will offer legal guidance, draft resolutions, give opinions on questions of redevelopment law, and represent the city in litigation. A managing partner at Archer & Greiner, which has an office in Hackensack, Nelson is also a Christie appointee to the board of the New Jersey Economic Development Authority.

He will help the council discern which projects are right for the city, Greenman said.

"We're going to be dependent on these professionals, including Brian, to make recommendations and guide us, to tell us whether this or that is a positive development," she said.

The city is trying to attract developers to build in a 39-block downtown area that's been designated an "area in need of rehabilitation." Officials met last week with a developer interested in building a full-service luxury residential building of more than 250,000 square feet on Main Street.

Other projects include a 222-unit building on State Street that broke ground in June, and developer Fred Daibes' potential plan to turn 19.7 acres at the former site of The Record at 150 River St. into a high-end residential and retail community. The city is also considering opening a municipal lot near Foschini Park on River Street to development proposals.

Deputy Mayor Kathleen Canestrino said Nelson was impressive in his interview with the City Council.

"Brian presented a strong understanding of our city's situation and our redevelopment desires," said Canestrino. "He has the redevelopment experience that we need to guide us as we move forward with discussions with potential developers and with the community."

In his own legal practice, Nelson has represented governments, elected officials, non-profits and corporations on issues of redevelopment and economic development. Nelson could not be reached Wednesday.

Asked about the appointment, Mayor John Labrosse said he wasn't aware of Nelson's ties to Trenton and that he supported him for the job based on his experience in redevelopment law and his firm's stature and location. It has an office in Hackensack.

"There is a lot of work to do on redevelopment and we want to make sure the city has the best legal team in place to help us make the best development decisions we can," said Labrosse.

Tuesday's appointments, which included people both new and familiar to the city, come as Hackensack looks to shake off the tumult of the past administration, which was dogged by lawsuits, police department scandal, and allegations of cronyism.

Citizens for Change, which swept the May election, promised to reform City Hall. But some supporters said they felt betrayed by the council's decision to keep Lo Iacono on staff because of his ties to the previous administration.

The council extended the manager's contract Tuesday night, saying they needed someone with knowledge of city business. The manager's job was at risk when the new council took office July 1. When plans to bring on an interim city manager didn't work out, the manager's job was advertised.

None of the seven or eight résumés stood out, Labrosse said. He was also concerned that Lo Iacono would find another job and leave the city "high and dry."

"I can understand some people's dismay, but I don't look at it as a betrayal," said Labrosse.

Kathleen Salvo, a slate supporter, said she was "embarrassed" by the council's decision as she had to answer to people from whom she solicited votes. "I supported the ticket thoroughly based on their platform that they were going to bring change to Hackensack, and this is not reflective of change," she said.

Lo Iacono, city manager since 2005, makes departmental appointments and manages day-to-day operations. Critics say he has done too little to stem problems in the Police Department and to contain skyrocketing legal bills.

In a recent interview, Lo Iacono dismissed the accusation that he had been a "mouthpiece" for the Zisa political family, which was in power for decades: "It just isn't true."

Regina DiPasqua, who has been active with Citizens for Change, said she was disappointed by the decision. "Not the time to make a change? Isn't that the platform they ran on?" she said.

Only one council member, Greenman, voted against the appointment. She declined to comment on her decision Wednesday.

Email: adely@northjersey.com

- See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/news/220619151_Hackensack_appoints_lawyer_with_ties_to_Christie_will_guide_city_s_growth.html?page=all#sthash.1VqIIcgS.dpuf
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on August 23, 2013, 02:14:45 PM
Leader of Hackensack transition team is named to development post
Friday, August 23, 2013
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record
 
HACKENSACK — Anthony Rottino, a businessman and former GOP candidate for county and state office, has been named as the city's new director of economic development, the city manager announced Thursday.

Rottino will oversee economic development at a pivotal time as the city pursues an ambitious plan to redevelop the downtown. He will make $130,000 a year, City Manager Stephen Lo Iacono said.

"We did a search, and he in my opinion was the best candidate for the position," said Lo Iacono, adding that Rottino's experience in real estate and redevelopment would be an asset to the city.

The city manager said he received 12 résumés, and conducted four follow-up phone interviews.

Rottino owns several businesses, including gyms and real estate and insurance companies, and he has developed residential subdivisions. He ran unsuccessfully for Bergen County Republican chairman last year and for the 40th District Assembly seat in 2009.

City Council members had lobbied for Rottino, who headed their transition team after their sweep of the election in May, to get the post.

As director of economic development — a position that the council created by resolution on Tuesday — Rottino will study and evaluate development issues, design and implement campaigns to attract development, and coordinate city services for projects.

Rottino said that his other business ventures wouldn't interfere with the full-time job because they were winding down or he would step away from them if he got the job. He starts work on Monday.

Email: adely@northjersey.com

- See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/news/220771721_Leader_of_Hackensack_transition_team_is_named_to_development_post_director_for_new_growth.html#sthash.hTAe4yXj.dpuf
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Whitey on August 26, 2013, 12:45:26 PM
That is a very high salary for a Hackensack City employee.  NJ Public Employee records for 2012 (below) show that Mr. Rottino would be the 5th highest paid employee.  It is not clear whether he would have an office at City Hall and whether it would be staffed with City Employees.  This could wind up costing a lot of money.

NJ Public Employees, 2012

LOIACONO, STEPHEN    $167,303
CHRIST JOHN                 $153,850    
DAMORE JESSE  V      $141,164
KOSTER ADRIAN           $136,335
CARLSON ARTHUR  B   $125,258
HECK DEBRA  A                   $124,199
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: regina on August 26, 2013, 06:09:29 PM
Actually, John Christ just retired, so move him up to #4 spot. His office, if he gets one, should be in the Building Department on Railroad, not City Hall, just my opinion.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on September 05, 2013, 10:21:13 AM
From the City's official website (http://www.hackensack.org/controls/eventview.aspx?MODE=SINGLE&ID=731):

News Release
City of Hackensack
65 Central Avenue,
Hackensack, NJ 07601
(201) 646-3901

Thom Ammirato
973-403-7836
September 4, 2013

COUNCIL MAKES MANY IMPROVEMENTS IN FIRST 60 DAYS;
LAYS GROUNDWORK FOR FUTURE ACCOMPLISHEMENT

 (Hackensack, NJ) After just two months in office the new governing body of Hackensack is making significant changes in city government and laying the groundwork for future improvements.

 In just over 60 days in office the new city council, which won a stunning election victory in May, has expanded mid-day hours at the city clerk’s office, terminated a lease for police substation that was unneeded and ineffective; appointed the city’s first police commission in decades and the first ever African American public defender – and has begun offering video viewing of city council meetings.

 The city also is continuing a pilot project for twice a week garbage collection and will announce its next step soon.

 In addition has hired talented new professionals in a bipartisan manner, including a new city attorney and special redevelopment counsel, while also creating an economic redevelopment position to begin addressing the city’s short and long-term development issues.

“We have done a lot in a short period of time, but we realize there is a lot more to do,” said Mayor John Labrosse. “Coming in to government with five new council members, four of whom have never served in government before, presented an initial challenge, but we have successfully overcome that challenge and we have the pieces in place to tackle the long range issues for the city.”

Labrosse is the only council member who served previously in city government. Council member Kathleen Canestrino, Leo Battaglia, David Sims and Rose Greenman are all first time elected officials.

 Among the long range issues under consideration by the council said Deputy Mayor Canestrino is the possible construction of a new community center.

“High on our agenda is a new community center that will double as a recreation complex that will serve both the children and the senior citizens of our community,” said Canestrino. She said the city is looking to offset the costs of a recreation complex with contributions from developers and existing business and organization that will support the project.

 To work with developers, the city council hired Anthony Rottino as the city’s new economic development director. In that position, Rottino has begun meeting with prospective developers and working with outside agencies to establish a redevelopment baseline.

“There is no shortage of developers who want to meet with the new administration and discuss their proposals,” said Rottino. “With a new council has come a renewed interest in Hackensack by many reputable developers.”

Rottino says the city is being besieged by redevelopment requests but those proposals have to be put into a global redevelopment context. “My job and the council’s job is to set redevelopment priorities and make sure that the best projects get done; the projects that will have the best long-term value for the city,” said Rottino.

 While redevelopment will occupy much of the city council time over the next few years, there is no shortage of daily nuts and bolt issues to contend with.

 Councilman Sims as the police commissioner is embracing public safety issues and working on recreation matters. He is joined by Councilman Battaglia, who also has a strong interest in recreation and sports, as well as concerns about improving and streamlining the city’s public works department and addressing flooding and road paving issues.

 Councilwoman Greenman is taking on the role of legal liaison, reviewing legal hiring practices and legal bills. She is also working on improving the city’s open public records request responses.
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on September 27, 2013, 11:35:49 AM
Hackensack officially appoint attorneys
Friday, September 27, 2013
BY  JENNIFER VAZQUEZ
NEWS EDITOR

The governing body passed a resolution at the Sept. 17 meeting naming individuals and firms to various positions — including assigning city, labor and tax appeal attorneys.

As per the resolution McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP was designated the city attorney and will receive compensation which "will not exceed $200,000 without the express writing authorization of the city."

According to the city spokesman, Thom Ammirato, by law there had to be a city attorney in place on the day the new council was appointed. Tom Scrivo, an attorney with the designated firm, acted as such. Though the governing body has had counsel in place since the day of their appointment the latest resolution makes it official.

"The council couldn't leave that spot vacant," Ammirato said in reference to the fact that the governing body has had an attorney appointed since its inception. "The Mayor and Council didn't have time to start an RFQ [request for qualification] process because they weren't a governing body prior to July 1 … they always had someone in place, the same firm, but this makes it official."

Juan C. Fernandez was named the city's labor attorney. Officials also named Mark A. Raso its tax appeal attorney. Both will receive compensation that will not exceed $100,000 each. In addition, Jeffrey R. Surenian and Associates was named counsel for affordable housing. Compensation is also stipulated as to not exceed $100,000 without the city's written authorization.

As for special litigation counsels, the city named a number firms designated to particular cases. Carmagnola & Ritardi, LLC is assigned to labor and employment investigations. Thomas B. Hanrahan & Associates, LLC is representing Charles, Joseph and John Zisa. in the 62-64 Main Street, LLC and 59 to 61 Morris Street, LLC v. The City of Hackensack case. In addition, Ditkas Gillen, PC is representing former council members Karen Sasso, Jorge E. Meneses, Marlin G. Townes, Michael R. Melfi and Charles P. McAuliffe in the same case.

Lastly, Dario, Yacker, Suarez & Albert, LLC is representing the city, while Ditkas Gillen, PC is representing Anthony Farraiolo in the Charles Zisa v. City of Hackensack case.

The compensation for the special litigation counsels, according to Ammirato, will not exceed $440,000 without the city's authorization.

"This is in total — combining all special counsels, not per each one," he said.

All the attorneys assigned will be paid $150 an hour — up from $125 from the previous administration — since "most other municipalities offer $150 and it encourages a certain level of professionals," Ammirato said.

In addition, the fact that all positions have a "threshold amount" will allow the governing body to keep track of the billing expenses, according to Ammirato.

"They will do the work and bill against that amount until the money is exhausted," he explained. "They will need written consent from the governing body to go over. At least this way, you have a way of keeping track of the money."

Mayor John Labrosse spoke about the appointments at the Mayor and Council meeting.

"I'm glad to get all these RFQs [requests for qualifications] on board," he said. "All these professionals are here to help us go through, just as we said, with the tax appeals, some of the things that have happened in the past and get to the bottom of some stuff…I am looking forward with helping them."

Email: vazquez@northjersey.com

- See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/news/225457052_Hackensack_officially_appoint_attorneys_attorneys.html?page=all#sthash.0nsPBPkm.dpuf
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Whitey on October 03, 2013, 01:46:07 PM
Interesting letter by former Mayor Muti of Ramsey:

The Record: Letters, Wednesday, Oct. 2
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 2, 2013, 11:05 AM
THE RECORD

Hackensack pays lawyers too much

Regarding "Hackensack ups the pay rate for outside lawyers," (Page L-3, Sept. 28):

The city of Hackensack has hit upon a unique crime-fighting idea, paying its lawyers more money so that they will be more honest in their billing practices.

"We’re trying to keep the process honest and make sure we’re paying a fair number," Hackensack spokesman Thom Ammirato said, according to The Record. "The lawyers taking the positions realize they’re getting a fair number, and they’ll be fair in their billing."

Overbilling by lawyers — that is, inflating time records so that clients can be charged for more time than was actually spent on their cases — is fraud, of course.

This Hackensack initiative could trigger a wave of like-minded, anti-crime reforms across the country, like doubling the salaries of mayors and other public officials as an incentive for them to refuse bribes. Or bringing pay-to-play out of the closet and making it legal.

Civil engineers, architects, planning consultants and lawyers would compete for public contracts using sealed bids, bidding not for the lowest cost of services to taxpayers but for the highest sums they are willing to contribute to politicians in power to get the public contracts.

Government of the people, by the people and for the people?  Of, by, and for which people? That is the question.

Richard Muti
Ramsey, Sept. 29
The writer is a former mayor of Ramsey.
- See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/news/opinions/226088061_The_Record__Letters__Wednesday__Oct__2.html?page=all

Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on December 11, 2013, 11:30:12 PM
Verdict reversed against Hackensack candidate accused of stealing opponent’s campaign signs
Wednesday, December 11, 2013    Last updated: Wednesday December 11, 2013, 5:23 PM   
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER
The Record
 
A Bergen County Superior Court judge has reversed a guilty verdict against former Hackensack City Council candidate Kenneth Martin, who was charged with theft after he allegedly stole his opponents’ campaign signs.

- See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/hackensack/Verdict_reversed_against_retired_Hackensack_cop_found_guilty_of_stealing_oppenents_campaign_.html#sthash.NQIgWcus.dpuf
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on January 11, 2014, 01:46:03 PM
New Hackensack administration takes a look at the past six months
Friday, January 10, 2014
BY  JENNIFER VAZQUEZ
NEWS EDITOR
Hackensack Chronicle
   
HACKENSACK – While early January is a time of reorganization and to usher in new beginnings in many municipalities, including neighboring South Hackensack, Jan. 1 marked the six-month anniversary of Hackensack's new administration taking office.

On July 1 of last year, Citizens for Change swept the elections – winning all five council seats. Since then, the mayor and council affirm that many changes have taken place

- See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/news/239536691_New_Hackensack_administration_takes_a_look_at_the_past_six_months.html?page=all#sthash.CdcAtTXN.dpuf
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on January 23, 2014, 12:09:45 AM
Despite strides in first half-year, Hackensack council still in transition
Wednesday, January 22, 2014    Last updated: Wednesday January 22, 2014, 1:17 PM
BY  HANNAN ADELY
STAFF WRITER

The Record

HACKENSACK — The government-reform candidates who swept into office last spring have in six months cleared out members linked to the old political establishment and taken firm control of city finances.

But critics say the new City Council has sold short its promise to end favoritism, by naming two political figures to key jobs. And as the council is credited for its strides in making local government more open and transparent, the new administration still is very much in transition as it marks six months in office and prepares to rebuild its government team and set new policies.

- See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/news/241417971_Despite_strides_in_first_half-year__Hackensack_council_still_in_transition_flux_as_leaders_clean_house.html#sthash.SAJ9pBTu.dpuf
Title: Re: 2013 Election
Post by: Editor on May 06, 2014, 10:09:44 AM
Hackensack mayor cites divide in once unified city council
May 6, 2014    Last updated: Tuesday, May 6, 2014, 1:21 AM
By CHRISTOPHER MAAG
STAFF WRITER
The Record

HACKENSACK — The mayor and deputy mayor who led a successful, first-in-a-generation effort to oust the dominant Zisa family from power may now find themselves in a power struggle against the majority of council members and two key city employees for control of city government.

http://www.northjersey.com/news/tension-grips-hackensack-council-1.1009714?page=all