Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - average Joe

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Hackensack Discussion / Re: HUMC Expansion
« on: March 11, 2008, 11:57:33 PM »
irons35.methinks i smell a "vested interest"
1 you disparage emts working for humc.im to believe that they are inferior to fire dept persoonnel because YOU say so??!!.you fail to back up your assertions one iota
2 so the cuty recoups its expenditures?what about the periodic purchases of new ambulances .why do you overlook that factor in your "calculations"?
3 try to remember that humc is tax exempt by state law.that the prior administration and this one have been able to exact payments be they in the form of taxes or rental for overhead walkways or ,yes the million dollar gift is a credit to them
4 120 parking spaces adjacent to prospect ave will lie fallow?  what are you smoking?
5 illegal contract? put your money where your mout is.if you think that the city has enetered such an arrangement,why dont you sue.you only need to be a resident of hackensack to do so.you are  resident,atrent you?

2
Hackensack Discussion / Re: HUMC Expansion
« on: March 11, 2008, 08:55:54 PM »
now let me get this straight.. the city gets full emt service 'equal to or better than" that which is currently provided.the savings of about $700,000 a year in salaries(i note that there is no mention of the elimination of the need to purchase new ambulances periodically.ya think thats an additional savings to we taxpayers?):120 parking spaces.a stream of income for the air rights of the overhead walkways..and i almost forgot,1 million dollars!
and you folks are complaining?..maybe there really IS something in the water!

3
Hackensack Discussion / Re: District 37 Politics
« on: February 02, 2008, 11:05:46 PM »
short on history,'just watching"... chief z. already served in assembly while serving as chief,police dept did just fine.to characterise this as 'part-time" chief is just smear,based on motivations known best to you.
he s competent in both positions.so far as it goes(LOL)

4
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Shared Services
« on: August 20, 2006, 07:04:30 PM »
mr editor,i am mildly,tho pleasently,surprised to see you express a perspective/opinion on an issue...wonder if the "brains" in trenton, if mandated "regionalisation" is in the offing, will calculate bus transportation into the mix?
beware the "simple" solution to anything...

5
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Shared Services
« on: August 17, 2006, 12:18:04 AM »
just minding my own business..figured id see whats new on "hack/now"..lo and behold! "eric the conqueror" plans to annex austria..er wait..thats teterboro..yet doesnt want me to "jab"him..dont know who this "hamburgler"is..think its "hamburglAr "s cousin?
dont know eric ,think these unsuspecting folks we re gonna take over have a right to know that YOU are part of the package?

6
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Juvenile Detention Center
« on: August 03, 2006, 09:52:54 PM »
wait hamburglar,you mean eric DIDNT invent the intermet?

7
eric your inability to admit your errors is laughable. i had a lawyer friend double check this for me.she practices law .you dont!
get over yourself.as the expression goes"you come without potfolio"

8
eric.i thought zoning was your area.but again youve shot yourself in the foot.i checked with city hall.youve misread the zoning requirements for multi family in  the b 1.the height limit is the same as the town house zone.an r2 b.
'THE SKY IS FALLING ! THE SKY IS FALLING!"
DO YOUR HOMEWORK FOR ONCE?

9
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Underwood Case
« on: May 09, 2006, 05:45:01 PM »
"harsh words" eric? you accused an innocent dedictated elected official of criminal conduct, suggested that he was under investigation by"higher authotities",and even when the courts cleared his name once and for all,took another cheap shot. so do i have this right ,YOU are the victim of "harsh words"?
nice spin.but some of us pay attention...

10
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Underwood Case
« on: May 06, 2006, 01:16:09 AM »
gee eric,heres the funny thing,if one looks back on your postings here in the so-called "underwood" matter from the very beginning it is quite clear that you were talking through your hat."higher authorities' eric? as it all turns out,zisa said from the beginning that that he did nothing wrong.now the court of appeals says"we agree".frankly you owe an apology.because from the beginning yours was the same "bs" political agenda as the taxpayers group you now condemn.you turned on zisa you turned on them.youre not my first choice to be in a foxhole with ,as the expression goes.in other words, people should not turn their back on you

11
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Underwood Case
« on: May 04, 2006, 10:01:01 AM »
hamburglar guess eric and mayor Jack have different views of what":community service" means

12
Hackensack Discussion / Fmr. Mayor wins Appeal
« on: May 02, 2006, 05:25:47 PM »
congratulations Mayor Jack!
so  the "record" was behind the whole thing?
why am i not surprised??

13
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Hackensack Real Estate Threads (comments)
« on: February 27, 2006, 10:05:41 PM »
since when are opinions not welcomed? i think eric has earned the right to state his,whether i agree with it or not

14
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Fire at Potrero!
« on: January 16, 2006, 06:11:46 PM »
damn! that is bad news..hope it reopens

15
Hackensack Discussion / Re: Overcrowding - Illegal Students
« on: November 02, 2005, 07:25:22 PM »
anthony- even the most ardent slimers of the hackensack school system have always conceded that the kids at the "top" i.e. "the top 20" would excel whereever they went to school
you on the other hand have sunk to a new low-guess what? some of these kids choose state schools-yes even BCC, out of family financial situations-in fact i seem to recall about a year ago a story about a grad of BCC transferring to Yale-so there is a mehod to most of it-tho that wouldnt fit into your world view im sure
dont let facts get in the way of you venom

Pages: [1] 2 3
anything