Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ericmartindale

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 13
61
The plan to build a new elementary school on a high school athletic field should be considered a loss of open space. It's more than just a loss of recreation for the students.

I also feel that the school system is moving in the opposite direction of neighborhood-based schools. Decades ago, all children K-5 went to schools in their own neighborhood, or reasonably close. The logic was that 6th graders are old enough to walk to or from school on their own, so if they had to walk a mile or two, that was considered acceptable.

Then, all 5th grade classes were consolidated into the Five-6 school on the Middle School campus. So now you have kids a year younger having to walk very far.

Now the Board of Education wants to take that same approach for younger and younger kids. Now they want even 3rd and 4th graders from all over the city to attend a single school. They are essentially forcing all parents to drive their kids to and from school. I am remarried with a 5-year old, and living in Maywood. Thinking of buying a house in Hackensack, which is more affordable than the suburban towns, but I would then be subjected to these education logistics and having to purchase another automobile. The Board of Education should not be complicating people's lives with education logistics.

There are multiple problems with education logistics.

1. First is that it complicates the ability of parents to have employment. The potential employment of at least one parent (sometimes there is ONLY one parent) now has to work around driving a child to and from school. So that leaves not enough daytime hours to work full-time.

2. Second, if there are children in more than one school, the logistics are even worse.

3. Third, not everyone has a car, or perhaps they only have one car and the spouse who works full-time with a good-paying job is using it all day.

4. Lots of parents without cars walk their younger kids to school. It's too much to expect them to walk their small child miles across town. Especially in the cold, in the rain, in light snow when there is no snow day.

All of this really makes life difficult for families in Hackensack. It's totally anti-civic. Maybe this is being done deliberately to discourage families with children from living in Hackensack. And if that is the case, (unsure) that would be simply terrible public policy.

The Board of Education is moving in the opposite direction. They need to go back to having all kids K-5 educated in neighborhood schools, or perhaps K-6. If that means expanding them, expand. If that means building a new school somewhere in the center of Hackensack, do it.  If that means to change the boundaries of the elementary schools, do it. The boundaries are non-sensical, having been gerrymandered for racial balance reasons at least 40 years ago, and those demographic issues no longer exist. All of Hackensack is thoroughly mixed. There are Latino's and African-Americans all over Hackensack, in every neighborhood.

Or even better, make all neighborhood elementary schools K-6, and perk the boundaries to make the enrollment numbers vs. available classroom space work. I bet grades 7-8 can fit in the old Middle school building, which was designed for 6-8. The current Five6 school can become a K-6 school for the Park Street area Hackensack, and lower Anderson Street, and moving outwards a few blocks as needed to fill up the school.

There would still be the need to build one new school, I would say somewhere in the area of Kansas Street. 

The Hackensack School system should be moving in the direction of neighborhood-based schools, and not in the direction of parents having to drive little kids all over Hackensack.

62
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Clinton Place Halloween Decorations
« on: November 22, 2018, 09:55:01 PM »
Since this website is being billed mostly as a local history site, maybe you should change the name from HackensackNow.com to HackensackThen.com

63
Hackensack Discussion / Re: School safety, guns, etc...
« on: November 21, 2018, 08:59:45 PM »
HUNDREDS OF OUTSIDER STUDENTS AT HHS. My step-daughter is a senior at Hackensack High School. She says there are "hundreds" of students who live in other cities that either drive or take a bus to attend Hackensack High School. "There five from Garfield, that I know of". She says there's dozens each from Paterson and Passaic, and a few from Englewood and Bogota. Even 2 or 3 from Teaneck.  She says just a few of them are athletes that were given permission or their coach pulled some strings to get them in, and the vast majority are just here illegally. 

Most either use relatives addresses for the registration, or they used to live in Hackensack and moved, but continue to use their old address.

I guess the word is out that Hackensack is really lax on this front, and you can get away with it.  Just like some people want America to have "open borders", perhaps some administrators in the high school want an open border concept for students from other places to attend HHS.

This is important because Hackensack is spending money to build another school. And if there are really that many extra kids in Hackensack High School, that's a taxpayer issue in its own right.

64
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Clinton Place Halloween Decorations
« on: November 19, 2018, 10:38:19 PM »
Today I saw something paranormal on the Halloween block of Clinton Place. Absolutely out of mainstream science, and cannot be explained.  No, I'm not going into details, only that it can be categorized as a reddit, and it happened in the street in front of the vacant lot just west of Prospect Ave. Now, the story gets more interesting. I tell what I saw to a group of three people, and one of them keeps interrupting me and completing my story. He has seen something similar on Clinton Place.  It happened to him a half-block away. Something weird is going on.

65
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Vote Tuesday: Open Space Referendum
« on: November 07, 2018, 01:16:43 PM »
Great news on the landslide voter support for this initiative.  I'm going to try and appear before the Hackensack Environmental Commission and try to get support for either direct acquisition or conservation easement on the 3 hill lots adjacent to Borg's Woods, especially the one closest to Fairmount Avenue, which people think has street frontage to Fairmount Ave, but it does not. 

My guess is that the three lot owners would probably prefer a conservation easement, if they want preservation at all. And one with a guarantee that no trails will be lain out on the lots. At least a conservation easement will be less money to come up with. I'm guessing a few hundred thousand, tops, will be enough. In 1995, two other hill lots totally 1.0 acres were added to the land preserved in 1994, and those lots totalled $91,000. In 1994 money.  Land is worth more now, I'd say.

One of the owners is the house on Summit Ave that just spent a few hundred thousand on rehab (Summit west side near Poplar Ave), and recently cut down all the huge Sweetgums on the front yard. They are the most magnificient fall foliage tree in our area, and it was a loss for the beauty of Summit Ave. This house owns the "fenced lot" along the trail that parallels the ridge.  I am most doubtful of this owner, but you never know.

66
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Hackensack Transit Connector
« on: November 07, 2018, 02:26:50 AM »
Nice find.  Yes, it looks like a resurrection of the former shuttle route, but I'm betting that it will run up State Street instead of Main Street, because NJ Transit is removing all buses from Main Street, and moving them to State Street, as part of the 2-way conversion project.

67
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Hackensack Transit Connector
« on: November 02, 2018, 05:19:25 AM »
Sounds like a resurrection of the once-popular shuttle that ran Main Street, Anderson Street, Prospect Ave, and Essex Street. Joseph Campagna and myself headed up that effort so many years ago, starting around 1993, and the proposal was part of the whole plan to revitalize the business community by bringing large-scale residential development to the downtown center.

There were lots of things that went wrong with the original shuttle, including them breaking down too often, making it free instead of charging something nominal, and not implementing the advertising plan as originally proposed. I guess it's time to try again.

Does anyone know, what is the new route ?

68
Hackensack Discussion / Re: 153 Main Street fire
« on: October 28, 2018, 09:27:54 PM »
Hackensack has lost ANOTHER building of significant historic character, one that I had long hoped would be someday restored to it's original glory.

69
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Teterboro Airport
« on: September 21, 2018, 06:52:07 AM »
yes, Homer, I remember that one.  One of many downtown proposals that sat gathering dust.  The one I was talking about for Banta Place extending eastwards was much older, and it was something I found while researching things. It wasn't a current news story I experienced. 


70
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Renovation Central Ave
« on: September 11, 2018, 07:38:40 AM »


I've never been able to load photos to this website. The process is unusual and very difficult for me

71
Hackensack Discussion / Renovation Central Ave
« on: September 11, 2018, 07:37:54 AM »
[img]file:///Users/ericmartindale/Pictures/Flags%20in%20Hackensack/renovation%20Central%20Ave.2018.jpg/img]
Lots of houses get vinyl siding, but I consider this particular project to be very significant due to it's prominent location.  This is a major improvement for the core Central Ave corridor

72
That stairwell is 3 stories above grade, so far. And how tall is the building going to be ? At least 5 stories, I'm sure.  Your fears are confirmed, goodbye river view from your penthouse apartment.

73
Exactly. There could be a sudden downdraft during a thunderstorm, in which an airplane suddenly loses 400 feet altitude. And then it's all over.

74
Hackensack History / Re: Demolition of The Record building
« on: September 04, 2018, 10:20:56 AM »
None of the other 643 construction sites are so isolated that they COULD BE demolished with explosives or a wrecking ball.  It was a reasonable speculation, and I was wondering the same thing.

75
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Goodbye, Geri's Deli
« on: August 20, 2018, 03:49:17 AM »
What needs to go is the billboard

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 13