1039
« on: May 10, 2004, 11:42:08 PM »
The following docket was faxed to me. Typos may appear due to the transfer to electronic form. The docket appears below, with results in italics.
DOCKET and Results of MEETING OF MAY I2, 2004[/center]
1. Roll Call.
2. Approval of bills.
3. Consideration of minutes of the meeting of April 14,2004
4. Memoralization of resolutions from meeting of April 14, 2004 after review of requested plans:
a)AMENDED SITE PLAN #05-04 & V#l5-04, GREATER NJ DEVELOPMENT, 273 STATE STREET. APPROVED
b) SUB~75O-04, CHENG II. LIN. 144 HOPPER STREET. APPROVED
c) SUB #755-04 V~ 11-04, ARTHUR MENTO, 175 BERRY STREET, APPROVED
Approved
5. AMENDED SITE PLAN #05-044 V#l5~4. GREATER NEW JERSEY DEVELOPMENT, 273 STATE STREET. BLOCK 317. LOTS 13/l4 ZONE B2 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Applicant requests approval to amend prior site plan approval to permit construction of an eight story multi-family dwelling requiring the following:
I )Insufficient sideyard setback ratio: Required 4:1=20; Proposed 15
2)Insufficient aisle width. Required 25’; Proposed 24’ CONDITION APPROVAL 4/14/04, PENDING LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLANS
Adjouned to 6/9 (I think)
5B. SUB #750-04 CHENG II. LIN 144 HOPPER STREET. BLOCK 120 LOTS 1 to 4 R-IA DISTRICT. ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. Applicant requests approval to subdivide existing 100 x 100’ lot into two (2) 50’,xl00’ lots and to renovate existing structure to eliminate any bulk variances. APPROVED 4/18/04-PENDING PLANS
Approved.
6. SUB #755-04 & V# 11-04. ,ARTHUR MENTO. 175 BURY STREET. BLOCK
330. Lots 26 &27. ZONE R-2 RESIDENTIAL. Applicant requests permission to subdivide existing 75 x 120 lot and construct two 2-family dwellings on two 37’6" lots, requiring the following:
1. Insufficient lot width (Required 50’0" — Proposed 37’6"
2. Subdivision required.
3. Such other variances as may be required
APPROVED 4/14/04-PENDING PLANS
Approved
7. SITE PLAN #02-04. SUB #754-04 &V#07-04. COMMERCE BANK. 98-110 MOORE STREET (aka 111 RIVER STREET. BLOCK 204.A. LOTS 16~24± 26B,26C.260.26E & 26F, ZONE 8-2 BUSINESS DISTRICT. Applicant requests permission to demolish the existing building and construct a bank with drive-in facility. See official docket for more infor
RESCHEDULED FROM APRIL 14. 2004 & CONTINUED FROM APRIL 26,2004
Approved as amended. The site has one more space than required by ordinance. The sign size of the original application was reduced and will be constructed with red brick, as requested by the board. Variances were eliminated. The site will have a rear drive thru on Moore Street, with entrances and exits on Moore and Atlantic. It will have four lanes for teller windows.
8. SITE PLAN APJ’L. #12-03 & VARIANCE #36-03, MARICA JULIA. LLC., 493
ESSEX STREET. BLOCK 137. LOT 51. ZONE B-I BUSINESS DISTRICT
Applicant requests permission to demolish an existing one Family dwelling and construct a 2,620 s.f. medical office building requiring the following:
a)Preliminary and final site plan approval required pursuant to Ordinance #175-44 b)insufficient aisle width - Required 25’. Proposed 24’
c)Sign exceeds maximum square footage — Required 12’, Proposed 15’ d)Insufficient setback of parking lot to B-I & R-IA Districts
Required 10’ - Proposed 4’
c)insufficient parking provided: Required 24 — Proposed 20.
f)Insufficient sideyard setback in B-1 & R-IA Districts
g)Such other variances as may be required.
RESCHEDULED FROM 11/12. l2/1O/0~ & 1114,3/10,4/14/04, & CONTINUED FROM 4126/04
Adjouned.
9. SUB #752-04 & V#04-04. GERALD ANTHONY. 96 COLES AVENUE & BLOCK
622. LOTS 5,6,17.18. ZONE R-IA. ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE.
Applicant requests subdivision and variances to construct a one family dwelling facing South Lake Drive requiring the following:
LOT 5.0I-96 COLES AVENUE-EXISTNG LOT
I) Exceeds maximum permitted land coverage: Existing 1668 s.f (33%), Required 1250 s.f. (25%)
2) Insufficient front yard setback-Existing 14.05’, Required 25’
3) Insufficient setback to garage: Existing 14.05’, Required 25’.
4) Insufficient side yard setback to garage: Existing 4.65’, Required 7’6".
5) Insufficient rear yard setback to deck: Proposed 1 9’O", Required 20’O"
PROPOSED LOT 18.0 1-SOUTH LAKE DRIVE
1) Insufficient lot size: Proposed 4,922sf., Required 5,000 s.f.
2) Insufficient front yard setback-Proposed 20~+, Required 25’
3) Exceeds minimum allowable land coverage: Proposed 29.7%, 1479 s.f..-Required - 1248 s.f., 25%
4) Such other variances as may be required
CARRIED FROM 3/10 & 4/14/04
Approved as modified. Applicant must construct a road to the house as part of the approval. Question was raised the proposed home may be in a flood zone. FEMA maps indicated that it is not. Originally the home was over-sized for the lot, but the applicant reduced the size to 1224 sq. ft. One member of the public commented that there may not be adequate access for fire trucks, to which a board member (and fire department official) addressed, indicating the new road actually increases access in that area.
10. SUB #742k SITE PLAN #17-03 & VH4I-03. MARINI BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO.. INC. LAFAYETTE AVENUE. BLOCK 3LLOTS 15/JR. ZONED~I. MANUFACTURINO. Applicant requests subdivision, site plan approval and variances to demolish an existing residential structure on Lot 18 and merge and subdivide the remaining lots into two. 50 x 100 lots and construct a new 2 story building requiring the following:
1. Subdivision approval required. I’18t1 submitted does not correctly indicate the proposed lot widths.
2. Site plan approval required.
3, Lot #1 (with existing two family dwelling to remain;
a)Insufficient front yard setback--Required 25’, Proposed/Existing 4’IW’
b)Insufficient side yard setback (secondary street)—Required 15’.
Proposed/Existing I .30~
c)Insufficient parking provided—Required 4, Proposed/Existing I.
d)Lot paved in excess of 50% of front side and rear yard.
4. Lot 2—Parking prohibited in front yard setback—Required I5’0", Proposed 0’0"
5. Such other variances which may be required.
RESCHEDULED FROM APRIL 14, 2004
Approved, despite 3 members of the public seeking to have the application denied. Residents cited noise problems, traffic congestion, fire truck access, unsightlyness, etc. Board members responed that the site is zoned for light industrial use, including the proposed construction warehouse. Apparently the warehouse will only accommodate 2 of the 5 vehicles currently stored on the open lot. Residents argued that while there are landscaping yards in the neighborhood, there are no construction yards with heavy equipment and the neighborhood has be improving, moving away from light industrial. The applicant argued that some coverage of the existing equipment is better than none at all. The application was approved with two board members voting against it.
11. SUB #753-04 &V#05-04. CARLOS ROCHA. 76 LODI STREET. BLOCK 57 LOT
4 ZONE R-2. One & Two Family Residential. Applicant requests subdivision of existing 75’ wide property with existing 2 1/2 story dwelling into two lots requiring the following:
I. Subdivision will create two non-conforming lots (see official docket for more info)
Rescheduled FROM 11/12 & 12/10/03, ADJOURNED PROM 1/14, 2111, 3/10 & 4/14/04.
Denied. Board apparently thought there was no real hardship for granting the variances and/or approving the plan.
12. SITE PLAN #5-04 & v# 16~04. SAFWAT SUAKER. M.D.. 38 SUMMIT AVENUE
BLOCK 240 LOT 2.B. ZONE R-1 (OVERLAY DISTRICT RflS1DENTIAL ZONE
Applicant requests approval to renovate existing dwelling and convert to a doctor’s Office requiring the following:
l)Site plan approval required pursuant to 175-24.6 office overlay district.
2)Insufficient setback to property line From parking lot
3)Such other variances as may be required.
I had to leave before the vote. I'll try to find out and post later. Does anyone know?
13. SITE PLAN #07-04 & V#17-04, BULLET ELECTRIC. 290 LODI STREET.BLOCK 100.J & LOT 1/3. Applicant requests approval to renovate existing building and improve parking lot requiring the following:
I) Insufficient front yard setback to stairs and ramp:
Required 15’0"" — Proposed 0"
2) Insufficient lot width — Required 100’ — Existing 97.12’
3) Insufficient sideyard setback — Required 10’ — Existing 0.4’
4) Insufficient rearyard setback.— Required 10’— Existing 03’
5) Such other variances as may be required.
Adjouned.
14. SITE PLAN #0944. 190 MAIN STREET ASSOCIATES. 185 MOORE STREET. BLOCKI1 1. LOT 3. ZONE 8-3 BUSINESS DISTRICT. Applicant requests approval to demolish the existing one story structure and construct a parking lot with park area on Main Street, requiring the following:
I )Site Plan required pursuant to 175-44(A)
2)Such other variances as may be required.
Applicant did not show.
NOTE (appearing on official notice): When the case is called you may appear either in person or by attorney and present any testimony which you may have concerning the application. Alt documents relating to the applications can be inspected in the office of the Building, Housing Land Use Department, 65 Central Avenue, Hackensack, between the hours of 1:00 P.M. to 2:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, or by appointment.
Show Posts